{"id":454009,"date":"2025-12-17T20:34:32","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T20:34:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/454009\/"},"modified":"2025-12-17T20:34:32","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T20:34:32","slug":"the-worlds-most-valuable-womens-sports-teams-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/454009\/","title":{"rendered":"The World\u2019s Most Valuable Women\u2019s Sports Teams 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

Not long ago, women\u2019s franchises were given away in sales of men\u2019s teams. Today, there are 25 clubs valued at nine figures, collectively worth $5.6 billion.<\/p>\n

After three decades of existence,<\/strong> the WNBA finds itself in a precarious position<\/a> as team owners and the players\u2019 union battle over a new collective bargaining agreement. Coming off two seasons that set attendance<\/a> and TV ratings<\/a> records, athletes want a larger share<\/a> of the league\u2019s growing revenue, among other demands<\/a>. Owners, naturally, want to keep costs down as the league heads into its 30th season with a rosier business outlook than it has ever had.<\/p>\n

If the two sides can come to an agreement and preserve the momentum, they will have a long line of investors hoping to pour money into the league.<\/p>\n

That enthusiasm helps explain why, despite the threat of a work stoppage, the WNBA is boxing out other women\u2019s sports. On Forbes\u2019 inaugural list of the world\u2019s most valuable women\u2019s teams, the top five all come from the league\u2014led by the $400 million New York Liberty\u2014with all 12 WNBA franchises valued by Forbes ranking among the top 25.<\/p>\n

The rest of the 2025 list features eight National Women\u2019s Soccer League franchises, as well as five European soccer clubs: three from England\u2019s Women’s Super League and two from Spain\u2019s Liga F. All 25 ranked franchises are worth nine figures, with an average of $224 million and the NWSL\u2019s Seattle Reign FC setting the cutoff at $105 million, according to Forbes estimates.<\/p>\n

Combined, the 25 teams are valued at $5.6 billion\u2014a far cry from a few years ago, when women\u2019s franchises were sometimes thrown in as freebies in sales of men\u2019s teams under the same ownership. Before Michele Kang took control of the Washington Spirit<\/a> in 2022 at a $35 million valuation, for example, NWSL clubs traded for less than $5 million. Now, the Spirit rank 20th among women\u2019s sports teams at an estimated $130 million. The WNBA\u2019s Las Vegas Aces, meanwhile, have seen an even more dramatic rise, going from a $2 million price tag in their 2021 purchase by billionaire Las Vegas Raiders owner Mark Davis to a $310 million valuation today, No. 4 among women\u2019s teams.<\/p>\n

In those intervening years, the NWSL has added blue-chip sponsors including AT&T and Google, and the Kansas City Current have demonstrated the game-changing possibilities<\/a> of a team-owned stadium, projecting $45 million in 2025 revenue and expecting to break even on an operating basis. The league also signed new national broadcast agreements in 2023 for $240 million over four years, a package that is set to get a boost next season<\/a> with the expansion of the ESPN and CBS Sports deals and a new partnership with streaming service Victory+.<\/p>\n

The WNBA is one step ahead with its media rights, signing agreements in 2024 that will reportedly pay out $2.2 billion over 11 years, and several teams have already flirted with profitability. Forbes did not value the Golden State Valkyries this year as they took the court for their debut season, but the team was projecting at least $55 million<\/a> in revenue solely from sponsorships and ticket sales\u2014nearly $20 million more than any women\u2019s sports team had ever generated total in a year. And while Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark missed most of this season with injuries, the whole league has benefited<\/a> from the so-called Caitlin Clark Effect, including Clark herself, now one of the world\u2019s highest-paid female athletes<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The upward trajectory has lured some financial heavy hitters<\/a> into ownership groups, including billionaires Lauren Leichtman<\/a> and Gail Miller<\/a> and investment firms such as Carlyle and Sixth Street in the NWSL. Expansion fees also continue to skyrocket\u2014to $165 million for an NWSL franchise in Atlanta last month and $250 million for Cleveland, Detroit and Philadelphia in the WNBA in June.<\/p>\n

At the same time, investors are beginning to look across the Atlantic. Most notably, Chelsea, of the Women\u2019s Super League, sold a 10% stake in May to Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian at a valuation of roughly $250 million, which puts the club at No. 10 among the most valuable women\u2019s teams.<\/p>\n

The Ohanian deal aroused skepticism around the sports world, particularly because the price was at 17.4 times the team\u2019s publicly reported revenue of around $14.5 million for the previous season. Even by the standards of fast-growing women\u2019s leagues, that number would be an outlier\u2014by comparison, Forbes valued NWSL teams this year at an average of 8.8 times<\/a> trailing-season revenue, and the average multiple in the WNBA was a sky-high 14.4x. However, one insider tells Forbes that the Chelsea women\u2019s team\u2019s revenue, separated from the men\u2019s club of the same name, was actually closer to $25 million for the 2023-24 season, which would drop the multiple in the sale to a much more reasonable 10x.<\/p>\n

The situation highlights the murky finances of European women\u2019s teams, which often exist under the much larger umbrella of men\u2019s clubs and which, with a couple of notable exceptions such as Arsenal and Barcelona, have received little investment in their facilities or operations. In fact, amid concerns that men\u2019s Premier League teams were starting to treat their sister clubs like piggy banks\u2014selling off stakes to give themselves a financial lift and circumvent player payroll restrictions tied to their revenue\u2014the sport tweaked its rules<\/a> last month.<\/p>\n

For investors, European teams have other drawbacks relative to their American counterparts: a stagnating market for media rights<\/a>, second-rate stadiums, more restrictive ownership rules, a promotion-relegation system that can wipe out revenue for teams that are demoted, and a less commercialized sporting culture, where virtually any level of ticket price increase prompts fan outrage. Those issues align with the challenges that have depressed team values<\/a> on the men\u2019s side, but there is one key difference: In women\u2019s soccer, the U.S. is home to the world\u2019s best talent.<\/p>\n

That disparity isn\u2019t guaranteed to last, however. Some American stars, including Naomi Girma and Alyssa Thompson, have moved overseas in recent years, and Spirit forward Trinity Rodman is currently being wooed by European teams that aren\u2019t bound by a salary cap, with the NWSL reportedly scrambling<\/a> to introduce a new roster mechanism that would allow the league to hold on to her. If the balance of talent continues to shift to Europe, it would be a big score for a continent that is crazy about soccer but currently features a few haves and many more have-nots.<\/p>\n

Already, the top clubs in Europe have tremendous brand value, with names and logos that are recognized around the globe thanks to decades of success by their associated men\u2019s teams. For that reason, some soccer insiders believe that the women\u2019s clubs at Manchester City, Paris Saint-Germain and Bayern Munich might sell for $100 million if they were to hit the market, even though none of those teams have done much to justify that kind of price, with Deloitte listing their 2023-24 revenue at roughly $8 million, $5 million and $4 million.<\/p>\n

\u201cWomen\u2019s European football is like seed or pre-seed-type investments, whereas the NWSL for the most part is Series A, Series B, even Series C-type rounds,\u201d one insider says. \u201cWhat that means is those investors are bringing in a framework of venture capital, like how to think about pre-revenue or early-stage-revenue companies versus true revenue multiples.\u201d<\/p>\n

Then again, the team prices in the NWSL and the WNBA aren\u2019t necessarily firmly grounded in current economics, either. At a time when the U.S. has more billionaires than ever<\/a>, and with sports franchises having developed into a true asset class, the bids are much more a function of scarcity value\u2014and a bet on a bright future.<\/p>\n

\n

THE MOST VALUABLE WOMEN\u2019S SPORTS TEAMS 2025\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

#1. $400 million<\/strong>New York Liberty<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owners: Joe Tsai<\/strong><\/a> and Clara Wu Tsai<\/strong> | Revenue: $25 million<\/strong><\/p>\n

Steph Chambers\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

#2. $370 million<\/strong>Indiana Fever<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Herb Simon<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $32 million<\/strong>#3. $330 million<\/strong>Seattle Storm<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owners: Lisa Brummel, Ginny Gilder, Dawn Trudeau<\/strong> | Revenue: $21 million<\/strong>#4. $310 million<\/strong>Las Vegas Aces<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Mark Davis<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $22 million<\/strong>#5. $300 million<\/strong>Phoenix Mercury<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Mat Ishbia<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $25 million<\/strong>#6. $280 million<\/strong>Angel City FC<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owners: Willow Bay and <\/strong>Bob Iger<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $35 million<\/strong>#7. $275 million<\/strong>Kansas City Current<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owners: Angie and Chris Long<\/strong> | Revenue: $36 million<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jay Biggerstaff\/NWSL\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

#8. $260 million<\/strong>Arsenal<\/strong>League: Women\u2019s Super League<\/strong> | Owner: Stanley Kroenke<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $19 million<\/strong>#9. $255 million<\/strong>Barcelona<\/strong>League: Liga F<\/strong> | Owners: club members<\/strong> | Revenue: $19 million<\/strong>#10 (tie). $250 million<\/strong>Chelsea<\/strong>League: Women\u2019s Super League<\/strong> | Owners: Todd Boehly<\/strong><\/a>, Clearlake Capital, Alexis Ohanian<\/strong> | Revenue: $25 million<\/strong><\/p>\n

Catherine Ivill\/AMA\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

#10 (tie). $250 million<\/strong>Dallas Wings<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Bill Cameron<\/strong> | Revenue: $15 million<\/strong>#12. $240 million<\/strong>Chicago Sky<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Michael Alter<\/strong> | Revenue: $16 million<\/strong>#13. $235 million<\/strong>Los Angeles Sparks<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Eric Holoman<\/strong> | Revenue: $16 million<\/strong>#14. $230 million<\/strong>Minnesota Lynx<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owners: Glen Taylor<\/strong><\/a>, <\/strong>Marc Lore<\/strong><\/a>, Alex Rodriguez<\/strong> | Revenue: $16 million<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ellen Schmidt\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

#15. $205 million<\/strong>Washington Mystics<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Ted Leonsis<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $13 million<\/strong>#16. $200 million<\/strong>Connecticut Sun<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owner: Mohegan Tribe<\/strong> | Revenue: $14 million<\/strong>#17. $190 million<\/strong>Atlanta Dream<\/strong>League: WNBA<\/strong> | Owners: Larry Gottesdiener, Suzanne Abair, Renee Montgomery<\/strong> | Revenue: $11 million<\/strong>#18. $170 million<\/strong>Bay FC<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owner: Sixth Street<\/strong> | Revenue: $21 million<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kelley L Cox\/NWSL\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

#19. $165 million<\/strong>San Diego Wave FC<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owner: Lauren Leichtman<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $24 million<\/strong>#20. $130 million<\/strong>Washington Spirit<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owner: Michele Kang<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $15 million<\/strong>#21. $120 million<\/strong>Portland Thorns FC<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owners: Lisa Bhathal Merage and Alex Bhathal<\/strong> | Revenue: $17 million<\/strong>#22. $115 million<\/strong>Manchester United<\/strong>League: Women\u2019s Super League<\/strong> | Owners: Glazer family<\/strong><\/a>, <\/strong>Jim Ratcliffe<\/strong><\/a> | Revenue: $12 million<\/strong><\/p>\n

Poppy Townson\/MUFC\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

#23 (tie). $110 million<\/strong>NJ\/NY Gotham FC<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owner: Carolyn Tisch Blodgett<\/strong> | Revenue: $9 million<\/strong>#23 (tie). $110 million<\/strong>Real Madrid<\/strong>League: Liga F<\/strong> | Owners: club members<\/strong> | Revenue: $11 million<\/strong>#25. $105 million<\/strong>Seattle Reign FC<\/strong>League: NWSL<\/strong> | Owners: Carlyle<\/strong><\/a>, Adrian Hanauer<\/strong> | Revenue: $10 million<\/strong>METHODOLOGY<\/strong><\/p>\n

The 50 Most Valuable Women\u2019s Sports Teams reflect Forbes\u2019 2025 WNBA<\/a> and NWSL<\/a> team valuation lists, as well as new estimates for individual European soccer teams. (The Golden State Valkyries, a WNBA expansion club that began play in May 2025, and NWSL expansion clubs in Boston and Denver that are set to begin play in 2026 were omitted from this year\u2019s rankings.) Revenue estimates are rounded to the nearest $1 million and reflect the 2024 season for WNBA and NWSL teams and the 2023-24 season for European soccer teams. Playoff games were excluded from the revenue calculations for the WNBA and the NWSL.<\/p>\n

The team values are enterprise values (equity plus net debt) and include the economics of each team\u2019s stadium or arena but not the value of the real estate itself. The valuations similarly take into account ancillary revenue streams that are captured in the team\u2019s financial statements, such as income from sponsorships or events at the team\u2019s practice facility, without directly measuring the value of those other assets.<\/p>\n

To compile the valuations, Forbes examined recent transaction data and spoke with industry insiders including team and league executives, team owners, institutional investors, investment bankers, advisors and consultants. The revenue estimates for the European women\u2019s soccer teams are taken from Deloitte\u2019s 2025 Football Money League report<\/a>, with the exception of Chelsea, whose revenue was adjusted from roughly $15 million in the Deloitte report (and in the team\u2019s annual filing with the U.K.\u2019s Companies House) to $25 million.<\/p>\n

All figures are in U.S. dollars. Revenue estimates for European soccer teams were converted based on exchange rates as of June 30, 2024 (\u00a31 = $1.26; \u20ac1 = $1.07).<\/p>\n

With reporting by Justin Birnbaum<\/a> and Justin Teitelbaum<\/a>.<\/p>\n

More From Forbes<\/strong>ForbesInside Michele Kang\u2019s Plan To Revolutionize Women\u2019s Soccer: \u2018Not Some Corporate DEI Project\u2019By Justin Birnbaum<\/a>ForbesThe Future Of Women\u2019s Pro Soccer Is Being Built In The Heart Of Kansas CityBy Justin Birnbaum<\/a>ForbesWhy The Golden State Valkyries Will Be The WNBA\u2019s Most Valuable Team Next YearBy Matt Craig<\/a>ForbesThe World\u2019s Highest-Paid Female Athletes 2025By Justin Birnbaum<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Not long ago, women\u2019s franchises were given away in sales of men\u2019s teams. Today, there are 25 clubs…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":454010,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[234,208211,208209,109542,1520,5468,62,67,132,68,232,208210,131678,113129],"class_list":{"0":"post-454009","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-wnba","8":"tag-indiana-fever","9":"tag-liga-f","10":"tag-most-valuable-womens-sports-teams","11":"tag-national-womens-soccer-league","12":"tag-new-york-liberty","13":"tag-nwsl","14":"tag-sports","15":"tag-united-states","16":"tag-unitedstates","17":"tag-us","18":"tag-wnba","19":"tag-womens-sports-team-values","20":"tag-womens-super-league","21":"tag-wsl"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115736822595950643","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=454009"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454009\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/454010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=454009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=454009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=454009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}