{"id":337299,"date":"2025-10-28T01:24:12","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T01:24:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/337299\/"},"modified":"2025-10-28T01:24:12","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T01:24:12","slug":"health-insurance-premiums-to-double-on-colorados-individual-market","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/337299\/","title":{"rendered":"Health insurance premiums to double on Colorado’s individual market"},"content":{"rendered":"

Premiums will double next year for Coloradans who buy their health insurance on the state\u2019s individual market, with higher-income families facing increases of $10,000 or more, the Colorado Division of Insurance<\/a> announced Monday.<\/p>\n

Marketplace customers face a double hit this year. The monthly \u201csticker price\u201d of health insurance is rising, typically due to the aging population and increased use of expensive care, including high-cost medications. And households will have to pay a larger share of that monthly cost than they have since the pandemic as the tax credits that subsidize insurance purchases revert to pre-COVID levels.<\/p>\n

The average person who receives subsidies to buy their insurance through Connect for Health Colorado<\/a>, the state-run marketplace, will have to pay 101% more in 2026 after accounting for both factors, according to the Division of Insurance.<\/p>\n

The enhanced subsidies lowered the percentage of a person\u2019s income that they had to put toward premiums. For example, an individual earning $35,000 per year previously had to pay 3% of their income, or $1,033 annually, for their insurance, according to the health policy group KFF<\/a>. Next year, they\u2019ll have to pay 7.5%, or about $2,615.<\/p>\n

People earning more than four times the federal poverty line, or about $128,000 for a family of four, won\u2019t receive any subsidies next year. For a family of four at that income level in Denver, premiums for a silver plan would rise $14,000, with greater increases in rural areas. The enhanced subsidies also phased out as income increased, but did so more gradually<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The division estimated about 75,000 of the 335,000 people who buy insurance on the state marketplace will opt to go without coverage, leaving them exposed to high medical bills if they have an unexpected illness or accident.<\/p>\n

Jessica Nelson, of Denver, said going without insurance isn\u2019t an option for her family, so they\u2019ll have to choose a less generous plan, take on more work to raise their incomes, or cut non-essential spending. Both she and her husband are self-employed, and neither wants to return to corporate jobs for the sake of insurance.<\/p>\n

But at least they can make the numbers work, she said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI just keep thinking about the people who are going to be losing their insurance,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

The upcoming lapse in tax credits is driving the now four-week-long government shutdown. Democrats say that any deal to reopen the government should include an extension of the enhanced subsidies, while Republicans say any extension has to come after a deal to fund federal agencies<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Mannat Singh, executive director of the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative<\/a>, cast doubt on Republicans\u2019 willingness to extend the subsidies when the government reopens.<\/p>\n

Allowing them to expire helped bring down the cost of extending tax cuts for top earners through H.R. 1, she said. The sweeping tax law is known as either the \u201cbig beautiful\u201d or \u201cbig ugly\u201d bill, depending on the political leanings of the person speaking. All of Colorado\u2019s Republican delegation voted for the bill, while all of the Democrats voted against it.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey knew this devastation was coming and have failed to protect Coloradans from massive increases in insurance premiums,\u201d she said in a news release. \u201cCongress needs to take action now to extend enhanced premium tax credits.\u201d<\/p>\n

If Congress extended the higher subsidies, premiums would rise about 16%, and lower-income people wouldn\u2019t face any increase, according to the state insurance division.<\/p>\n

Theoretically, lawmakers could still act, but the window is closing rapidly. Open enrollment starts Saturday, and people who want coverage in January need to choose a plan by Dec. 15.<\/p>\n

Typically, the state would have released this information weeks ago<\/a> after determining whether rates that insurers submitted over the summer were reasonable.<\/p>\n

The legislature passed a bill in August to try to reduce rates, requiring insurance companies to submit a new set of numbers. The Division of Insurance then asked them to lay out how much lower their rates would be if Congress extended the subsidies. Those rates are now irrelevant, though extending the subsidies could limit how much of the increase customers have to pay.<\/p>\n

The Congressional Budget Office estimated<\/a> that extending the subsidies would increase the number of people with insurance by 3.8 million, but also raise the deficit by $350 billion over the next decade.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese premium increases are going to create impossible decisions for families across the state. We have sounded the alarm bells at every turn, but Congress\u2019 refusal to act means that Coloradans will be left with unacceptably high health insurance bills during a tightening time in the economy,\u201d Insurance Commissioner Michael Conway said in a news release.<\/p>\n

Nationwide, KFF estimated premiums would rise an average of 114%<\/a> for people who received subsidies. Other estimates put average premium increases at 93%<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The cost of job-based insurance also typically rises annually. In 2025, workers had to pay about 6% more in annual premiums than they did in the previous year, according to KFF<\/a>. Information about 2026 premiums isn\u2019t yet available.<\/p>\n

The legislature reduced the average impact from about 174% to 101% by appropriating $75 million to directly subsidize customers and by putting up to $50 million toward the state\u2019s reinsurance program, Conway said.<\/p>\n

Reinsurance acts as a backstop for insurers<\/a>, covering some of the cost of their most expensive customers\u2019 care. That means insurance companies aren\u2019t on the hook for as much money and can charge lower premiums, which in turn saves the federal government money it would have paid out in tax credits.<\/p>\n

The federal government allowed the state to use those savings to pay for reinsurance, but with lower tax credits, the savings are also lower<\/a>. The legislature\u2019s appropriation partially replaced the federal money Colorado won\u2019t receive.<\/p>\n

Though the legislature\u2019s efforts helped, the increase in premiums on the individual market will affect health care providers and people with job-based insurance over time, Conway said at a news conference last week. When fewer people have health insurance, hospitals provide more uncompensated care, and then pass the increased costs on to commercial insurance plans, he said.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere isn\u2019t a corner of our health care ecosystem that\u2019s going to be safe from the disaster that is coming our way,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get health news sent straight to your inbox.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Premiums will double next year for Coloradans who buy their health insurance on the state\u2019s individual market, with…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":337300,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[3232,4439,122319,9577,327,7030,166711,7033,8605,79,4440,454,49089,210,1141,3168,1142,3584,7337,1370,17259,50,16991,80,5620,98499,620,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-337299","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-health-care","8":"tag-budget","9":"tag-colorado","10":"tag-colorado-division-of-insurance","11":"tag-colorado-news","12":"tag-congress","13":"tag-congressional-budget-office","14":"tag-connect-for-health-colorado","15":"tag-democrats","16":"tag-denver","17":"tag-economy","18":"tag-front-range","19":"tag-government","20":"tag-government-shutdown","21":"tag-health","22":"tag-health-care","23":"tag-health-insurance","24":"tag-healthcare","25":"tag-hospitals","26":"tag-insurance","27":"tag-latest-headlines","28":"tag-national-politics","29":"tag-news","30":"tag-open-enrollment","31":"tag-politics","32":"tag-republicans","33":"tag-shutdown","34":"tag-tax","35":"tag-united-states","36":"tag-unitedstates","37":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115449185249660382","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337299"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337299\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/337300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}