{"id":499660,"date":"2026-01-07T20:01:09","date_gmt":"2026-01-07T20:01:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/499660\/"},"modified":"2026-01-07T20:01:09","modified_gmt":"2026-01-07T20:01:09","slug":"monterey-county-scraps-proposed-salinas-mental-health-campus-over-cost-location-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/499660\/","title":{"rendered":"Monterey County scraps proposed Salinas mental health campus over cost, location concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe Monterey County Board of Supervisors voted to reject a proposed mental health facility in the Creekbridge area of Salinas after hours of public comment and concerns over the project&#8217;s rising costs.Supervisors considered several options, including scaled-back versions of the facility, before ultimately deciding to eliminate the project entirely. The proposed facility was intended to be a 96-bed campus near homes in the Creekbridge neighborhood. Many residents expressed their opposition, citing safety concerns and the inappropriateness of the location. Yolanda Hayes, a local resident, shared the sentiment of many neighbors, saying, &#8220;Most of the people that I spoke with are seniors, and they were just heartbroken that they were going to have to live by this facility.&#8221; Another resident, Nina Perez, expressed relief at the decision, stating, &#8220;As a Creek Bridge resident, I feel relaxed that we can, you know, begin to move on in wonder with the community is going to put in our backyard.&#8221;Despite the opposition, some community members argued that such services are essential for the county. &#8220;Having a facility like this in our county of Monterey would be a tremendous asset,&#8221; one supporter said.The supervisors&#8217; decision was heavily influenced by the project&#8217;s escalating costs, which had increased from an initial $45 million to an estimated $172 million. Glenn Church, a member of the board, highlighted the financial concerns, saying, &#8220;This project as I recall, has gone from $50 million initially to $70 million to $172 million.&#8221;Ultimately, the supervisors concluded that the plan, given its cost and location, was not viable. Church added, &#8220;I hope I don&#8217;t ever see a project come forth like this that is presented to us over a period of a few years and the numbers are so unstable.&#8221;The board emphasized the ongoing need for mental health services but stressed the importance of finding a financially sensible plan that aligns with community interests.\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<strong class=\"dateline\">SALINAS, Calif. \u2014<\/strong> \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>The Monterey County Board of Supervisors voted to reject a proposed mental health facility in the Creekbridge area of Salinas after hours of public comment and concerns over the project&#8217;s rising costs.<\/p>\n<p>Supervisors considered several options, including scaled-back versions of the facility, before ultimately deciding to eliminate the project entirely. The proposed facility was intended to be a 96-bed campus near homes in the Creekbridge neighborhood. <\/p>\n<p>Many residents expressed their opposition, citing safety concerns and the inappropriateness of the location. <\/p>\n<p>Yolanda Hayes, a local resident, shared the sentiment of many neighbors, saying, &#8220;Most of the people that I spoke with are seniors, and they were just heartbroken that they were going to have to live by this facility.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Another resident, Nina Perez, expressed relief at the decision, stating, &#8220;As a Creek Bridge resident, I feel relaxed that we can, you know, begin to move on in wonder with the community is going to put in our backyard.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Despite the opposition, some community members argued that such services are essential for the county. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Having a facility like this in our county of Monterey would be a tremendous asset,&#8221; one supporter said.<\/p>\n<p>The supervisors&#8217; decision was heavily influenced by the project&#8217;s escalating costs, which had increased from an initial $45 million to an estimated $172 million. <\/p>\n<p>Glenn Church, a member of the board, highlighted the financial concerns, saying, &#8220;This project as I recall, has gone from $50 million initially to $70 million to $172 million.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the supervisors concluded that the plan, given its cost and location, was not viable. Church added, &#8220;I hope I don&#8217;t ever see a project come forth like this that is presented to us over a period of a few years and the numbers are so unstable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The board emphasized the ongoing need for mental health services but stressed the importance of finding a financially sensible plan that aligns with community interests.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Monterey County Board of Supervisors voted to reject a proposed mental health facility in the Creekbridge area&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":499661,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[3387,18573,13332,283,6808,210,18084,224289,110436,517,95214,224290,88788,8744,95727,224291,89791,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-499660","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-mental-health","8":"tag-board","9":"tag-community-member","10":"tag-cost","11":"tag-decision","12":"tag-facility","13":"tag-health","14":"tag-local-resident","15":"tag-location-concern","16":"tag-many-resident","17":"tag-mental-health","18":"tag-mental-health-facility","19":"tag-monterey-county-scrap","20":"tag-opposition","21":"tag-project","22":"tag-public-comment","23":"tag-salinas-mental-health-campus","24":"tag-supervisor","25":"tag-united-states","26":"tag-unitedstates","27":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115855601453928825","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/499660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=499660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/499660\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/499661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=499660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=499660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=499660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}