{"id":620631,"date":"2026-02-27T19:57:18","date_gmt":"2026-02-27T19:57:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/620631\/"},"modified":"2026-02-27T19:57:18","modified_gmt":"2026-02-27T19:57:18","slug":"nasa-revises-plans-for-future-artemis-missions-cancels-upgrades-to-sls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/620631\/","title":{"rendered":"NASA revises plans for future Artemis missions, cancels upgrades to SLS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Updated 12 p.m. Eastern with additional details and comments.<\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 NASA announced major changes to its Artemis lunar architecture, adding a test flight of lunar landers in low Earth orbit while canceling planned upgrades to the Space Launch System.<\/p>\n<p>At a Feb. 27 briefing, NASA said it would change the schedule of upcoming Artemis missions to add a flight in 2027 where Orion will rendezvous and dock with lunar landers from Blue Origin and\/or SpaceX while in low Earth orbit. The mission would also test a new spacesuit being developed by Axiom Space.<\/p>\n<p>That new mission will be named Artemis 3, which had been reserved for the first crewed lunar landing attempt. Under the new plan, the first lunar landing would be attempted on Artemis 4 in 2028, with the possibility of an Artemis 5 in late 2028.<\/p>\n<p>The new Artemis 3 would be analogous to Apollo 9, a mission in early 1969 that was the first test of the Lunar Module in space, including docking tests in low Earth orbit.<\/p>\n<p>NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said the new mission would allow NASA to move at a faster rate as it faces competition from China, which is planning its first crewed lunar lander for around 2030.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNASA must standardize its approach, increase flight rate safely and execute on the President\u2019s\u00a0national space policy,\u201d he said in a statement. \u201cWith credible competition from our\u00a0greatest\u00a0geopolitical adversary\u00a0increasing by the day, we need to move faster,\u00a0eliminate\u00a0delays and\u00a0achieve our\u00a0objectives.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As part of those changes to increase flight rate, NASA said it was abandoning plans to upgrade the SLS after Artemis 3. The first three SLS launches use the Block 1 configuration, with the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) as the upper stage. Future SLS launches were to use the Block 1B version, with the larger Exploration Upper Stage.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, NASA said it will no longer develop the Block 1B, using instead a \u201cnear Block 1\u201d configuration. The agency did not disclose details on the specific upper stage it will use; the ICPS is based on the upper stage for the Delta 4, which is no longer in production.<\/p>\n<p>Maintaining the Block 1 configuration is intended to allow for a faster flight rate. Isaacman has publicly expressed frustration with the low flight rate of SLS \u2014 Artemis 2, the second SLS launch, will take place more than three years after Artemis 1 \u2014 that he believes may explain the issues such as hydrogen leaks seen during preparations for Artemis 2.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLaunching a rocket as important and as complex as SLS every three years is not a path to success,\u201d Isaacman said at the briefing after comparing the technical issues seen during both Artemis 1 and 2. \u201cWhen you\u2019re launching every three years, your skills atrophy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Being able to launch more frequently, he noted, would also allow NASA to make smaller technical steps between missions, rather than going directly to a lunar landing on Artemis 3 as previously planned. The <a href=\"https:\/\/spacenews.com\/nasa-safety-panel-recommends-review-of-artemis-plans\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) had previously warned of the high risk to Artemis 3<\/a> given the large number of first-time activities on that mission.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA wide objective gap between missions is also not a pathway to success,\u201d he said. \u201cWe didn\u2019t go right to Apollo 11.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Details and reaction<\/p>\n<p>The announcement provided few technical details about the revised plan for Artemis 3 and future missions or changes to the SLS.<\/p>\n<p>Isaacman, for example, declined to identify who would manufacture the upper stage for the \u201cnear Block 1\u201d version of SLS after Artemis 3, or how that would be contracted. \u201cWe\u2019ve been discussing with industry this strategy for several weeks,\u201d he said. \u201cWe obviously have confidence in our ability to source and integrate a more standardized second stage.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re going to work with our partners and make sure we handle that in the right way,\u201d NASA Associate Administrator Amit Kshatriya said at the briefing when asked about the effective cancellation of the Exploration Upper Stage, but did not elaborate.<\/p>\n<p>The move to speed up SLS launches comes as both Blue Origin and SpaceX are working on plans to accelerate work on their Human Landing System landers for Artemis. Neither company, though, has released details about those revised development efforts, nor has NASA.<\/p>\n<p>Accelerating Artemis missions while not upgrading SLS will have some \u201cputs and takes\u201d on the overall cost of Artemis, Isaacman said, with standardizing vehicles saving money but an increased cadence, including hiring more people, to cost money.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are areas where we expect savings as a result of this approach. There are areas where we expect to spend more,\u201d he said, without estimating if there would be a net cost increase or reduction. \u201cWe do believe we have the resources to achieve this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The changes have been briefed with key members of Congress, Isaacman said, part of what he called a \u201cno surprises\u201d policy of working with Capitol Hill. \u201cThey all understand that this is the path forward,\u201d he said. \u201cI don\u2019t think I heard a single objection on these subjects.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He said that while the new plan addresses some of the objections raised by ASAP about the original plan for Artemis 3, it was not as a result of collaborating with that independent panel. \u201cASAP was right to call out some of our shortcomings and we should be addressing them. It just happens to be in parallel.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>The changes were coordinated with industry as well. \u201cWe didn\u2019t just decide to do this today without making sure we assessed the inventory of hardware that we have available,\u201d Kshatriya said, citing progress on development of future SLS and Orion vehicles as well as SpaceX\u2019s Starship.<\/p>\n<p>The revised plan has the support of Boeing, the prime contractor for the SLS and who had been working on the Exploration Upper Stage.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs NASA lays out an accelerated launch schedule, our workforce and supply chain are prepared to meet the increased production needs,\u201d Steve Parker, head of Boeing\u2019s Defense, Space and Security business unit, said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>Lockheed Martin, the Orion prime contractor, also endorsed the new architecture. \u201cWe\u2019re excited about Administrator Isaacman\u2019s bold decision to increase the Artemis launch cadence,\u201d Robert Lightfoot, president of Lockheed Martin Space, said in a statement. \u201cFlight-proven systems like Orion will be essential to the future of Artemis, and we are fully committed to meeting the delivery timelines for these historic missions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n\tRelated<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Updated 12 p.m. Eastern with additional details and comments. WASHINGTON \u2014 NASA announced major changes to its Artemis&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":568493,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[24],"tags":[3295,26557,916,159,18437,16988,783,67,132,68],"class_list":["post-620631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-space","tag-artemis","tag-jared-isaacman","tag-nasa","tag-science","tag-sls","tag-sn","tag-space","tag-united-states","tag-unitedstates","tag-us"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116144363673405414","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=620631"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620631\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/568493"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=620631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=620631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=620631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}