{"id":532256,"date":"2026-01-21T13:39:10","date_gmt":"2026-01-21T13:39:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/532256\/"},"modified":"2026-01-21T13:39:10","modified_gmt":"2026-01-21T13:39:10","slug":"an-effort-to-save-local-journalism-in-california-is-foundering","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/532256\/","title":{"rendered":"An effort to save local journalism in California is foundering"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

California has a problem. It\u2019s not homelessness<\/a>, a lack of housing or the state\u2019s increasing unaffordability<\/a>, all of which have been documented at length.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s truth decay.<\/p>\n

If you believe that information is the taproot of knowledge and expanding personal vistas is key to learning, there\u2019s a case to be made that the great Golden State \u2014 quietly, with scant notice \u2014 is growing more impoverished by the day.<\/p>\n

In the last quarter of a century, a third of California newsrooms have closed.<\/a><\/p>\n

Nearly 7 in 10 journalists have lost their jobs.<\/p>\n

The relentlessly cruel economics of the news business, driven in good part by the voracious profiteering of monoliths <\/a>such as Google and Facebook, has devastated the industry \u2014 including the newsroom that employs your friendly columnist \u2014 drastically shrinking its output and leaving California, like the rest of the country, vastly worse off.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s an information vacuum and that space is filling up with garbage.<\/p>\n

Increasingly, the daily diet of \u201cnews\u201d that the media serves up is being sourced from partisans, propagandists and self-interested promoters who falsely style themselves as prophets of the unvarnished truth.<\/p>\n

(If you genuinely can\u2019t differentiate between news and commentary<\/a>, such as this, or between those making an honest attempt to present a fair, all-things-considered account of events versus someone shaving, eliding and shoehorning facts to fit a predetermined narrative, here\u2019s a suggestion: Save time, skip the rest of this column and turn to the sports<\/a> or comics pages.)<\/p>\n

Not long ago, California took a baby step toward addressing this rampant decay.<\/p>\n

Now, even that tiny effort is tottering.<\/p>\n

In August 2024, the state and Google reached a deal <\/a>to invest $175 million over five years in local journalism. It was a compromise of sorts, and a lopsided one at that. Lawmakers were pushing a measure, similar to those enacted in Australia and Canada<\/a>, that would have forced tech giants to pay online publishers for the ransacking, er, use, of their journalistic content.<\/p>\n

They can well afford it.<\/p>\n

In just one year \u2014 2018 \u2014 Google made $4.7 billion from the work of news outlets, according to the News Media Alliance, a trade organization. The company\u2019s share of its agreement with California \u2014 $55 million \u2014 is barely a speck on its balance sheet; revenue for Alphabet, Google\u2019s parent company, topped $102 billion in its most recent quarterly earnings report.<\/p>\n

Google spent $11 million lobbying to kill the journalism-support legislation<\/a>, but eventually agreed to kick in at least something. Facebook took an oppositional stance \u2014 greed and amorality apparently being endemic<\/a> to its corporate culture \u2014 and threatened to remove news posts from its social media platforms if California forced the company to cough up for the news it used.<\/p>\n

Gov. Gavin Newsom hailed the deal with Google<\/a>, modest though it was, with characteristic grandiosity.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis agreement represents a major breakthrough in ensuring the survival of newsrooms and bolstering local journalism across California,\u201d he said. \u201cThe deal not only provides funding to support hundreds of new journalists but helps rebuild a robust and dynamic California press corps for years to come, reinforcing the vital role of journalism in our democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n

The reality, however, has turned out quite differently.<\/p>\n

In May 2025, Newsom slashed the state\u2019s first-year commitment<\/a> to the newsroom-subsidy program from $30 million to $10 million, citing budget constraints. (In the same budget year, California vastly expanded its film and TV tax credit,<\/a> showing where the governor\u2019s priorities lay.) Google then said it would match the state\u2019s $10-million investment and no more.<\/p>\n

But even that $20 million has yet to reach newsrooms. And going forward, the prospects for boosting California\u2019s stretched-thin newsrooms look exceedingly dim.<\/p>\n

In his most recent budget proposal, released this month, Newsom proposed precisely zero dollars<\/a> for the so-called Newsroom Transformation Fund. Which means Google is on the hook for precisely zero dollars \u2014 though any contribution at all is subject to the company\u2019s goodwill.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe deal was never etched in paper and signed by any party \u2014 it was a handshake agreement in principle,\u201d Erin Ivie, a spokesperson for Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, told CalMatters. (The Oakland Democrat was a key participant in negotiations with Google.)<\/p>\n

\u201cThere was never any penalty or consequence built into the agreement,\u201d Ivie said, \u201cas the arrangement is voluntary, not coercive.\u201d<\/p>\n

Steve Glazer, a former Democratic state senator from Orinda, authored legislation that would have imposed an \u201cextraction\u201d fee<\/a> on the major tech platforms, raising about $500 million a year that California news outlets could have used to hire local journalists. It passed the Senate in June 2024 on a two-thirds vote but was torpedoed as part of the compromise that resulted in the deal with Google.<\/p>\n

Glazer, who left the Legislature in December 2024, has continued his fight to sustain local journalism, serving as a senior advisor to the group Rebuild Local News, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that seeks to do what its name suggests.<\/p>\n

\u201cA functioning democracy has independent news as [a foundation] for oversight and accountability,\u201d Glazer said, noting the erasure of two-thirds of professional journalists in California in the last 25 years. \u201cThe ability of the public to get information, discern the facts and have reasoned opinions about who\u2019s in charge and doing what is in serious jeopardy without a robust local news community.\u201d<\/p>\n

Forcing social media platforms to pay for the news and information they pilfer and monetize seems a quite modest and reasonable step. Not just to provide news publishers the equivalent of a fair and honest wage, but also to bolster our wobbling democracy<\/a> by fostering an engaged and knowledgeable electorate.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not too much to ask of lawmakers: Make California robustly informed again.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"California has a problem. It\u2019s not homelessness, a lack of housing or the state\u2019s increasing unaffordability, all of…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":532257,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5123],"tags":[38670,1582,276,638,3853,7837,235926,2722,12644,2961,235924,224,5337,50,18738,17872,290,235925,1628],"class_list":{"0":"post-532256","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-los-angeles","8":"tag-agreement","9":"tag-ca","10":"tag-california","11":"tag-company","12":"tag-deal","13":"tag-democracy","14":"tag-erin-ivie","15":"tag-google","16":"tag-information","17":"tag-la","18":"tag-local-journalism","19":"tag-los-angeles","20":"tag-losangeles","21":"tag-news","22":"tag-news-outlet","23":"tag-newsroom","24":"tag-state","25":"tag-steve-glazer","26":"tag-year"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115933371779822062","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532256","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=532256"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532256\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/532257"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=532256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=532256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=532256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}