{"id":39110,"date":"2025-07-04T21:51:11","date_gmt":"2025-07-04T21:51:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/39110\/"},"modified":"2025-07-04T21:51:11","modified_gmt":"2025-07-04T21:51:11","slug":"unusual-social-security-administration-email-touts-big-beautiful-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/39110\/","title":{"rendered":"Unusual Social Security Administration email touts Big, Beautiful Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An email from the agency praised the bill, but only some recipients will see savings. Here&#8217;s what the legislation means for seniors.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0;left:0;right:0;bottom:0;width:100%;height:100%;z-index:2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/84289974007.jpg\"\/><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"vidplayicon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.gannett-cdn.com\/appservices\/universal-web\/universal\/icons\/icon-play-alt-white.svg\" alt=\"play\" style=\"height:40px;margin:auto 18px auto 27px;width:40px\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Social Security trust fund projected to run dry in less than 10 years<\/p>\n<p>The main trust fund used to pay Social Security benefits is projected to be depleted by 2033 if lawmakers no changes to the system.<\/p>\n<p>Straight Arrow News<\/p>\n<p>Social Security beneficiaries are accustomed to getting occasional emails from the program about matters like a benefits statement, but many were perplexed to get a different kind of message from the Social Security Administration late in the evening on Thursday, July 3.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Social Security Administration (SSA) is celebrating the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, a landmark piece of legislation that delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans,&#8221; the email, reviewed by USA TODAY, said. The message is referring to the legislative package of Trump&#8217;s priorities for cuts to taxes and spending on social programs that was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2025\/07\/03\/trump-tax-bill-house-vote-live-updates\/84450911007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">passed by the House of Representatives earlier that day<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The agency also published a news release titled &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ssa.gov\/news\/press\/releases\/2025\/#2025-07-03\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Social Security Applauds Passage of Legislation Providing Historic Tax Relief for Seniors<\/a>&#8221; that mirrored the email.<\/p>\n<p>Issuing an overtly political statement is unusual for the agency that oversees Social Security, which makes monthly payments to 73 million retirees, their survivors, and people with disabilities.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s completely unprecedented,&#8221; said Alex Lawson, executive director of\u00a0Social Security Works, a left-leaning advocacy organization focused on retirement benefits. &#8220;It&#8217;s an enormous breach of trust.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Lawson contends that the email praising Trump&#8217;s &#8220;Big, Beautiful Bill&#8221; violates the Hatch Act, a law against partisan political activity by federal government employees.<\/p>\n<p>The Social Security Administration did not immediately respond to inquiries seeking clarification. The White House referred USA TODAY&#8217;s request to SSA.<\/p>\n<p>A tax cut for some seniors<\/p>\n<p>During his campaign, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/politics\/elections\/2024\/10\/26\/social-security-policies-harris-trump\/75484288007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Trump promised to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits<\/a>. Instead, the just-passed bill \u2212 which Trump will sign in the late afternoon on July 4 \u2212 creates a $6,000 federal income tax deduction for Americans 65 and older.<\/p>\n<p>Since Social Security benefits are often a large part of seniors&#8217; income, some portion of those benefits will now be untaxed for those who qualify for the deduction.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It reduces the amount of Social Security benefits subject to tax, but it\u2019s not just for Social Security,&#8221; explains Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, a center-right think tank.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is a historic step forward for America\u2019s seniors,\u201d said Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, a former Wall Street executive appointed by Trump. \u201cFor nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/politics\/donald-trump\/\" data-autotag=\"26f031d1-9924-4f10-b4e6-019d076113d5\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">President Trump<\/a>\u2019s promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they\u2019ve earned.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>There are many Social Security recipients and seniors who won&#8217;t get a tax cut, however.<\/p>\n<p>At the other end of the spectrum, the deduction phases out for individuals making more than $75,000 or couples earning more than $150,000.<\/p>\n<p>Less benefit for those with lower incomes<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Lower-income earners benefit less than middle and upper-middle income households,&#8221; Watson said.<\/p>\n<p>On average, seniors in the bottom 20% income will save just 0.1% on their tax bill, <a href=\"https:\/\/taxfoundation.org\/blog\/no-tax-on-social-security-senior-tax-deduction\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">according to the Tax Policy Foundation&#8217;s analysis<\/a>, about one-tenth of what those in the middle of the income distribution will save.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It\u2019s been marketed as tax relief for seniors, but a lot of seniors are going to be surprised when they find out it doesn\u2019t apply to them,&#8221; Watson said. &#8220;I&#8217;m getting asked all the time by folks what this actually means for their tax situation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Social Security&#8217;s long-term funding problem<\/p>\n<p>And while some will soon benefit from lower taxes, the lost tax revenue could trigger a future automatic benefit cut for all beneficiaries.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s because Social Security benefits aren&#8217;t taxed like normal income. Instead of being used as general revenues, they go specifically into the trust funds that provide a backstop for Medicare and Social Security.<\/p>\n<p>The Social Security and Medicare Hospital Insurance trust funds <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/money\/2025\/06\/18\/social-security-shortfall-benefits-retirement\/84261121007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">were on track to be depleted by 2033<\/a>, but now that date will be moved up to 2032, because the senior citizen tax deduction will lop an estimated\u00a0$30 billion per year off the tax revenues those trust funds collect, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crfb.org\/blogs\/obbba-would-accelerate-social-security-medicare-insolvency\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget<\/a>. That, in turn, will trigger a future automatic benefit cut of 24% to all recipients, the centrist think tank projects.<\/p>\n<p>Those problems will only grow worse, Watson noted, if Congress renews, increases or makes permanent the senior tax deduction, when it expires in 2028.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a mixed bag for seniors, because some seniors will get some tax relief; the cost of that, though, is borne by the entire Social Security system,&#8221; Lawson said.<\/p>\n<p>Email comes amid customer-service &#8216;crisis&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Critics are pouncing on the message arriving at a time when the Social Security Administration has been suffering from problems with customer service.<\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration has reduced the agency&#8217;s staff and instituted <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/money\/2025\/04\/10\/social-security-update-phone-services\/83030139007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">new rules on identification for applicants<\/a>, resulting in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2025\/05\/06\/social-security-wait-times-longer\/83385829007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">average wait times that have ballooned<\/a> to 90 minutes.<\/p>\n<p>In June, the agency stopped making public real-time performance metrics about how long they will have to wait to reach a live person on the phone, and how long applications for new benefits take to be approved, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2025\/06\/26\/social-security-wait-times-controversy\/84334688007\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">USA TODAY reported on June 26<\/a>. Multiple times, USA TODAY reporters called Social Security&#8217;s 1-800 line they did not reach a live person before the line disconnected with no warning.<\/p>\n<p>Contributing: Sarah D. Wire<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"An email from the agency praised the bill, but only some recipients will see savings. Here&#8217;s what the&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":39111,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[5672,27385,31361,64,327,446,69,17174,25982,441,31362,17819,1539,5678,255,80,3389,700,5682,4995,6358,6360,5677,3161,711,3566,5681,277,4352,1439,31363,16566,646,766,67,132,68,4748,22060],"class_list":{"0":"post-39110","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-personal-finance","8":"tag-administration","9":"tag-branch","10":"tag-budgets","11":"tag-business","12":"tag-congress","13":"tag-donald","14":"tag-donald-trump","15":"tag-executive","16":"tag-executive-branch","17":"tag-federal","18":"tag-federal-budgets","19":"tag-house","20":"tag-of","21":"tag-pension","22":"tag-personal-finance","23":"tag-politics","24":"tag-representatives","25":"tag-retirement","26":"tag-retirement-u0026-pension","27":"tag-security","28":"tag-seniors","29":"tag-seniors-u0026-retirement","30":"tag-services","31":"tag-social","32":"tag-social-security","33":"tag-social-security-administration","34":"tag-social-services","35":"tag-trump","36":"tag-trump-administration","37":"tag-u-s","38":"tag-u-s-congress","39":"tag-u-s-house-of-representatives","40":"tag-u0026","41":"tag-unemployment","42":"tag-united-states","43":"tag-unitedstates","44":"tag-us","45":"tag-welfare","46":"tag-welfare-u0026-unemployment"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":"Validation failed: Text character limit of 500 exceeded"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39110"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39110\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39111"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}