{"id":460969,"date":"2025-12-20T22:58:14","date_gmt":"2025-12-20T22:58:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/460969\/"},"modified":"2025-12-20T22:58:14","modified_gmt":"2025-12-20T22:58:14","slug":"scientists-just-discovered-the-oldest-human-footprint-ever-found-hidden-in-chilean-mud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/460969\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientists Just Discovered the Oldest Human Footprint Ever Found, Hidden in Chilean Mud"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A fossilized human footprint found in southern Chile has been dated to <strong>15,600 years ago<\/strong>, making it the <strong>oldest known footprint in the Americas<\/strong>. The discovery suggests that humans may have reached South America <strong>more than 1,000 years earlier<\/strong> than previously believed.<\/p>\n<p>Unearthed in the city of Osorno, the footprint was first discovered in 2010 but only recently confirmed after nearly a decade of analysis. If validated, the find could reshape our understanding of early human migration across the continent.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Dating a Footprint From the Distant Past<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The fossil was studied by researchers from Universidad Austral de Chile and led by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/profile\/Karen-Moreno-9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Karen Moreno<\/a>, whose findings were <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosone\/article?id=10.1371\/journal.pone.0213572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">published in PLOS One<\/a>. Prior to this discovery, most scientific consensus held that human presence in South America began <strong>after the last Ice Age<\/strong>, with the Monte Verde site in Chile\u2014<strong>dated to about 14,600 years ago<\/strong>\u2014long considered the continent\u2019s earliest sign of habitation. <\/p>\n<p>According to Moreno, the newly confirmed footprint predates the Monte Verde site and stands as the <strong>first official evidence of human activity in South America older than 12,000 years<\/strong>. While sites of a similar age\u2014such as one in Texas with evidence dating back 15,500 years\u2014have been reported in North America, the Chilean discovery remains the <strong>earliest direct physical proof of human presence<\/strong> on the continent. As she explained: <\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cLittle by little in South America we\u2019re starting to find sites with evidence of human presence, but this is the oldest in the Americas.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"755\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Photo-of-the-footprint-feature-at-Pilauco-sediment-lump-in-the-trackbed-star-scaled.png.webp.webp\" alt=\"Photo Of The Footprint Feature At Pilauco; Sediment Lump In The Trackbed (star).\" class=\"wp-image-113778\"\/>Photo of the footprint feature at Pilauco; sediment lump in the trackbed (star). Credit: PLOS ONE<\/p>\n<p>A Fossil-Rich Layer That Locks In the Footprint\u2019s Age<\/p>\n<p>Since the print itself couldn\u2019t be directly dated, researchers analyzed the <strong>sediment layer<\/strong> in which it was found. That layer contained <strong>seeds<\/strong>, <strong>wood fragments<\/strong>, and even part of a <strong>mastodon skull<\/strong>, which helped scientists determine the fossil\u2019s age. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-chile-footprint\/oldest-human-footprint-found-in-the-americas-confirmed-in-chile-researcher-idUSKCN1S22D9\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">As mentioned by Reuters<\/a>, this multi-layered approach placed the footprint firmly at <strong>15,600 years old<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The site was also littered with the bones of <strong>mastodons<\/strong>, <strong>horses<\/strong>, and other extinct animals. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iflscience.com\/this-could-be-the-oldest-surviving-human-footprint-in-the-americans-52286\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IFL Science reported<\/a> that <strong>flakes of stone<\/strong> were found nearby as well, suggesting the area may have been a hunting ground. These contextual clues further supported the hypothesis that the footprint belonged to a human actively engaged with the environment, rather than being an accidental or natural formation.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"800\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Ancient-footprint-shown-with-drying-cracks-after-excavation-in-Osorno-1200x800.jpg.webp.webp\" alt=\"Ancient Footprint Shown With Drying Cracks After Excavation In Osorno.\" class=\"wp-image-113779\"  \/>Ancient footprint shown with drying cracks after excavation in Osorno. Credit: Universidad Austral de Chile, Laboratorio de Sitio Pilauco\/Karen Moreno, Juan Enrique Bostelma<\/p>\n<p>Proving It Was Human, Not Animal<\/p>\n<p>Determining whether the impression was truly human took years of detailed testing. Moreno and her team conducted <strong>nine experiments<\/strong> to evaluate the kind of pressure required to form the <a href=\"https:\/\/dailygalaxy.com\/2025\/04\/footprint-found-500-million-year-old-rock\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"86035\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">footprint<\/a> in similar sediments. The results pointed to a <strong>barefoot adult male<\/strong> weighing around <strong>155 pounds<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The footprint matched no known animal pattern. Its shape, proportions, and pressure distribution closely resembled that of a modern human, eliminating the likelihood of it being created by an animal or by natural erosion. Based on the analysis, the team classified it as <strong>Hominipes modernus<\/strong>, a scientific designation for prints attributed to humans or closely related species.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A fossilized human footprint found in southern Chile has been dated to 15,600 years ago, making it the&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":460970,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[159,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-460969","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-science","8":"tag-science","9":"tag-united-states","10":"tag-unitedstates","11":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/460969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=460969"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/460969\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/460970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=460969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=460969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=460969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}