{"id":596613,"date":"2026-02-17T15:36:10","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T15:36:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/596613\/"},"modified":"2026-02-17T15:36:10","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T15:36:10","slug":"initial-2026-ohio-state-depth-chart-projection-offense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/596613\/","title":{"rendered":"Initial 2026 Ohio State Depth Chart Projection: Offense"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n                   Although Ohio State\u2019s offense returns eight starters from last season, there are still plenty of depth chart questions entering spring practice.                <\/p>\n<p>\n\tWe know that Julian Sayin will be Ohio State\u2019s starting quarterback, Bo Jackson will be Ohio State\u2019s starting running back and Jeremiah Smith\u2019s leading receiver. On the other hand, there will be a battle for at least one starting wide receiver spot, there are four candidates to play major roles at tight end and there could be reshuffling on the offensive line even with four returning starters in the trenches.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIn our initial depth chart projection for the 2026 season, I\u2019ve put together a look at how I predict Ohio State\u2019s depth chart could stack up at all 11 positions on offense. (On Wednesday, we\u2019ll look at how Ohio State\u2019s depth chart could stack up at all 11 positions on defense.)\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe depth chart projection includes a three-deep for every position except running back and tight end, where I\u2019ve included four players to reflect the possibility that four players could see meaningful playing time at those positions. Each player is listed in only one spot on the depth chart, even if they have the potential to line up at multiple spots, such as along the offensive line. The projection reflects how I believe the depth chart will look when the season begins in September, not how the depth chart will look when spring practices begin in March.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tQuarterback<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Julian Sayin<br \/>2. Tavien St. Clair<br \/>3. Justyn Martin<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tSayin returns for his second year as Ohio State\u2019s starting quarterback after completing a school-record 77% of his passing attempts in 2025. St. Clair, who was Ohio State\u2019s third-string quarterback last season behind Lincoln Kienholz (who\u2019s now at Louisville), is expected to be the Buckeyes\u2019 top backup in 2026 as Ohio State grooms him to potentially succeed Sayin in 2027.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tMartin, the most experienced quarterback on the roster outside of Sayin, is likely in line to be Ohio State\u2019s third-string quarterback after transferring in from Maryland. He\u2019ll face competition for that spot from true freshman Luke Fahey.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tRunning Back<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Bo Jackson<br \/>2. Isaiah West<br \/>3. Ja\u2019Kobi Jackson<br \/>4. Legend Bey<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tBo Jackson returns for his second year as Ohio State\u2019s starting running back after running for 1,090 yards as a freshman. West is the frontrunner to be the Buckeyes\u2019 No. 2 RB after also impressing as a freshman, running for 310 yards and two touchdowns on just 59 carries and becoming the first running back off the bench for a portion of the season.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tJa\u2019Kobi Jackson, the only upperclassman on Ohio State\u2019s roster of scholarship running backs, also figures to be in the three-deep. The seventh-year senior from Florida ran for 509 yards and seven touchdowns in 2024 before an injury-plagued 2025 season, and none of Ohio State\u2019s other running backs have seen collegiate action.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThat said, true freshman Legend Bey and redshirt freshman Anthony \u201cTurbo\u201d Rogers could also push for roles in the offense, as both of them have the potential to be dynamic weapons out of the backfield as explosive athletes with pass-catching skills. Based on the way <a href=\"https:\/\/www.elevenwarriors.com\/ohio-state-football\/2026\/01\/161406\/legend-bey-reminds-ryan-day-of-tyreek-hill-hes-lightning-in-a-bottle\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Ryan Day talked about Bey last month<\/a>, when Day described the freshman as \u201cdynamite\u201d and \u201clightning in a bottle,\u201d I\u2019m predicting that Bey will see some offensive action in year one, likely starting in a limited capacity but with the potential to push his way up the depth chart if he impresses early.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tWide Receiver (X)<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Jeremiah Smith<br \/>2. Jerquaden Guilford<br \/>3. David Adolph<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\tWide Receiver (Z)<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Chris Henry Jr.<br \/>2. Devin McCuin<br \/>3. Phillip Bell<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\tWide Receiver (Slot)<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Brandon Inniss<br \/>2. Kyle Parker<br \/>3. De\u2019zie Jones<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWith Smith and Inniss returning as starters, Ohio State brought in two transfer candidates to potentially be its starting Z receiver in McCuin and Parker. But Henry is a tremendously gifted five-star prospect who has the skill set to push for an immediate starting job, so I\u2019m predicting he will quickly establish himself as one of Ohio State\u2019s top three receivers and earn his way into the lineup opposite Smith.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tParker and McCuin will likely see at least some action in the rotation regardless, and it\u2019s not out of the question that either of them could challenge Inniss for his starting job in the slot, considering both of them had more production at their previous schools than Inniss did at Ohio State last season. But Inniss is projected to remain a starter given his standing as an incumbent starter and a team captain.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tGuilford also has the talent to carve out an early role as a freshman and is the likeliest candidate to round out the two-deep at receiver. He projects to play Z receiver long-term, with Henry in line to be Ohio State\u2019s X receiver after Smith goes to the NFL, but he\u2019s listed at X on this depth chart projection because Henry is projected to start opposite Smith and either McCuin or Parker will likely rotate in that spot.\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"related-box\">\n\t<strong>RELATED<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.elevenwarriors.com\/ohio-state-football\/2026\/02\/161454\/eight-ohio-state-freshmen-who-could-contend-for-immediate-playing-time-in-2026\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Eight Ohio State Freshmen Who Could Contend For Immediate Playing Time in 2026<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAdolph was on the two-deep last year, so the former walk-on could also see some playing time in the receiver rotation, largely thanks to his perimeter blocking ability. Bell and Jones could also contend for spots on the two-deep after redshirting last season.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tTight End<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Nate Roberts<br \/>2. Mason Williams<br \/>3. Hunter Welcing<br \/>4. Bennett Christian<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tFour players are listed at tight end because it would be a surprise if any of Ohio State\u2019s top four tight ends don\u2019t see at least some playing time in 2026. Christian and Roberts were both part of what was a five-deep tight end rotation for Ohio State last season, while Williams and Welcing were both starters for their previous schools before transferring to Ohio State this offseason.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThere\u2019s no clear-cut pecking order in the group entering spring, but Roberts has the highest upside of the group. Ryan Day said last month that Roberts is \u201cas talented a young tight end that we\u2019ve had in awhile,\u201d leading me to believe Roberts\u00a0could be on the fast track to a starting job if he develops as Ohio State expects this offseason.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t<img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Nate Roberts\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/54834701415_ab3a93c91e_o.jpg\" title=\"Nate Roberts\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\n\t\tNate Roberts could emerge as Ohio State\u2019s starting tight end as a sophomore after playing 160 snaps as a true freshman.\n\t<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWilliams projects to be the new Will Kacmarek for Ohio State\u2019s offense, bringing a similar skill set as a blocker to OSU from Ohio. Given the emphasis Ohio State places on blocking at tight end, that could push Williams ahead of Welcing on the depth chart, though Welcing is likely to be a bigger factor in the passing game and has the advantage of experience playing in the Big Ten from six years at Northwestern.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tChristian, who\u2019s viewed as the veteran leader in the tight ends room, is also likely to have a role in multi-tight end packages as a blocker, as\u00a0he has for the past two years. He\u2019ll have to show more as a receiver to climb higher on the depth chart after playing the third-most snaps among Ohio State tight ends for each of the past two seasons, but the Buckeyes will look for ways to get him involved.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLeft Tackle<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Austin Siereveld<br \/>2. Sam Greer<br \/>3. Deontae Armstrong<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLeft Guard<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Luke Montgomery<br \/>2. Jake Cook<br \/>3. Maxwell Riley<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\tCenter<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Carson Hinzman<br \/>2. Joshua Padilla<br \/>3. Tucker Smith<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\tRight Guard<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Phillip Daniels<br \/>2. Gabe VanSickle<br \/>3. Landry Brede<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\tRight Tackle<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>1. Ian Moore<br \/>2. Carter Lowe<br \/>3. Vasean Washington<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tEven though Ohio State has four returning starters on the offensive line, I debated my starting projection for the offensive line more than any other position group. With Moore, Padilla and VanSickle all candidates to compete for a starting job this season alongside the four returning starters, there are numerous possibilities for how the starting offensive line could shake out in 2026.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThat said, I believe Moore is on a trajectory to be one of Ohio State\u2019s top two tackles this season after impressing in limited action last year. It\u2019s not out of the question that Siereveld could move back to guard \u2013 the position he played before last season \u2013 with Moore slotting in at left tackle and Daniels reprising his role at right tackle. But given that Siereveld was Ohio State\u2019s best offensive lineman last season, I expect him to ultimately stay at left tackle while Moore pushes for the starting job at right tackle, where Daniels struggled in pass protection down the stretch of last season. Daniels could be the top candidate to start at right guard if he gets displaced at right tackle, though Padilla and VanSickle will also be in contention for that job.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tPadilla and VanSickle will be the first interior offensive linemen off the bench if they aren\u2019t starters while Cook is the top candidate to join them on the two-deep. If Daniels moves to right guard, he\u2019ll still likely be the next man up at tackle, with Moore moving to left tackle if anything happens to Siereveld.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tGreer has a college-ready frame and the look of a future starter at left tackle, so I\u2019m betting on him to earn his way onto the two-deep right away, while Lowe is also a strong candidate to earn a second-team tackle spot as a redshirt freshman. Washington could also be the backup right tackle after starting at that position at Dartmouth, but he\u2019ll have ground to make up when he arrives in the summer as he makes the transition from the FCS to the FBS.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOutside of Greer, Riley is the most likely candidate among Ohio State\u2019s true freshman offensive linemen to push for a spot on the two-deep in year one, but he just misses out on a second-string guard spot in this projection. Brede, Smith and Mason Wilhelm will also compete for spots on the interior three-deep, though all of them will likely take redshirts as freshmen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Although Ohio State\u2019s offense returns eight starters from last season, there are still plenty of depth chart questions&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":596614,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[1318,1317,1315,1316,62,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-596613","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-ncaa-football","8":"tag-football","9":"tag-ncaa","10":"tag-ncaa-football","11":"tag-ncaafootball","12":"tag-sports","13":"tag-united-states","14":"tag-unitedstates","15":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116086714236111096","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=596613"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596613\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/596614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=596613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=596613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=596613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}