A long-awaited set of reports on how to build a fire-resilient Pacific Palisades, commissioned by Los Angeles city officials for $5 million, found that much of the hilly enclave remains out of compliance with standards for evacuating during a disaster. <\/p>\n
The reports, by the city and the global infrastructure firm AECOM, also recommended that the city complete significant brush clearance work, bolster its water system and move electrical wires underground.<\/p>\n
All of the recommendations are frequent asks from Palisades residents. Many have already been discussed at length by independent experts. They will inform the city\u2019s \u201cLong-Term Recovery Plan\u201d for rebuilding infrastructure and improving wildfire resilience after the Palisades fire killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of homes in January 2025.<\/p>\n
The reports outlined nearly a billion dollars in infrastructure projects through 2033, including more than $650 million for electrical undergrounding and $150 million for water system repairs. <\/p>\n
\u201cFull recovery is a long-term, multi-year effort that requires sustained coordination \u2014 and it must continue to be community-led,\u201d Mayor Karen Bass wrote in a Tuesday newsletter to Palisades residents<\/a> that included links to the reports. \u201cThis past year has been unimaginable for the Palisades community, but I remain committed to supporting you through every step of the recovery.\u201d<\/p>\n She noted that the Long-Term Recovery Plan would be finalized \u201cin the months ahead.\u201d<\/p>\n A month after the fire, Bass selected<\/a> Illinois-based Hagerty Consulting to work on fire recovery under a yearlong contract for up to $10 million.<\/p>\n However, in June, Bass announced<\/a> that AECOM would develop a recovery plan for the city. Hagerty, which had struggled to explain its role at community meetings, ultimately focused on debris removal logistics and finished its work<\/a> in December, billing the city $3.5 million.<\/p>\n In December, the city authorized payments<\/a> of $5 million for AECOM\u2019s first set of reports \u2014 which were originally due in mid-November<\/a> \u2014 and an additional $3 million to the company for long-term recovery planning.<\/p>\n Palisades residents say they are frustrated<\/a> at the price tag and feel that the effort has been chaotic and lacked urgency. Some have questioned whether the reports would contain an honest assessment of the situation, given that AECOM is not working independently of the city. <\/p>\n The three AECOM reports consist of recommendations for improving the Palisades\u2019 fire resiliency, a plan for rebuilding public infrastructure destroyed in the fire and how to coordinate traffic and other logistics as the area becomes a construction zone.<\/p>\n The resiliency report found that \u201calmost all\u201d local streets within the Palisades are narrower than permitted by the city fire code \u2014 particularly in the Alphabet Streets, Rustic Canyon and Castellammare areas. A \u201cmajority\u201d of long dead-end streets did not fulfill the sections of the fire code ensuring that fire engines have enough space to turn around, the report said.<\/p>\n A lawsuit filed in December<\/a> alleged that the city has routinely failed to comply with similar state regulations when it approved new construction in the city\u2019s \u201cvery high fire hazard\u201d areas. <\/p>\n These codes \u201cdirectly impact the ability to fight fires and for civilians to safely evacuate,\u201d said Jaime Hall, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, who are a group of resident associations in the Santa Monica Mountains and a fire safety advocacy organization. \u201cThey\u2019re not just regulations on a piece of paper.\u201d<\/p>\n The resiliency report also found that residents experienced \u201cevacuation warning fatigue\u201d from routine false alarms, making them hesitant to evacuate.<\/p>\n Additionally, many intersections in the Palisades could serve as bottlenecks during evacuations, leading to significant delays, the resiliency report said, basing the conclusion on a traffic pattern analysis. A Times investigation<\/a> found that the city had not conducted a similar analysis to help comply with state law.<\/p>\n Requirements to clear vegetation around homes, including the state\u2019s upcoming Zone Zero regulations, are not enough to meaningfully reduce wildfire risk in the Palisades, with its steep topography and dense vegetation, the resiliency report found. The city should work with land managers \u2014 including the state and county \u2014 on measures such as cutting gaps in vegetation for firefighter access, maintaining defensible space around community infrastructure and restoring native vegetation, the report said.<\/p>\n The public infrastructure report listed $150 million for \u201cwet\u201d infrastructure repairs, which included replacing aging and leaky water main pipelines.<\/p>\n The resiliency report outlined further potential improvements to provide more water for firefighting, such as building larger pipelines and additional tanks to move and store more drinking water; improving connections between local water systems; and tapping stormwater, treated wastewater or even seawater from the Pacific.<\/p>\n During the Palisades fire, hillside tanks ran out of water. Many fire hydrants, particularly in higher-elevation areas, lost pressure and ran dry<\/a>. The resiliency report said that installing pressure monitoring systems could \u201censure water availability and prevent dry hydrants by streaming live data to fire crews,\u201d and that remote-controlled valves could also help maintain water pressure during a fire.<\/p>\n