{"id":51299,"date":"2025-07-09T11:45:10","date_gmt":"2025-07-09T11:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/51299\/"},"modified":"2025-07-09T11:45:10","modified_gmt":"2025-07-09T11:45:10","slug":"after-disputed-cottage-sale-executors-found-personally-liable-for-legal-costs-when-they-appealed-their-removal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/51299\/","title":{"rendered":"After disputed cottage sale, executors found personally liable for legal costs when they appealed their removal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a style=\"display:block\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/resizer\/v2\/PECHBIEVXNDO5LPTXC4ROF52UQ.jpg?auth=f68de1a48f99fc8f2d1bce3116321dc33d38959273de9b95f6ce559fd694316b&amp;width=600&amp;height=400&amp;quality=80&amp;smart=true\" aria-haspopup=\"true\" data-photo-viewer-index=\"0\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Open this photo in gallery:<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"figcap-text\">The estate beneficiary claimed the executors had not kept him informed of their intention to sell the family cottage and made it difficult for him to collect his personal belongings before the property was sold.flyzone\/iStockPhoto \/ Getty Images<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Co-executors are being held personally liable for $21,000 in costs associated with their unsuccessful appeal of a lower court decision that removed them as trustees of an estate, following a dispute over a cottage sale and other conflicts with the beneficiary.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">While executors are generally indemnified for costs related to estate litigation, the Ontario Court of Appeal found the former co-executors\u2019 appeal \u201cwas unnecessary, not brought in the interest of the estate, and should attract personal cost consequences.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onca\/doc\/2025\/2025onca360\/2025onca360.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onca\/doc\/2025\/2025onca360\/2025onca360.html\">MacBeth Estate v. MacBeth<\/a>, the beneficiary, John MacBeth, brought a motion before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice last year seeking to remove Robert and Catherine Hurst as trustees of his mother\u2019s estate and to have himself appointed as sole replacement trustee. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Mr. MacBeth claimed the executors hadn\u2019t told him they intended to sell the family cottage and that they triggered capital gains taxes that could have been avoided.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Before the hearing date, the executors offered to step down and be replaced by Mr. MacBeth as executor, with a holdback of $450,000 to cover estate administration costs. Mr. MacBeth offered to settle under the same terms but with a holdback of $100,000. Each party rejected the other\u2019s offer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Ruth MacBeth died in 2009 with a will naming Mr. and Ms. Hurst as executors and Ms. MacBeth\u2019s children, John and Wendy MacBeth, as alternates. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">At the time of the motion, with most of the estate already distributed to other beneficiaries, Mr. MacBeth was effectively the only remaining beneficiary.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">At the Superior Court, Mr. MacBeth argued that animosity between the executors and himself had reached the point at which he no longer trusted their administration of the estate and that ongoing litigation was diminishing the estate\u2019s value.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">He also claimed the executors had not kept him informed of their intention to sell the family cottage and made it difficult for him to collect his personal belongings before the property was sold.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Finally, Mr. MacBeth provided the court with an expert opinion suggesting the executors had unnecessarily triggered a $600,000 capital gains tax by selling the cottage to a third party rather than transferring it to him as part of the estate administration. The executors did not challenge the expert opinion, and it was accepted by the court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The executors opposed the motion and sought an adjournment to have more time to respond, as one of the executors, Mr. Hurst, had been recently diagnosed with cancer. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The Superior Court judge dismissed the motion for adjournment, noting the executors had been aware of Mr. MacBeth\u2019s intention to bring a motion to remove them as trustees for more than a year. She also said that, based on the material the executors had filed with the court, it was unclear what allegations they were disputing or what evidence they would introduce if they were granted more time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">In contrast, Mr. Hurst \u201cwould suffer real prejudice\u201d if the adjournment were granted, as the estate had already taken years to administer and he\u2019d been effectively paying both parties\u2019 legal costs \u2013 his own, personally, and those of the executors, through his stake in the estate. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">On the question of the executors\u2019 removal, the judge said the evidence supported a finding that the executors would mishandle the estate moving forward, and the disharmony between the executors and the beneficiary warranted their removal. Mr. MacBeth was appointed as the replacement executor.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The judge also ordered that $50,000 be held back from the estate to cover costs related to the passing of accounts, which is the term for the accounting of estate administration in court. <\/p>\n<p>Unsuccessful appeal<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">In September, 2024, Mr. MacBeth died, with the executor of his estate becoming the replacement executor for Ruth MacBeth\u2019s estate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">In May 2025, Mr. and Ms. Hurst appealed the Superior Court judge\u2019s decision, arguing she had erred in denying their request for an adjournment, in their removal as trustee, and by not hearing submissions before determining the holdback amount. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">In dismissing their appeal, the Ontario Court of Appeal found the Superior Court justice had properly exercised her judicial discretion both to deny the adjournment and remove the executors. The court also noted that the former executors had recourse to recover expenses reasonably incurred as part of their administration of the estate beyond the set holdback amount.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The appeals court ordered the former executors to pay $21,000 to the executor of Mr. MacBeth\u2019s estate as a partial indemnification of his legal costs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Krystyne Rusek, an estate lawyer with Speigel Nichols Fox LLP in Mississauga, says executors are generally indemnified for legal fees \u2013 including for litigation \u2013 from the estate if the fees were reasonable, in terms of the amount, and proper, meaning incurred in the course of administering the estate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">However, \u201cif you take steps to protect your interests as estate trustee, whether to protect anticipated compensation, or to avoid a claim by the beneficiaries, understand that you could be held personally liable for legal costs of the beneficiaries, and will not be indemnified by the estate,\u201d she says.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Open this photo in gallery: The estate beneficiary claimed the executors had not kept him informed of their&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":51300,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[8837,64,38494,255,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-51299","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-personal-finance","8":"tag-appwebview","9":"tag-business","10":"tag-globe-advisor","11":"tag-personal-finance","12":"tag-united-states","13":"tag-unitedstates","14":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114823110761657830","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51299"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51299\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}