{"id":475893,"date":"2025-12-27T23:30:15","date_gmt":"2025-12-27T23:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/475893\/"},"modified":"2025-12-27T23:30:15","modified_gmt":"2025-12-27T23:30:15","slug":"can-you-tell-human-faces-from-ai-most-people-cant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/475893\/","title":{"rendered":"Can you tell human faces from AI? Most people can&#8217;t"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>You can\u2019t hide your lying AIs.<\/p>\n<p>Not only is AI slop taking over the internet, but it\u2019s becoming indistinguishable from the real deal. Scientists have found that people can\u2019t tell the different between human and AI-generated faces without special training, per a dystopian study published in the journal <a href=\"https:\/\/royalsocietypublishing.org\/rsos\/article\/12\/11\/250921\/234220\/Training-human-super-recognizers-detection-and\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Royal Society Open Science.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u201cGenerative adversarial networks (GANs) can create realistic synthetic faces, which have the potential to be used for nefarious purposes,\u201d wrote the researchers.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, TikTok users blew the whistle on <a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2025\/03\/07\/tech\/ai-generated-doctors-are-duping-tiktok-users-with-fake-medical-advice-heres-how-to-spot-a-horrifying-fraud\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AI-generated deepfake doctors<\/a>\u00a0who were scamming social media users with unfounded medical advice.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it was encouraging that our kind of quite short training procedure increased performance in both groups quite a lot,\u201d\u00a0said lead author Katie Gray. FAMILY STOCK \u2013 stock.adobe.com<\/p>\n<p>In fact, these faces from concentrate have become so convincing that people are duped into the thinking the counterfeit countenances are real more than the genuine artifact, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.livescience.com\/health\/psychology\/ai-is-getting-better-and-better-at-generating-faces-but-you-can-train-to-spot-the-fakes\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Livescience report.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>To prevent people from being duped, researchers are attempting to design a five-minute training regimen to help users unmask the AI-mposters, according to lead study author\u00a0Katie Gray, an associate professor in psychology at the University of Reading in the UK.<\/p>\n<p>These trainings help people catch glitches\u00a0in AI-generated faces, such as the face having a middle tooth, a bizarre hairline or unnatural-looking skin texture. These false visages are often more proportional than their bonafide counterparts.<\/p>\n<p>The participants\u2019 powers of AI detection improved substantially after the short training. RSOS<\/p>\n<p>The team tested out the technique by running a series of experiments contrasting the performance of a group of typical recognizers and super recognizers \u2014 defined as those who excel at facial recognition tasks. <\/p>\n<p>The latter participants, who were sourced from the\u00a0Greenwich Face and Voice Recognition Laboratory\u00a0volunteer database, had reportedly ranked in the top 2% of individuals in exams where they had to recall unfamiliar faces.<\/p>\n<p>In the first test, organizers displayed a face onscreen and gave participants ten seconds to determine if it was real or fake. Typical recognizers spotted only 30% of fakes while super recognizers caught just 41% \u2014 less than if they\u2019d just randomly guessed.<\/p>\n<p>The second experiment was almost identical, except it involved a new group of guinea pigs who had received the aforementioned five-minute training on how to spot errors in AI-generated faces.<\/p>\n<p>The test takers were shown 10 faces and evaluated on their AI-detection accuracy in real time, culminating in a review of common rendering mistakes.<\/p>\n<p>Sophisticated AI-generated images have allowed bad actors to dupe people online. Midjourney<\/p>\n<p>When they participated in the original experiment, their accuracy had improved with super recognizers IDing 64% of the fugazi faces while their normal counterparts recognized 51%. <\/p>\n<p>Trained participants also took longer to examine the faces before giving their answer.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it was encouraging that our kind of quite short training procedure increased performance in both groups quite a lot,\u201d\u00a0said Gray.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, there are a few caveats to the study, namely that the participants were put to the test immediately after training, so it was unclear how much they would\u2019ve retained had they waited longer.<\/p>\n<p>Nonetheless, equipping people with the tools to distinguish humans from bots is essential in light of the plethora of AI-mpersonators flooding social media.<\/p>\n<p>And the tech\u2019s chameleonic prowess isn\u2019t just visual. <\/p>\n<p>Recently, researchers claimed that language bot <a href=\"http:\/\/bots are no longer discernable from their human counterparts\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ChatGPT had passed the Turing Test,<\/a> meaning it is effectively no longer discernible from its flesh-and-blood brethren.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"You can\u2019t hide your lying AIs. Not only is AI slop taking over the internet, but it\u2019s becoming&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":475894,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[738,97905,23988,16978,242,158,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-475893","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-technology","8":"tag-artificial-intelligence","9":"tag-deepfakes","10":"tag-scams","11":"tag-study-says","12":"tag-tech","13":"tag-technology","14":"tag-united-states","15":"tag-unitedstates","16":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115794140414007832","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/475893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=475893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/475893\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/475894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=475893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=475893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=475893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}