{"id":588393,"date":"2026-02-14T02:12:27","date_gmt":"2026-02-14T02:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/588393\/"},"modified":"2026-02-14T02:12:27","modified_gmt":"2026-02-14T02:12:27","slug":"hawai%ca%bbi-officials-worry-bills-to-help-property-owners-with-coastal-erosion-could-put-public-beaches-at-risk-maui-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/588393\/","title":{"rendered":"Hawai\u02bbi officials worry bills to help property owners with coastal erosion could put public beaches at risk : Maui Now"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Every day, Kahana resident Spencer Schmerling is reminded that the shoreline fronting his condominium is shrinking.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cSafety risks are increasing, and recent sand loss and seawall damage shows just how serious this has become,\u201d Schmerling told state lawmakers via Zoom during a public hearing in Honolulu on Thursday. \u201cThis is not a single property issue. It\u2019s a regional crisis.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"Sandbags line the shoreline of Kahana Bay in this photo provided in the 2021 draft study on the impacts of erosion control measures for the area. <\/p>\n

State lawmakers are considering a pair of bills that would help property owners affected by coastal erosion, but they face opposition from state agencies concerned the measures would put natural resources and public beaches at risk.<\/p>\n

HJI Weekly Newsletter<\/p>\n

Get more stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for the Hawai\u2018i Journalism Initiative’s weekly newsletter:<\/p>\n

ADDING YOU TO THE LIST…<\/p>\n

House Bill 1846<\/a> would create regional shoreline mitigation districts where properties would be required to create their own coastal erosion and sediment management plans. That would then make it easier to review county and state permits for shoreline work.<\/p>\n

House Bill 2205<\/a> would replace the current ban on private shoreline hardening measures with a policy of allowing \u201climited, carefully conditioned shoreline protection measures where necessary.\u201d It also would allow emergency permits to be issued for erosion mitigation, and be valid for up to five years.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The House Water and Land Committee deferred both bills<\/a> on Thursday. HB 1846 has also been referred to the Finance Committee, while HB 2205 has been referred to the Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs Committee. Both measures have companion bills in the Senate.<\/p>\n

Residents in places like Kahana say the bills would give them more solutions and allow them to act more quickly in the face of worsening coastal erosion. But state officials worry they would shift the focus more toward protecting private property over natural resources and put public beaches at risk.<\/p>\n

The issue has grown more pressing for government officials and community members in recent years as high tides and big waves on eroded coastlines pose a greater threat to homes<\/a>, roads<\/a> and public facilities<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Seawalls have long been one method of hardening the shoreline against erosion. But in 2020, the State of Hawai\u2018i recognized seawalls\u2019 negative impacts to beaches<\/a> and banned private shoreline hardening structures.<\/p>\n

Michael Cain, administrator of the state Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands, explained that shoreline hardening \u201cis defined as artificially fixing the shoreline in one place.\u201d Shorelines are naturally dynamic, and erosion is a natural process that is always happening across the islands, Cain told the Water and Land Committee.<\/p>\n

Occasionally, shoreline hardening does have its uses, Cain said. For example, there is a clay bank eroding on Maui that the state may need to consider hardening to protect its resources. But hardening sandy beaches could mean losing them in the long run, and the islands have already lost too many beaches, he said. <\/p>\n

Cain said state lawmakers\u2019 proposal would effectively overturn the measure passed in 2020, which was \u201ca landmark piece of legislation that really put Hawai\u2018i in the lead of protecting coastal resources in the nation. I\u2019d hate to see that weakened.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"Michael Cain (right) says the state worries that the proposed bills will put more focus on protecting private property over public resources. Photo: Department of Land and Natural Resources<\/p>\n

But state lawmakers say barring private shoreline hardening \u201cmay limit the ability of state and county authorities to authorize narrowly tailored erosion control measures in emergency circumstances,\u201d according to House Bill 2205.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Shifting state policy from total prohibition of private shoreline-hardening structures to minimized, limited use \u201cwill allow the use of carefully reviewed and appropriately conditioned emergency measures where necessary, while preserving the State\u2019s strong policy preference against unnecessary or excessive shoreline armoring,\u201d the bill said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

In Kahana, the properties fronting the shoreline have faced \u201cdire erosion issues since 2007,\u201d said Mihoko Ito, who spoke on behalf of the Kahana Bay Steering Committee during the hearing on Thursday.\u00a0<\/p>\n

In 2017, nine condo properties and one residential parcel <\/strong>created the committee in hopes of finding a solution. They hired engineers to help put together an erosion mitigation project and published their draft plans in 2021<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But the process has stalled \u201cin part because the County of Maui indicated that it was unwilling to assume the liability risks of owning the proposed groins that would be required to keep the restored sand in place,\u201d Ito said in written testimony to the committee.\u00a0Groins are structures built perpendicular to the shoreline<\/a> to help intercept water flow and sediment and curb beach erosion. <\/p>\n

\u201cKahana Bay is at an inflection point,\u201d Ito said.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Both proposed measures would help Kahana residents, Ito said. House Bill 1846 would create long-term solutions by consolidating planning and reducing duplication, while House Bill 2205 would allow for short-term solutions.<\/p>\n

Allowing minimal shoreline hardening for private properties as needed would simply \u201cequalize the standards between state and private with respect to emergency shoreline solutions,\u201d Ito said.<\/p>\n

She said that the condos in Kahana have resorted to temporary sandbags to keep the erosion at bay, but those are in disrepair and have grown dangerous to both the public and condo residents.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"The shoreline fronting the Hololani and Royal Kahana properties is seen in this photo from the 2021 draft study on the impacts of erosion control measures in the area. <\/p>\n

Joshua Greig, whose family has lived on O\u2018ahu\u2019s North Shore for 30 years, said they\u2019ve lost nearly 40 feet of their sand dune over 10 years of erosion, and now their house sits just feet from the ocean. He said there is often \u201cadversarial framing of private homeowners versus public beach,\u201d but everyone wants the same thing.<\/p>\n

On the North Shore, Greig said, \u201cprotection of the public beach has been almost entirely put on the back of private homeowners,\u201d who can\u2019t afford the millions of dollars it would take to put in erosion control measures. Even if they got the funding and the permits, he said, the family\u2019s home \u201ccould be wiped out long before.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe state does have a worthy endeavor of protecting the state property and public access,\u201d Greig said. \u201cBut there is, I would say, an equal importance on the state protecting private property. That\u2019s one of the most important rights that we have.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cain said the Department of Land and Natural Resources, which oversees the office he runs, opposes both bills, in part because they would impact the department\u2019s focus on protecting public trust resources.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis reverses that dynamic and makes a priority in protecting private land interests, which are important, but our mission is to watch out for our natural and historic resources,\u201d Cain said of House Bill 1846.<\/p>\n

He added that creating regional shoreline mitigation districts and putting the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development in charge of the new process would also switch the roles of the two agencies, \u201cturning DLNR into an agency that reviews permits but lacks regulatory authority and turns the Office of Planning into a regulatory agency, despite not having the rules that allow them to regulate land issues.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Department of Land and Natural Resources already has the authority to issue emergency permits, he said, pointing to a recent example of a damaged seawall and sidewalk at Queen\u2019s Surf on O\u2018ahu<\/a> that the department issued permits for in two days.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a powerful tool, so I don\u2019t want to exploit it,\u201d Cain said. \u201cI\u2019m worried about embedding these emergency permits into law as a five-year permit. I don\u2019t think we need that.\u201d<\/p>\n

Officials with the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development also had concerns.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Director Mary Alice Evans said in written testimony that while the office \u201cconcurs that regional shoreline management is an appropriate approach to address coastal hazards,\u201d it was also worried about becoming a regulatory agency for decisions that normally would be left to other departments.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The bill also \u201csets a high priority on the protection of private shoreline properties and lists dune enhancement, beach nourishment, living shoreline projects, or structural measures such as rock groins as long-term erosion mitigation solutions to a regional shoreline mitigation district.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Evans said given the natural shoreline processes, the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development recommends also exploring \u201cremoval, retreat or relocation of the existing shoreline structures and infrastructure to protect dunes and beaches, and other public resources\u201d in the long term.<\/p>\n

O\u2018ahu Democratic Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto, whose district includes areas of downtown Honolulu, said ideally, shoreline property owners would move back their structures to preserve public access to coastal waters. <\/p>\n

\u201cIf we keep building seawalls where then the public can\u2019t access the ocean \u2026 when do we stop?\u201d Iwamoto said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

O\u2018ahu Republican Rep. Garner Shimizu, whose district includes Fort Shafter, Moanalua and other nearby areas, acknowledged concerns about shoreline hardening but wondered what choice the state had.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf we don\u2019t do anything, we\u2019re going to lose everything, and it\u2019s going to be gone,\u201d Shimizu said. \u201cSo there needs to be something that\u2019s done.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Every day, Kahana resident Spencer Schmerling is reminded that the shoreline fronting his condominium is shrinking.\u00a0 \u201cSafety risks…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":588394,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[23],"tags":[145714,114680,103559,746,254581,254582,254583,254584,4351,254585,254586,254587,254588,36821,254589,125439,254590,176784,202672,254591,159,254592,228091,254593,67,132,68,254594,121465],"class_list":["post-588393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-coastal-erosion","tag-department-of-land-and-natural-resources","tag-dlnr","tag-environment","tag-garner-shimizu","tag-hawaii-state-legislature","tag-house-bill-1846","tag-house-bill-2205","tag-house-of-representatives","tag-kahana-bay","tag-kahana-bay-steering-committee","tag-kahana-condos","tag-kim-coco-iwamoto","tag-maui","tag-michael-cain","tag-npcrosspost","tag-occl","tag-office-of-conservation-and-coastal-lands","tag-office-of-planning-and-sustainable-development","tag-opsd","tag-science","tag-seawalls","tag-shoreline-erosion","tag-shoreline-hardening","tag-united-states","tag-unitedstates","tag-us","tag-water-and-land-committee","tag-west-maui"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":"Validation failed: Text character limit of 500 exceeded"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/588393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=588393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/588393\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/588394"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=588393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=588393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=588393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}