{"id":550892,"date":"2026-01-29T05:57:17","date_gmt":"2026-01-29T05:57:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/550892\/"},"modified":"2026-01-29T05:57:17","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T05:57:17","slug":"san-diego-county-supervisors-vote-to-restrict-federal-access-to-county-facilities-without-warrant-nbc-7-san-diego","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/550892\/","title":{"rendered":"San Diego County Supervisors vote to restrict federal access to county facilities without warrant \u2013 NBC 7 San Diego"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The San Diego County Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance Wednesday that restricts federal law enforcement access to county facilities without a warrant.<\/p>\n<p>Supervisor Jim Desmond was the lone dissenter on the ordinance, which passed on a 3-1 vote, with Joel Anderson absent.<\/p>\n<p>As proposed by board Chair Terra Lawson-Remer, an updated version of the Civil Liberties Enforcement and Accountability Rules Ordinance would require:<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; judicial warrants for federal access to non-public areas of county properties;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; signs in multiple languages that allow visitors to understand their rights;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; county contractors, grantees and lessees to enforce civil-rights protections;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; an annual public report on U.S. Department of Homeland Security activity and any interaction or cooperation with the county sheriff; and<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; supporting residents to access county services &#8212; such as health care, marriage licenses and assistance &#8212; &#8220;without fear of intimidation or detainment.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The item was part of Wednesday&#8217;s consent agenda and will take effect in 30 days, according to Lawson-Remer&#8217;s office.<\/p>\n<p>The ordinance &#8220;supports efforts to ensure that county resources are not used for immigration raids or to target individuals based on protected characteristics,&#8221; Lawson-Remer&#8217;s office stated.<\/p>\n<p>Lawson-Remer on Wednesday thanked San Diego City Councilman Sean Elo- Rivera, who proposed the idea of the city and county working together in bringing an ordinance.<\/p>\n<p>She added that the ordinance will be enforced in part via agreements with the county&#8217;s contractors.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think we all want law enforcement to keep our communities safe, but when families are afraid to go into a clinic or report a crime or walk into a county office, that makes everyone less safe,&#8221; she added.<\/p>\n<p>Desmond described the ordinance as &#8220;divisive and restrictive, and not collaborative.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, it took two tragic shootings in Minnesota for both sides to come together to the table to talk and to compromise,&#8221; Desmond said, referring to the January shooting deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, both 37.<\/p>\n<p>Desmond added that public safety is best protected &#8220;when all levels of government communicate clearly and coordinate effectively before crises happen, not after.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Supervisor Paloma Aguirre also mentioned Good and Pretti during her comments in support of the CLEAR Ordinance.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is unacceptable &#8212; no government agency should operate in a way that leaves communities traumatized and questioning whether basic safeguards still exist,&#8221; she said.<\/p>\n<p>During a public hearing, most spoke in favor of the new policy, including a member of the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans who shared her own citizenship journey.<\/p>\n<p>Patricia Serrano said she was undocumented for 25 years in the United States, &#8220;because the system is broken,&#8221; and didn&#8217;t have an opportunity to become legalized.<\/p>\n<p>Serrano said she is now a proud American citizen, but &#8220;I&#8217;m still afraid to go out and be profiled (due to) my color, by my accent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>People &#8220;have the perception that we are criminals &#8212; we are human beings,&#8221; she said. &#8220;It&#8217;s not easy to leave your country or your family behind.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On Jan. 13, the supervisors voted 3-1 to advance the policy as part of a first reading. Anderson was the lone no vote, with Desmond absent that day.<\/p>\n<p>In statement afterward, Anderson said he voted against the proposal &#8220;because spending a million dollars to tell federal employees to follow the Constitution at the expense of constituents in my district that need social services was not acceptable to me.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>An official from Anderson&#8217;s office said the figure was based on an estimate from county staff.<\/p>\n<p>According to information on Wednesday&#8217;s agenda, money for the proposal is part of the fiscal year 2025-26 budget, based on existing staff time in the Purchasing and Contracting Department and Communications Office, along with service charges to client departments and general purpose revenue.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There will be no change in net general fund cost and no additional staff years,&#8221; according to the county.<\/p>\n<p>Last October, supervisors directed Chief Administrative Officer Ebony Shelton write a draft of the ordinance based upon a policy the San Diego City Council adopted on Oct. 20. County staff presented a drafted ordinance on Nov. 18, and supervisors on Dec. 9 directed Shelton to include amendments to the proposed law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The San Diego County Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance Wednesday that restricts federal law enforcement access to&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":165473,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5134],"tags":[5229,1582,276,5410,409,3549,12051,7264,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-550892","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-san-diego","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-ca","10":"tag-california","11":"tag-ice","12":"tag-immigration","13":"tag-san-diego","14":"tag-san-diego-county-board-of-supervisors","15":"tag-sandiego","16":"tag-united-states","17":"tag-united-states-of-america","18":"tag-unitedstates","19":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","20":"tag-us","21":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/115976853480313205","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/550892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=550892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/550892\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/165473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=550892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=550892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=550892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}