{"id":340263,"date":"2025-10-29T07:49:11","date_gmt":"2025-10-29T07:49:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/340263\/"},"modified":"2025-10-29T07:49:11","modified_gmt":"2025-10-29T07:49:11","slug":"paramount-never-made-an-offer-to-keep-taylor-sheridan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/340263\/","title":{"rendered":"Paramount Never Made an Offer to Keep Taylor Sheridan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tDavid Ellison was in an upbeat mood.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tParamount\u2019s new owner was on a private jet with his top executive team \u2014 including president Jeff Shell and Paramount Pictures co-chairs Dana Goldberg and Josh Greenstein \u2014 and had just sat down with the man who is the centerpiece of Paramount\u2019s TV content strategy: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hollywoodreporter.com\/t\/taylor-sheridan\/\" id=\"auto-tag_taylor-sheridan_1\" data-tag=\"taylor-sheridan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Taylor Sheridan<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tThe studio brass had flown to Texas to court Sheridan on his sprawling ranch shortly after the merger between Skydance Media and Paramount Global was finalized in August. Their objective was clear: Make Taylor Sheridan feel as if he\u2019s in good hands with this new leadership group. They thought the meeting went well. A source who spoke with one of the execs in attendance joked that the Paramount brass \u201ccouldn\u2019t keep up with him\u201d as the drinks flowed while Sheridan uncorked bottles.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tYet on Sunday, the news broke that Sheridan was jumping ship to NBCUniversal for a deal worth as much as $1 billion \u2014 depending on Sheridan\u2019s creative output during a five-year contract starting in 2029. He\u2019ll also have the opportunity to make films \u201cof all sizes\u201d with NBCU starting next year. <\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tThe seismic poach has sent the industry scrambling to answer a simple question: How did Paramount, the studio with the deepest pockets that recently inked massive, long-term agreements with South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone and a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fbusiness%2Fbusiness-news%2Fstranger-things-creators-matt-ross-duffer-paramount-deal-1236347953%2F&amp;data=05%7C02%7Cerik.hayden%40thr.com%7C77034cdb7c1a4a10282108de1638597e%7Ce950f25546e44144a778a6ff4f557492%7C0%7C0%7C638972628433986933%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=EOHRMyb10%2FxQvwHdX0oCZp8G7BvCoXhjcfHFYE%2FGabs%3D&amp;reserved=0\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">film and TV deal <\/a>with the Duffer brothers, fail to lock up one of the industry\u2019s biggest talents with an arguably perfect track record? But perhaps a better question is: How much did Paramount actually want to keep him?<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tFrom Sheridan\u2019s perspective, the partnership was rocky even before the merger. The writer-producer-director had been frustrated by Paramount\u2019s film division, which had rejected a feature script of his titled Capture the Flag. And when Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav courted Sheridan this year by offering to dust off his action-thriller script F.A.S.T., Sheridan ran into a roadblock when Paramount initially refused to let the rival studio make the film. Paramount wanted a 50\/50 split, sources say, and were rebuffed, though it eventually let the film go forward (1923 star Brandon Sklenar was cast in the lead, which also had to sting Paramount a bit).<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tOnce the studio changed hands, Paramount didn\u2019t give Sheridan a heads-up that it signed Nicole Kidman for a new series that could, in theory, conflict with her shooting schedule for his drama Lioness. Yellowstone famously fell behind partly due to star Kevin Costner committing to another project, so Sheridan has some history with being dealt major headaches with talent schedule conflicts. A source familiar with the situation says Paramount had planned to speak with Sheridan regarding the Kidman announcement but that Sheridan first learned about it through a dinner with they actress before they had the chance \u2014 but even that reasoning speaks to the studio not quite prioritizing its relationship with Sheridan.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tIn addition, Sheridan bristled at criticisms of his spending (particularly on Lioness, which received a belated \u2014 and what now looks like a last-ditch effort to salvage the relationship \u2014 third-season renewal a few weeks back).<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tAnd then there was that meeting between Sheridan and a crew of Paramount executives, a bombardment-of-brass tactic that felt cumbersome for the creative. \u201cIt wasn\u2019t a bad meeting,\u201d says a source in Sheridan\u2019s orbit. \u201cThey should\u2019ve come with three people \u2014 Ellison and two others and then sat down and really tried to connect with Taylor. That would\u2019ve meant a lot.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tOne insider pushed back on the idea that the executive team effort was Paramount\u2019s idea, noting that 101 Studios CEO David Glasser set the guest list. (Paramount, NBCUniversal, 101 Studios and Sheridan had no comment for this story.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tEither way, somebody else had been courting Sheridan with a more low-key style: NBCUniversal\u2019s savvy entertainment &amp; studios boss Donna Langley, who had multiple meetings with the hitmaker over the summer and who gradually became The Sheridan Whisperer. Initially, Langley approached Sheridan about a film deal, but the conversation expanded to include television and streaming in August when it became clear he was having serious doubts about reupping his TV deal with the new Paramount.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tWhen a contract is worth $1 billion, it may seem foolish to think Sheridan\u2019s decision might have been more personal than financial. But Sheridan values his independence to a rather enormous degree (The Hollywood Reporter\u2018s cover story on Sheridan two years ago was titled, \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hollywoodreporter.com\/tv\/tv-features\/taylor-sheridan-yellowstone-interview-1235519261\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Taylor Sheridan Does Whatever He Wants<\/a>,\u201d and that declaration has aged rather well). So it seems rather possible that Sheridan being put off by the Paramount team\u2019s approach could have been a significant factor. <\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tWhile on the Paramount side, Ellison is used to getting his own way (he is, after all, the son of the world\u2019s second-richest man, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, who is worth <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/billionaires\/\" target=\"_blank\">$342 billion<\/a>). One source suggests that Sheridan\u2019s controlling nature put off Ellison.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\t\u201c[Sheridan] was running the asylum\u201d that was Paramount+, the source says, claiming the previous regime had essentially ceded control of the platform to him and that Sheridan didn\u2019t want any accountability. \u201cEllison wants to run the show and he can\u2019t with Sheridan there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tAnother speculates that Paramount was getting out of the Sheridan business while the creator was at his peak: \u201cMy guess is Cindy [Holland], who\u2019s an adult, started asking some questions and David Glasser and Taylor and were like, \u2018We don\u2019t need anything questioned when we have these other suitors.\u2019 All their former contacts at Paramount were fired. They were getting away with a lot.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tPerhaps the biggest clue to Ellison\u2019s mindset was one simple fact: While sources disagree on some of the particulars in this story, all agree Paramount never actually made an offer to lock down Sheridan.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tBoth sides, therefore, made a sizable gamble: Ellison betting that Sheridan\u2019s winning streak is largely over; Langley betting there\u2019s plenty of gold left to be mined from the popular writer-director. On Yellowstone, John Dutton once said: \u201cIt\u2019s the one constant in life: You build something worth having, someone\u2019s gonna try to take it.\u201d Langley saw Sheridan as the thing worth having and went ahead and took it. <\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/  a-font-body-m     \">\n\tBorys Kit and Alex Weprin contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"David Ellison was in an upbeat mood. Paramount\u2019s new owner was on a private jet with his top&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":340264,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[171,12045,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-340263","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-entertainment","8":"tag-entertainment","9":"tag-taylor-sheridan","10":"tag-united-states","11":"tag-unitedstates","12":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115456361479082417","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340263\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/340264"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}