{"id":60220,"date":"2025-07-12T18:27:12","date_gmt":"2025-07-12T18:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/60220\/"},"modified":"2025-07-12T18:27:12","modified_gmt":"2025-07-12T18:27:12","slug":"this-city-government-veteran-thinks-los-angeles-is-in-deep-trouble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/60220\/","title":{"rendered":"This city government veteran thinks Los Angeles is in deep trouble"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Good morning, and welcome to L.A. on the Record \u2014 our City Hall newsletter. It\u2019s Julia Wick<\/a>, giving you the latest on city and county government. <\/p>\n

Rick Cole has forgotten more about municipal government than most of us will ever know. <\/p>\n

The 72-year-old former mayor (Pasadena), city manager (Ventura, Azusa, Santa Monica<\/a>) and deputy mayor<\/a> (Los Angeles) returned for a third stint at Los Angeles City Hall in 2022, bringing a depth of experience to political neophyte and then-newly elected City Controller Kenneth Mejia\u2019s office as Mejia\u2019s chief deputy. <\/p>\n

After two and a half years in City Hall East, Cole announced last month<\/a> that he would be leaving his post to focus on the Pasadena City Council, which he joined again last year. <\/p>\n

Cole knew that holding down \u201ca more-than-full-time role in LA and a more-than-part-time role in Pasadena\u201d would be difficult to juggle, he wrote in a LinkedIn post, and ultimately decided he couldn\u2019t do both jobs justice. <\/p>\n

Newsletter <\/p>\n

You\u2019re reading the L.A. on the Record newsletter<\/p>\n

Sign up to make sense of the often unexplained world of L.A. politics.<\/p>\n

Enter email address <\/p>\n

Sign Me Up <\/p>\n

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times. <\/p>\n

In a goodbye presentation to the L.A. City Council<\/a>, he sounded the alarm, saying he has never been more worried about the city.<\/p>\n

We sat down with Cole to discuss that speech and his fears. Here\u2019s some of our conversation, very lightly edited and condensed for clarity. <\/p>\n

Tell me about the speech you gave at council. What motivated it?<\/b><\/p>\n

I\u2019ve never been more alarmed about the future of Los Angeles. I delineated the existential challenges facing the city, which have been decades in the making. Politics needs to be looking out at the future and not just reacting to the crises of the day. And Los Angeles needs bold, systemic reform to meet the moment.<\/p>\n

Why are you so alarmed about the future of Los Angeles?<\/b><\/p>\n

It\u2019s a converging set of crises. You have a homelessness emergency<\/a>, an affordable housing crisis, a billion-dollar structural financial challenge<\/a> that\u2019s resulted in the loss of thousands of key city jobs. You had a firestorm<\/a> that destroyed an entire neighborhood. And you have the federal government at war<\/a> with the people and the government of Los Angeles.<\/p>\n

And underneath that, you have an existential challenge to Hollywood<\/a>, which is unfolding. And you have crumbling infrastructure. <\/p>\n

And you have people feeling that government can\u2019t really fix any of these things, that the money we spend gets wasted, fair or unfair. That\u2019s a challenge.<\/p>\n

Do you think the government is wasting taxpayer money?<\/b><\/p>\n

Every institution has some level of waste. The problem with Los Angeles government and the public sector in California is an aversion to innovation. <\/p>\n

We\u2019ve fallen behind the private sector in adapting to the new world of advancing technology and changing demographics. That\u2019s fixable, and that\u2019s what I was advocating for.<\/p>\n

What would it look like to fix these problems? Who\u2019s responsible, and who is currently dropping the ball?<\/b><\/p>\n

The lack of responsibility is built into the City Charter<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Tell me more about what you mean by that. <\/b><\/p>\n

The people who originally wrote the charter a hundred years ago intentionally designed the system to diffuse authority, which therefore diffused accountability. So it\u2019s really difficult to know who is in charge of any given thing. <\/p>\n

A clear example is that the department heads have 16 bosses. They report to the mayor, but in each of the council districts, the council members think that the department heads report to them. That they … have to make the council member happy with what\u2019s going on in their district, whether it\u2019s trimming trees on a particular street or fixing a sidewalk in front of a constituent\u2019s home, the general managers [of city departments] are subject to extreme and constant political pressure. <\/p>\n

That distracts them from fixing the system so that we\u2019re doing a better job, so that there are fewer resident complaints, so that a constituent wouldn\u2019t have to go to their council member to get their street fixed. The street would get fixed every 10 years.<\/p>\n

But if you are have 16 bosses and and a continually shifting set of priorities, it\u2019s difficult, if not impossible, to put in place systemic solutions.<\/p>\n

And in terms of who do you blame: Do you blame the general manager? Do you blame the mayor? Do you blame your council member? Do you blame the lack of resources that the city has to allocate? <\/p>\n

The answer is yes.<\/p>\n

What needs to change?<\/b><\/p>\n

What I advocated is designing the city to work in the 21st century, which means a chief operating officer who works for the mayor to make sure the city runs effectively across 44 departments. We don\u2019t have such a person now. <\/p>\n

It means a chief financial officer. The responsibilities of a chief financial officer are [currently] divided between four different offices in the city, so it\u2019s difficult, again, to point to one person who\u2019s in charge of keeping the city fiscally sound.<\/p>\n

The charter calls for a one-year budget, but we could do a two-year budget and simply update it once a year and be consistent with the City Charter. But then we would have a much broader view of the city\u2019s financial future, and we wouldn\u2019t waste so much time on a budget process that takes 11 of the 12 months and produces very little change.<\/p>\n

State of play<\/p>\n

\u2014 SAFER CITY: <\/b>L.A. is on pace for its lowest homicide total<\/a> in nearly 60 years as killings plummet, according to an LAPD tally. The falling murder rate mirrors a national trend in other big cities. As my colleague Libor Jany reports, it also paints a decidedly different picture than the Gotham City image offered by President Trump and other senior U.S. officials as justification for the deployment of military troops in L.A. in recent weeks.<\/p>\n

\u2014MORE RAIDS FALLOUT: <\/b>Mayor Karen Bass<\/b> announced a plan Friday<\/a> to provide direct cash assistance to people who have been affected by the Trump administration\u2019s sweeping immigration raids. The money will come from philanthropic partners, not city coffers, and the cash cards will be distributed by immigrant rights groups. <\/p>\n

\u2014MOTION TO INTERVENE: <\/b>The city and county of Los Angeles are among the local governments seeking to join a lawsuit<\/a> calling on the Trump administration to stop \u201cunlawful detentions\u201d during the ongoing immigration sweeps. The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Public Counsel and immigrant rights groups last week. <\/p>\n

\u2014IN MEMORIAM: <\/b>Longtime former executive director of the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs Jaime Regalado <\/b>died last month at age 80. Born in Boyle Heights, Regalado served in the U.S. Navy and was the founding editor of California Politics & Policy and the California Policy Issues Annual. He led the Pat Brown Institute at Cal State L.A. from 1991 to 2011. <\/p>\n

\u2014\u201cSOMEONE GOOFED\u201d: <\/b>When L.A. County Supervisors Lindsey Horvath <\/b>and Janice Hahn <\/b>co-wrote Measure G,<\/a> a sprawling overhaul of county government that voters passed last November, they didn\u2019t realize they would also be repealing Measure J, a landmark criminal justice measure that voters had passed four years earlier. Thanks to an administrative screw-up for the ages, that\u2019s exactly what happened.<\/a> The relevant changes won\u2019t go into effect until 2028, so county leaders have some time to undo their oops. <\/p>\n

\u2014DISASTER AVERTED: <\/b>A potentially tragic situation was averted Wednesday night, after all 31 workers in a partially collapsed Los Angeles County sanitation tunnel were able to make their way to safety<\/a>. Work on the tunnel has been halted, and the county sanitation district board is looking into what caused the collapse. <\/p>\n

\u2014POSTCARD FROM SANTA MONICA: <\/b>In the long shadow of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller<\/b>\u2018s hard-line anti-immigration policies, local and national observers alike are paying renewed attention to Miller\u2019s upbringing in the famously liberal enclave once dubbed \u201cthe People\u2019s Republic of Santa Monica.\u201d Join me for a deep dive into Miller\u2019s time<\/a> at Santa Monica High School and learn why some of his former classmates think he\u2019s getting his revenge on Southern California. <\/p>\n

QUICK HITS<\/p>\n