{"id":58007,"date":"2025-07-11T22:40:13","date_gmt":"2025-07-11T22:40:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/58007\/"},"modified":"2025-07-11T22:40:13","modified_gmt":"2025-07-11T22:40:13","slug":"crystal-palace-removal-from-europa-league-a-terrible-injustice-club-chairman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/58007\/","title":{"rendered":"Crystal Palace removal from Europa League a \u2018terrible injustice\u2019 \u2013 club chairman"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Crystal Palace being denied entry to this coming season\u2019s Europa League is a \u201cterrible injustice\u201d and a \u201cbad day for football\u201d, the club\u2019s chairman Steve Parish has said.<\/p>\n<p>A UEFA panel has recommended that Palace are denied entry to the competition after it found that the club breached the governing body\u2019s rules on multi-club ownership.<\/p>\n<p>The south London club are now set to compete in the third-tier Conference League but intend to lodge an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League and originally qualified for the Conference League, could now replace them in the Europa League.<\/p>\n<p>UEFA\u2019s rules say that the next-best-placed club in the top domestic league of the same association will replace any team who drop out of its continental competitions, providing the replacement club \u2018fulfils the admission criteria\u2019 of the tournament and possesses the relevant license, but any confirmation of such is unlikely before the outcome of any potential CAS hearing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re devastated,\u201d Parish told Sky Sports.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a bad day for football. It\u2019s a terrible injustice. I do believe nobody want to see this. I don\u2019t think Uefa wants to see this. We\u2019ve been locked out of a European competition on the most ridiculous technicality. Supporters of all clubs should be devastated for us.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Palace had originally qualified for the Europa League by winning the FA Cup in May. Eberechi Eze scored the only goal of the game against Manchester City as the club lifted its first ever major trophy.<\/p>\n<p>UEFA\u2019s rules state that no individual or legal entity can have \u201ccontrol or influence\u201d over more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition, and European football\u2019s governing body must be satisfied that the respective clubs are separate entities to maintain their tournaments\u2019 integrity.<\/p>\n<p>Palace\u2019s issue stems from Eagle Football, which owns a 43 per cent share of the club and is controlled by John Textor, also owning a majority stake in French club Lyon, who qualified for the competition.<\/p>\n<p>The club\u2019s four general partners \u2014 Textor, chairman Parish, Josh Harris and David Blitzer \u2014 presented their case to the panel on June 3 but had their arguments rejected by UEFA, despite Textor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6444914\/2025\/06\/23\/crystal-palace-woody-johnson-john-textor-sale\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">agreeing on June 23 to sell Eagle\u2019s stake in Palace to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson<\/a>. The sale will have to be ratified by the Premier League, with Johnson being the subject of the league\u2019s owners\u2019 and directors\u2019 test, a process which typically takes around two months.<\/p>\n<p>UEFA had postponed a verdict on Palace until the outcome of Lyon\u2019s appeal against relegation to Ligue 2, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6449082\/2025\/07\/09\/lyon-relegation-decision-ligue-1\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">which they won<\/a>. Lyon had initially been demoted to the second-tier following a review of their financial situation by the Direction Nationale du Controle de Gestion, the body responsible for overseeing the finances of French football clubs, and agreed with UEFA that they would not play in Europe if their relegation was upheld.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-6441143 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2214986807-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1703\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>      Palace won the FA Cup, a first major trophy in their history, back in May (Adrian Dennis\/AFP via Getty Images)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEveryone knows we\u2019re not part of a multi-club set-up,\u201d Parish said on Friday. \u201cWe don\u2019t share any staff. We\u2019re caught up in a rule that wasn\u2019t put there for us. I don\u2019t understand why the panel has come to the conclusion they have done. I think we\u2019ve shown John had no influence over our club.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is a ludicrous decision. We will ask the appeal court to listen to our argument.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/5618262\/2024\/07\/05\/man-utd-city-girona-nice-uefa-multi-club-rules\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">In July 2024<\/a>, UEFA cleared multi-club pairs Manchester City and Girona (Champions League), and Manchester United and Nice (Europa League), to compete in the same tournaments due to off-field restructuring.<\/p>\n<p>European football\u2019s governing body said that \u201cfollowing the implementation of significant changes by the concerned investors\u201d in both Nice and Girona, no one has \u201ccontrol or decisive influence\u201d over both teams.<\/p>\n<p>A statement from the First Chamber of UEFA\u2019s Club Financial Control Body(CFCB) on Friday read: \u201cThe CFCB First Chamber had opened proceedings against Crystal Palace and Olympique Lyonnais due to a potential conflict with the multi-club ownership rule provided for in Article 5 of the UEFA Club Competitions Regulations.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOn 9 July 2025, the appeal instance of the French financial control authority (DNCG) decided not to relegate Olympique Lyonnais to Ligue 2. Consequently, and following an assessment by the CFCB of all the other relevant conditions included in the settlement agreement, Olympique Lyonnais will not be excluded from the 2025\/26 UEFA club competitions (see media release of 30 June 2025).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cConsequently, the CFCB First Chamber pursued the assessment of the documentation submitted by Olympique Lyonnais and Crystal Palace and concluded that the clubs breached, as at 1 March 2025, the multi-club ownership criteria foreseen in Art 5.01 of the UEFA Club Competition Regulations.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor this reason, and in accordance with the provisions set in Art. 5.02, 5.03 and 5.04 of the UEFA Club Competitions Regulations, the CFCB First Chamber decided:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 To accept Olympique Lyonnais\u2019 admission to the 2025\/26 UEFA Europa League; and<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 To reject Crystal Palace\u2019s admission to the 2025\/26 UEFA Europa League and to accept Crystal Palace\u2019s admission to the 2025\/26 UEFA Conference League.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe present decision may be appealed against before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, in accordance with Articles 62 and 63 of the UEFA Statutes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2018A burning sense of injustice\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This feels eerily familiar. Palace were denied what they thought would be a UEFA Cup place after their most successful top-flight season saw them finish third in 1990-91 under Steve Coppell\u2019s management. English clubs had been banned from European competition following the Heysel disaster in 1985, with Liverpool handed an extended ban. However, Liverpool\u2019s ban was lifted a few weeks before the end of the campaign, meaning Palace missed out.<\/p>\n<p>This time around, in different circumstances, the \u2018punishment\u2019 is lighter, albeit no less infuriating given Palace will feel they have been denied the opportunity to participate in a competition for which they legitimately qualified. They will instead compete in the Europa Conference League, the lesser of the two tournaments.<\/p>\n<p>While that is some compensation, a burning sense of injustice will remain unless an appeal is successful if and when it\u2019s heard by CAS, in which case Palace will, as they feel is their right, be admitted to the Europa League after all.<\/p>\n<p>If Textor was still involved then this would have presented questions as to how sustainable the ownership situation was, but he will depart Palace when the sale of Eagle\u2019s share completes.<\/p>\n<p>But the reality is that Palace have never operated like a true multi-club group, due primarily to Parish\u2019s reluctance to embrace that model. While it may not have saved them a Europa League place here, it has prevented them from being caught up quite so much in the chaos that seems to be following Eagle in France.<\/p>\n<p>As it is, Palace\u2019s ownership situation looks to now be more settled and they will be increasingly wary of taking any future investment that puts them in a potentially awkward position.<\/p>\n<p>This decision feels unjust given how little involvement Textor had, but UEFA believe they have failed to prove that Textor did not hold decisive influence. Unless they can successfully overturn the decision then it may be a source of regret that they did not foresee this potential conflict either when the American arrived or when they hoped to push for a European spot.<\/p>\n<p>On the back of their most successful Premier League season, this outcome threatens to overshadow their outstanding achievement and the joy that came with it in the most unjust manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">(Adrian Dennis\/AFP via Getty Images)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Crystal Palace being denied entry to this coming season\u2019s Europa League is a \u201cterrible injustice\u201d and a \u201cbad&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":58008,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[9438,42333,42334,16869,220,62,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-58007","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sports","8":"tag-crystal-palace","9":"tag-europa-league","10":"tag-fa-cup","11":"tag-nottingham-forest","12":"tag-premier-league","13":"tag-sports","14":"tag-united-states","15":"tag-unitedstates","16":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114837011074015011","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58007\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/58008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}