{"id":339456,"date":"2025-10-28T23:39:10","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T23:39:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/339456\/"},"modified":"2025-10-28T23:39:10","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T23:39:10","slug":"met-sued-again-by-jewish-collectors-heirs-over-van-gogh-painting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/339456\/","title":{"rendered":"Met Sued Again by Jewish Collectors&#8217; Heirs Over Van Gogh Painting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tThe <a href=\"https:\/\/www.artnews.com\/t\/metropolitan-museum-of-art\/\" id=\"auto-tag_metropolitan-museum-of-art\" data-tag=\"metropolitan-museum-of-art\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Metropolitan Museum of Art<\/a> in New York is once again the subject of a lawsuit centering around a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.artnews.com\/t\/vincent-van-gogh\/\" id=\"auto-tag_vincent-van-gogh\" data-tag=\"vincent-van-gogh\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Vincent van Gogh<\/a> painting that the institution sold to a Greek collector in 1972.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tThat work, titled Olive Picking (1889), was only held by the New York institution for 16 years, with the Met having bought it in 1956 for $125,000, according to the suit, which was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/10\/28\/arts\/design\/jewish-heirs-sue-met-van-gogh-nazi-loot.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">first reported<\/a> by the New York Times.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tBut the lawsuit claims the painting should have never entered the Met\u2019s holdings in the first place, since the work allegedly once belonged to Hedwig and Frederick Stern, who could not take the work with them when they fled Nazi Germany.<\/p>\n<p>\t\tRelated Articles<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"c-lazy-image__img lrv-u-background-color-grey-lightest lrv-u-width-100p lrv-u-display-block lrv-u-height-auto\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artnews.com\/wp-content\/themes\/vip\/pmc-artnews-2019\/assets\/public\/lazyload-fallback.gif\" data-lazy-src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Statue-of-the-god-Min-1.jpg\" alt=\"An Egyptian statue missing a head and a phallus.\" data-lazy- data-lazy- height=\"\" width=\"\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tThe Sterns\u2019 heirs are now suing the Met and the Athens-based Basil &amp; Elise Goulandris Foundation, which is run by the namesake collector who bought the painting from the Met. Olive Picking is now on view there.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tIf the lawsuit sounds familiar, that\u2019s because its allegations have been fielded previously by the Stern heirs, who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.artnews.com\/art-news\/news\/jewish-collector-heirs-sue-met-van-gogh-painting-1234651052\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">sued the Met and the Goulandris Foundation<\/a> over this very work in 2022 in California. That lawsuit was eventually tossed out by a judge who claimed that the venue did not befit the accusations made. Now, the Sterns are trying their luck again in New York. (The Times reported that the suit was filed in \u201cFederal District Court in Manhattan\u201d; however, ARTnews was unable to locate a filing for the suit in any of New York\u2019s four district courts or in New York State court.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tAccording to the Times, the suit attempts to underscore that New York is the correct location for the action this time. Olive Picking, the suit says, was \u201crepeatedly and secretly trafficked, purchased and sold in and through New York.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tAs in the 2022 suit, the heirs claimed that the Met should have made a greater effort to determine the painting\u2019s provenance. Back then, the Met said it could not have known about the Sterns\u2019 ownership of the painting because \u201cthat information did not become available until several decades after the painting left the museum\u2019s collection.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tThe painting\u2019s sale in 1972 received scrutiny for different reasons. That year, the Times <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1972\/10\/02\/archives\/mets-sale-of-art-condemned-by-dealers.html\" target=\"_blank\">reported<\/a> that Marlborough Gallery purchased the van Gogh painting, as well as another by Henri Rousseau, leading the Art Dealers Association of America\u00a0to issue a statement in which it denounced the institution\u2019s sale of these works. The ADAA said the Met should have \u201cpublicly announced\u201d such a sale. (Thomas Hoving, then the museum\u2019s director, claimed he had worked on the advice of a curator at the institution and said he felt the Met could do \u201cwhatever we felt was wise.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ a-font-body-m     \">\n\tA Met spokesperson did not respond to ARTnews\u2019s request for comment. ARTnews has reached out to the Goulandris Foundation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is once again the subject of a lawsuit centering around&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":339457,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[648,1032,1033,171,50558,67,132,68,44110],"class_list":{"0":"post-339456","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-arts-and-design","8":"tag-arts","9":"tag-arts-and-design","10":"tag-design","11":"tag-entertainment","12":"tag-metropolitan-museum-of-art","13":"tag-united-states","14":"tag-unitedstates","15":"tag-us","16":"tag-vincent-van-gogh"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=339456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339456\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/339457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=339456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=339456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=339456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}