{"id":525425,"date":"2026-01-18T15:39:10","date_gmt":"2026-01-18T15:39:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/525425\/"},"modified":"2026-01-18T15:39:10","modified_gmt":"2026-01-18T15:39:10","slug":"the-hidden-danger-in-new-yorks-universal-child-care-plan-and-how-it-can-be-fixed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/525425\/","title":{"rendered":"The hidden danger in New York’s universal child care plan\u2014 and how it can be fixed"},"content":{"rendered":"

New York\u2019s child-care debate<\/a> is being sold as a budget question.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not: It\u2019s a child-outcomes question.<\/p>\n

Credit to Mayor Zohran Mamdani for putting this issue front and center. My party \u2014 the family-values party \u2014 has been slow at advancing solutions.<\/p>\n

Child care sits at the intersection of affordability and workforce growth. But the question now is whether Albany will help families, or build another government system that replaces them.<\/p>\n

First off, let\u2019s stop calling it \u201cuniversal.\u201d Gov. Kathy Hochul and the media are selling it as a statewide policy. But this is NYC day care with upstate crumbs, even though there are 8 million New Yorkers in the city and 11 million upstate.<\/p>\n

Pre-K isn\u2019t even universal yet.<\/p>\n

But geography isn\u2019t the biggest problem. The real issue is<\/a> what kind of system Albany is building: family care or state care.<\/p>\n

When government becomes the default caregiver for toddlers, kids\u2019 development is at stake.<\/p>\n

If the system is high-quality, safe and properly staffed, children can thrive.<\/p>\n

But if Albany promises big, scales fast and improvises later, kids will suffer.<\/p>\n

Look no further than the state\u2019s botched legal-marijuana rollout: big talk, sloppy execution, disastrous results. The stakes here are infinitely higher.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s what\u2019s been left out: There\u2019s serious evidence that rushed \u201cuniversal\u201d child care can backfire.<\/p>\n

A long-run study of Quebec\u2019s universal rollout found negative impacts on children\u2019s behavioral outcomes when expansion outpaced safeguards.<\/p>\n

One author of that study was Jonathan Gruber, the MIT economist associated with Obamacare \u2014 not exactly a conservative academic.<\/p>\n

That should terrify anyone treating \u201cuniversal care\u201d like a panacea.<\/p>\n

Two-year-olds don\u2019t make good subjects for a pilot project. They\u2019re not a socialist testing ground. They\u2019re our kids.<\/p>\n

In 1965, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan warned that welfare could unintentionally weaken families \u2014 by penalizing marriage and discouraging the involvement of fathers. He proved right.<\/p>\n

And that warning applies here: If Albany builds a care system<\/a> that replaces families rather than strengthens them, it will create problems it can\u2019t spend its way out of.<\/p>\n

Before creating a massive new entitlement, lawmakers should ask: Are we building a program that supports families \u2014 or a system that quietly displaces them?<\/p>\n

The practical problems suggest the latter. Start with staffing.<\/p>\n

Per state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli, New York has about 2,000 fewer child-care providers now than in 2015.<\/p>\n

And Albany wants universal access for the youngest children, who require the most staffing.<\/p>\n

The city\u2019s \u201c2-Care\u201d program alone needs roughly 11,000 new workers \u2014 and no one\u2019s saying where they\u2019ll come from.<\/p>\n

In September, New Mexico admitted it needs 5,000 additional professionals for its universal child-care program. New York won\u2019t publish its estimate.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGet opinions and commentary from our columnists\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSubscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter!\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\tThanks for signing up!\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Then there are facilities. Two-year-olds require licensed space, bathrooms, safety upgrades \u2014 real infrastructure.<\/p>\n

The tab could run into the billions, with carrying costs of $150 million to $300 million per year, even before hiring workers.<\/p>\n

The plan also has no dedicated long-term revenue stream and doesn\u2019t require means testing, which means an East Side billionaire gets the same benefit as Flatbush single mother.\u00a0That\u2019s political malpractice.<\/p>\n

Announce the program now, fight about funding later. When \u201clater\u201d arrives, raise taxes, raid budgets or quietly ration with waitlists while pretending it\u2019s \u201cuniversal.\u201d<\/p>\n

Nor does child care exist in a vacuum: New York has a caregiver crisis across elder care, disability care and home health care.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Albany is destabilizing the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program, which lets families care for their own elderly and disabled relatives.<\/p>\n

The state will bid against itself for workers, driving costs higher while weakening every service.<\/p>\n

Finally, let\u2019s be honest about the politics driving this: A \u201cuniversal\u201d system is a pipeline to tens of thousands of new dues-paying members for unions like 1199 SEIU, DC 37, and the United Federation of Teachers. Once built, it\u2019s nearly impossible to reform.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s the alternative?<\/p>\n

How about caregiver credits \u2014 money families can use for care that works best for them, whether it\u2019s for child care, helping a spouse stay home, supporting a grandparent or caring for a disabled relative.<\/p>\n

This wouldn\u2019t eliminate the need to expand child-care supply. But a family-first credit recognizes reality: More parents work from home part-time, and families can cobble together care if Albany gives them room to breathe.<\/p>\n

That strengthens families and expands options \u2014 unlike a massive state-run system where Albany controls everything.<\/p>\n

What New York needs isn\u2019t another one-size-fits-all \u201canswer.\u201d It\u2019s freedom of choice for families \u2014 and relief that meets families where they actually live.<\/p>\n

New Yorkers should want reform that\u2019s honest about keeping children safe and supported \u2014 not another Albany program that looks beautiful on paper but breaks down in real life.<\/p>\n

If you think NYC public schools and public housing are models of competent government, sure: Sign up for this, too.<\/p>\n

But if we get this wrong, it won\u2019t just waste money; it\u2019ll undermine families.<\/p>\n

And the price will be paid by the very children Albany hopes to help.<\/p>\n

David Catalfamo, president of Capital Public Strategies, was the political director of Gov. George Pataki\u2019s 1994 campaign.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"New York\u2019s child-care debate is being sold as a budget question. It\u2019s not: It\u2019s a child-outcomes question. Credit…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":525426,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[5229,25090,245,233436,13959,15669,233437,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,7045,1269,113237,39749,67,586,132,5230,68,2969,5301],"class_list":{"0":"post-525425","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-childcare","10":"tag-children","11":"tag-daniel-patrick-moynihan","12":"tag-families","13":"tag-government-spending","14":"tag-jonathan-gruber","15":"tag-new-york","16":"tag-new-york-city","17":"tag-newyork","18":"tag-newyorkcity","19":"tag-ny","20":"tag-nyc","21":"tag-obamacare","22":"tag-opinion","23":"tag-pre-kindergarten","24":"tag-unions","25":"tag-united-states","26":"tag-united-states-of-america","27":"tag-unitedstates","28":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","29":"tag-us","30":"tag-usa","31":"tag-zohran-mamdani"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115916857214914718","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/525425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=525425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/525425\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/525426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=525425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=525425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=525425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}