{"id":64523,"date":"2025-07-14T09:36:15","date_gmt":"2025-07-14T09:36:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/64523\/"},"modified":"2025-07-14T09:36:15","modified_gmt":"2025-07-14T09:36:15","slug":"questions-remain-at-secret-service-one-year-after-trump-rally-shooting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/64523\/","title":{"rendered":"Questions remain at Secret Service one year after Trump rally shooting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON (AP) \u2014 In many ways, the assassination attempt against Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania campaign stop was a\u00a0perfect storm of failings\u00a0coming together that allowed 20-year-old Michael Thomas Crooks to climb on top of a nearby building and take eight shots at the once and future president.<\/p>\n<p>One attendee was killed, two others wounded and a bullet grazed Trump\u2019s ear before a Secret Service counter sniper opened fire on Crooks and killed him. That day jolted an already chaotic race for the White House and\u00a0solidified Trump\u2019s iconic status\u00a0in his party and beyond.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/politics\/watch-live-house-task-force-on-trump-assassination-attempt-in-butler-pa-holds-final-hearing\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>WATCH:<\/strong> Secret Service director says agency is \u2018reorganizing\u2019 at House hearing on Trump assassination attempt<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It also became a turning point for the agency tasked with protecting the president. As more details emerged about what went wrong, questions multiplied: What happened to the Secret Service\u2019s planning? Why was a rooftop with a clear line of sight to Trump left unguarded? What motivated the shooter?<\/p>\n<p>Another\u00a0incident in September\u00a0where a gunman camped in the shrubbery outside one of Trump\u2019s golf courses before being spotted and shot at by a Secret Service agent also raised questions about the agency\u2019s performance.<\/p>\n<p>A year after Butler, multiple investigations have detailed the breakdowns that day. Under a new leader hired by Trump, the agency has been pushing to address those problems but key questions remain.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis was a wake-up call for the Secret Service,\u201d said retired supervisory agent Bobby McDonald, who\u2019s now a criminal justice lecturer at the University of New Haven.<\/p>\n<p>A Senate committee and federal auditing agency over the weekend released reports about the Secret Service\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s a look at what went wrong, what\u2019s been done to address problems and the questions still unanswered.<\/p>\n<p>How\u2019d he get on that roof? Who was talking to who?<\/p>\n<p>All the investigations zeroed in on a few specific problems.<\/p>\n<p>The building with a clear sight line to the stage where the president was speaking only 135 meters (157 yards) away was left unguarded. Crooks eventually boosted himself up there and fired eight shots with an AR-style rifle.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0Secret Service\u2019s investigation\u00a0into its own agency\u2019s conduct said that it wasn\u2019t that the line-of-sight risks weren\u2019t known about ahead of time. It was that multiple personnel assessed them as \u201cacceptable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Supervisors had expected large pieces of farm equipment would be situated to block the view from the building. Those ultimately weren\u2019t placed, and staffers who visited the site before the rally didn\u2019t tell their supervisors that the line-of-sight concerns hadn\u2019t been addressed, the report said.<\/p>\n<p>Another glaring problem: fragmented communications between the Secret Service and the local law enforcement that the agency regularly relies on to secure events.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of having one unified command post with representatives from every agency providing security in the same room, there were two command posts at the rally. One investigation described a \u201cchaotic mixture\u201d of radio, cell phone, text, and email used to communicate that day.<\/p>\n<p>And a year later, the investigations are still coming.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere were multiple, unacceptable failures in the planning and execution of the July 13 Butler rally,\u201d said the Senate Committee on Homeland Security &amp; Governmental Affairs\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hsgac.senate.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/USSS-Chairman-Report-Final-July-20254.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">in a report released Sunday<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The committee found that the agency denied \u201cmultiple requests for additional staff, assets, and resources to protect President Trump\u201d during the presidential campaign. The committee said that included at least two requests for the Butler rally.<\/p>\n<p>The agency\u2019s former director, Kim Cheatle, last year told a House panel before she resigned that the agency didn\u2019t deny any requests for the rally.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement released Sunday in response to the Senate report, Cheatle said, \u201cFor the Butler rally, I actually did direct additional assets to be provided, particularly in the form of agency countersnipers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Another report by the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.grassley.senate.gov\/imo\/media\/doc\/gao_usss_report_released_by_chairman_grassley.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Government Accountability Office<\/a>\u00a0requested by Republican Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley criticized the agency\u2019s practices for sharing threat information. That report said senior-level agency officials knew of a specific threat to Trump in the days leading up to the rally. It wasn\u2019t specific to the rally but it wasn\u2019t shared with the agents or local law enforcement planning for it.<\/p>\n<p>The report said the lack of information-sharing was due to the agency\u2019s \u201csiloed information sharing practices.\u201d The report didn\u2019t offer details on the threat\u00a0although reporting at the time\u00a0indicated that a threat to Trump\u2019s life from Iran prompted additional security in the days before the Butler rally.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Ensure such an event can never be repeated\u2019<\/p>\n<p>The agency said Sunday that following the assassination attempt, they took a \u201cserious look\u201d at their operations and have undergone significant reforms to address what happened that day.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this week the agency issued its own report Thursday about what it has done.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSince President Trump appointed me as director of the United States Secret Service, I have kept my experience on July 13 top of mind, and the agency has taken many steps to ensure such an event can never be repeated in the future,\u201d said Sean Curran, whom Trump tasked with leading the agency. Curran was one of the agents standing next to Trump as he was hustled off the stage after the shooting.<\/p>\n<p>The agency said it had implemented 21 of the 46 recommendations made by Congressional oversight bodies. The rest were either in progress or not up to the agency to implement.<\/p>\n<p>Some of what they\u2019ve done involves new equipment and a greater emphasis on addressing threats from above. They\u2019ve created a new Aviation Division to oversee aerial operations like drones. The agency said it has two armored ATVs for use on golf courses and is producing another three. And they\u2019re purchasing mobile command vehicles that will be pre-positioned around the country.<\/p>\n<p>But much of what the agency says it has done is about changing policies and procedures to address those July 13 lapses \u2014 things like revising their manual to \u201cadvance procedures and communication practices\u201d when it comes to coordinating with local law enforcement or clarifying who\u2019s responsible for events where protectees are appearing.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ve updated their procedures about documenting line-of-sight concerns and how those concerns are going to be addressed.<\/p>\n<p>So far it doesn\u2019t appear that anyone has been or will be fired, although the agency\u2019s director at the time,\u00a0Cheatle, swiftly resigned. The agency said Thursday that six staffers have been disciplined with suspensions ranging from 10 to 42 days without pay; the six were placed on restricted duty or nonoperational positions. Their identities and positions were not released.<\/p>\n<p>The lack of firings has led to criticism. The Senate report said more than six people should have been disciplined and the penalties were too weak to match the severity of what happened.<\/p>\n<p>What we still don\u2019t know<\/p>\n<p>In many ways\u00a0Crooks and his motivations\u00a0are still a mystery.<\/p>\n<p>He was killed by a Secret Service countersniper and did not leave much information about why he did what he did. Investigators say they believe he acted alone and they didn\u2019t find any threatening comments or ideological positions on social media that shed light on his thinking.<\/p>\n<p>And while it\u2019s clear what went wrong in Butler, questions linger about how things that were so clearly problematic \u2014 like that open roof \u2014 weren\u2019t addressed ahead of time.<\/p>\n<p>Anthony Cangelosi, a former Secret Service agent who is now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, said that without being able to read the interviews with the agents involved in the Butler planning it\u2019s hard to know exactly why they did what they did. A year later, he still struggles with how so many things went wrong.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI can\u2019t understand how many errors were made on that site that day,\u201d he said. \u201cIf they agreed to leave that roof unoccupied, I can\u2019t \u2026 understand it for the life of me.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The widow\u00a0of Corey Comperatore, who died during the Butler assassination attempt, echoed some of that sentiment during an interview with Fox News this week.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhy was that such a failure? Why weren\u2019t they paying attention? Why did they think that that roof didn\u2019t need covered? I want to sit down and talk to them,\u201d Helen Comperatore said.<\/p>\n<p>Cangelosi said he still questions whether the agency asked for additional personnel to cover a busy election year and if they did, whether those requests were granted. He thinks the Secret Service needs better pay to retain agents tempted to leave the agency for other federal government jobs.<\/p>\n<p>McDonald said he suspects part of the problem ahead of the Butler rally was that the Secret Service might have had a hard time understanding that the type of protection Trump needed wasn\u2019t the same as for other former presidents.<\/p>\n<p>He said it \u201cboggles the mind\u201d how Crooks was able to get on that roof and said that \u201ccommunication\u201d and \u201ccomplacency\u201d are the two issues that he thinks really went wrong in Butler.<\/p>\n<p>But he also said that he feels the agency is moving in the right direction. \u201cA lot of good people doing a lot good work there,\u201d he said, \u201cand I hope they continue to move in the right direction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\n                    Take our science survey\n                <\/p>\n<p class=\"invite_body\">\n                    Now is your chance to help us shape future coverage of the stories that matter most to you.\n                <\/p>\n<p>                <a href=\"https:\/\/pbsnewshour.formstack.com\/forms\/tipping_point_mississippi_river_2025\" class=\"donation-link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n                    Take survey now<\/p>\n<p>                <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"WASHINGTON (AP) \u2014 In many ways, the assassination attempt against Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania campaign stop was&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":64524,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[51,50,52],"class_list":{"0":"post-64523","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"tag-headlines","9":"tag-news","10":"tag-top-stories"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114850914885465812","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64523\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}