{"id":513400,"date":"2026-01-13T15:53:18","date_gmt":"2026-01-13T15:53:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/513400\/"},"modified":"2026-01-13T15:53:18","modified_gmt":"2026-01-13T15:53:18","slug":"nyc-to-join-other-jurisdictions-in-requiring-employer-pay-data-reporting-employee-rights-labour-relations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/513400\/","title":{"rendered":"NYC To Join Other Jurisdictions In Requiring Employer Pay Data Reporting &#8211; Employee Rights\/ Labour Relations"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: <\/p>\n<ul>&#13;<\/p>\n<li>within Environment topic(s)<\/li>\n<p>&#13;\n                    <\/ul>\n<p>After the NYC Council voted to override a veto by former Mayor&#13;<br \/>\nEric Adams, New York City will soon require large employers to&#13;<br \/>\nreport pay data by employee race, ethnicity, and gender.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NYC Pay Data Reporting Coverage and&#13;<br \/>\nRequirements<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As we <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaq.com\/redirection.asp?article_id=1730306&amp;company_id=7032&amp;redirectaddress=https:\/\/www.lawandtheworkplace.com\/2025\/10\/nyc-council-approves-bills-to-require-employer-pay-data-reporting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">previously reported<\/a>, while these new&#13;<br \/>\nrequirement take effect immediately, covered employers\u2014i.e.,&#13;<br \/>\nemployers with 200 or more employees in New York City (including&#13;<br \/>\nfull-time, part-time and temporary employees)\u2014will have some&#13;<br \/>\nbreathing room, as the City must first implement the process for&#13;<br \/>\nthe submission of such information.<\/p>\n<p>First, the law requires that an agency be designated within one&#13;<br \/>\nyear of the law taking effect (i.e., by December 4, 2026), at which&#13;<br \/>\npoint the designated agency has one year to develop a standardized&#13;<br \/>\nfillable form for covered employers to submit pay reports.<\/p>\n<p>Within one year of the designated agency publishing the&#13;<br \/>\nstandardized form, and annually thereafter, covered employers must&#13;<br \/>\nsubmit to the designated agency:<\/p>\n<ul>&#13;<\/p>\n<li>A pay report that includes current information corresponding&#13;<br \/>\nwith the categories of information required by the Equal Employment&#13;<br \/>\nOpportunity Commission (EEOC) in the EEO-1 &#8220;Component 2&#8243;&#13;<br \/>\nreporting requirements for reporting years 2017 and 2018; and<\/li>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<\/p>\n<li>A separate signed statement confirming the submission and&#13;<br \/>\naccuracy of the pay report.<\/li>\n<p>&#13;\n<\/ul>\n<p>As noted above, the NYC pay report will track pay data&#13;<br \/>\ninformation that private sector employers with 100 or more&#13;<br \/>\nemployees, as well as certain federal contractors\/subcontractors,&#13;<br \/>\nwere previously required to compile and submit to the EEOC as part&#13;<br \/>\nof annual EEO-1 reporting requirements for years 2017 and 2018.&#13;<br \/>\nThis information included aggregate pay and hours-worked data&#13;<br \/>\nacross 12 pay bands broken out by job category and by race,&#13;<br \/>\nethnicity, and sex.<\/p>\n<p>Component 2 pay data reporting has not been required as part of&#13;<br \/>\nannual EEO-1 reporting since 2020, when collection of the 2018 data&#13;<br \/>\nclosed and the EEOC published a Federal Register notice reflecting&#13;<br \/>\nit could not seek approval to continue Component 2 reporting. As&#13;<br \/>\nsuch, the NYC law will effectively reinstate an obligation for&#13;<br \/>\nthose employers covered by the City law that has not existed for&#13;<br \/>\nseveral years. It is further noted that the designated agency would&#13;<br \/>\nbe authorized to adopt modifications for the NYC pay report, which&#13;<br \/>\ncould include (but would not be limited to) inclusion of reporting&#13;<br \/>\noptions accounting for different gender identities beyond male and&#13;<br \/>\nfemale.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How Pay Data Will be Compiled and Used<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>While employers will have an option to submit the pay report&#13;<br \/>\nanonymously, the separate signed statement must identify the&#13;<br \/>\nemployer. Within one year after covered employers submit their pay&#13;<br \/>\nreports, and annually thereafter, the designated agency will&#13;<br \/>\nconduct a pay equity study and publish the data contained in the&#13;<br \/>\nreports in the aggregate, and in a manner that does not reveal a&#13;<br \/>\ncovered employers&#8217; or employee&#8217;s identifying&#13;<br \/>\ninformation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Penalties for Noncompliance<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Violations of the law will subject employers to civil penalties,&#13;<br \/>\nas follows:<\/p>\n<ul>&#13;<\/p>\n<li>For the first offense, a covered employer will be subject to a&#13;<br \/>\nwritten warning if the employer provides, within 30 days of the&#13;<br \/>\nservice of summons, documentation indicating that such violation&#13;<br \/>\nhas been cured. If the employer fails to provide such&#13;<br \/>\ndocumentation, they will be subject to a civil penalty of $1,000;&#13;<br \/>\nand<\/li>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<\/p>\n<li>For any subsequent offense, a covered employer will be subject&#13;<br \/>\nto a civil penalty of $5,000.<\/li>\n<p>&#13;\n<\/ul>\n<p>The designated agency will also publish annually on its website&#13;<br \/>\na list of covered employers that fail to comply with the reporting&#13;<br \/>\nrequirements.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Other Pay Data Reporting Laws and Pending&#13;<br \/>\nBills<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>With the enactment of this new requirement, NYC will join a&#13;<br \/>\nsmall\u2014but potentially expanding\u2014group of jurisdictions&#13;<br \/>\nrequiring employer pay data reporting.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaq.com\/redirection.asp?article_id=1730306&amp;company_id=7032&amp;redirectaddress=https:\/\/calemploymentlawupdate.proskauer.com\/2025\/03\/its-that-time-of-year-again-california-pay-data-reporting-is-due-may-14-2025\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">California<\/a> has required private employers with&#13;<br \/>\n100+ employees in total (and at least one employee in CA) to submit&#13;<br \/>\nannual workforce pay and demographic data reporting to he&#13;<br \/>\nCalifornia Civil Rights Department since March 2021 (with certain&#13;<br \/>\nmodifications over time). Reports are organized by establishment&#13;<br \/>\nand include breakdowns by job category, pay band, race, ethnicity,&#13;<br \/>\nand sex, along with hours worked. Employers face per-employee civil&#13;<br \/>\npenalties for non-compliance.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaq.com\/redirection.asp?article_id=1730306&amp;company_id=7032&amp;redirectaddress=https:\/\/www.lawandtheworkplace.com\/2022\/02\/first-deadline-approaching-for-new-illinois-equal-pay-act-requirements\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Illinois<\/a> began requiring private businesses&#13;<br \/>\nwith more than 100 employees in Illinois to obtain an Equal Pay&#13;<br \/>\nRegistration Certification, with the first certificate having been&#13;<br \/>\nrequired by March 23, 2024 and continuing every two years&#13;<br \/>\nthereafter. To obtain a certificate, employers must submit certain&#13;<br \/>\ninformation to the Illinois Department of Labor, including (i) the&#13;<br \/>\nemployer&#8217;s most recently filed EEO-1 report; (ii) a list of&#13;<br \/>\nemployees separated by gender, race, and ethnicity with&#13;<br \/>\nemployee-level data including county, dates of employment, and&#13;<br \/>\ntotal wages; and (iii) a signed compliance statement meeting&#13;<br \/>\ncertain specifications.<\/p>\n<p>And in a related requirement, effective as of February 2025, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaq.com\/redirection.asp?article_id=1730306&amp;company_id=7032&amp;redirectaddress=https:\/\/www.lawandtheworkplace.com\/2025\/02\/new-massachusetts-employer-eeo-reporting-begins-monday-february-3-2025\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Massachusetts<\/a> employers with 100+ employees in&#13;<br \/>\nMA are required to annually submit to the MA state secretary copies&#13;<br \/>\nof their EEO-1 report as submitted to the EEOC. Employers covered&#13;<br \/>\nby the EEOC&#8217;s EEO-3 (covering local referral unions), EEO-4&#13;<br \/>\n(covering state and local governments), and\/or EEO-5 (covering&#13;<br \/>\npublic elementary and secondary school systems) reporting&#13;<br \/>\nrequirements are also required to submit to the MA state secretary&#13;<br \/>\ncopies of such reports on a biannual basis.<\/p>\n<p>Looking ahead, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nysenate.gov\/legislation\/bills\/2025\/S6235\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">New York state<\/a> legislature is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nysenate.gov\/legislation\/bills\/2025\/S6235\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">currently considering a bill<\/a> that would require&#13;<br \/>\nemployers bidding on state contracts to annually submit employee&#13;<br \/>\npay data broken down by job category, gender, race, and ethnicity,&#13;<br \/>\nas well as the difference between pay averages in each category, to&#13;<br \/>\nthe New York State Comptroller.<\/p>\n<p class=\"lxb_af-template_tags-get_post_title\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaq.com\/redirection.asp?article_id=1730306&amp;company_id=7032&amp;redirectaddress=https:\/\/www.lawandtheworkplace.com\/2026\/01\/nyc-to-join-other-jurisdictions-in-requiring-employer-pay-data-reporting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NYC to Join Other Jurisdictions in Requiring&#13;<br \/>\nEmployer Pay Data Reporting<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The content of this article is intended to provide a general&#13;<br \/>\nguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought&#13;<br \/>\nabout your specific circumstances.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: &#13; within Environment topic(s) &#13; After the NYC Council voted to override&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":487336,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[5229,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-513400","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-new-york","10":"tag-new-york-city","11":"tag-newyork","12":"tag-newyorkcity","13":"tag-ny","14":"tag-nyc","15":"tag-united-states","16":"tag-united-states-of-america","17":"tag-unitedstates","18":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","19":"tag-us","20":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115888600468731341","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=513400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513400\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/487336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=513400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=513400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=513400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}