{"id":655588,"date":"2026-03-14T17:55:11","date_gmt":"2026-03-14T17:55:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/655588\/"},"modified":"2026-03-14T17:55:11","modified_gmt":"2026-03-14T17:55:11","slug":"wada-to-weigh-barring-trump-from-l-a-olympics-over-unpaid-dues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/655588\/","title":{"rendered":"WADA to weigh barring Trump from L.A. Olympics over unpaid dues"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The World Anti-Doping Agency is considering rewriting its rules to try barring President Donald Trump and all U.S. government officials from attending the Los Angeles Olympics in 2028<\/a> in a move that could also have implications for the World Cup<\/a> being hosted by the U.S. this summer.<\/p>\n

The proposal, on the agenda for next Tuesday\u2019s meeting of the global drug-fighting watchdog\u2019s executive committee, is the latest maneuver to come out of a yearslong refusal of the U.S. government to pay its annual dues to WADA. The refusal is part of the American government\u2019s unanimous, bipartisan protest of the agency\u2019s handling of a case involving Chinese swimmers<\/a> and other issues.<\/p>\n

The Associated Press learned of the agenda item through correspondence it obtained between WADA and European officials involved in the agency\u2019s decision-making. Two others with knowledge of the agenda confirmed the existence of the rules proposal to AP; they were not authorized to speak publicly about the agenda, which has not been released publicly.<\/p>\n

WADA spokesman James Fitzgerald said \u201cthere is nothing new here,\u201d noting that discussions related to the issue of what to do about governments withholding funding have been ongoing since 2020 and aren\u2019t directly related to the U.S. <\/p>\n

The proposal was, in fact, first brought up in 2024, when U.S. authorities successfully lobbied for its rejection. The U.S. has since lost its seat on the executive committee.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn spite of WADA\u2019s increasing threats, we continue to stand firm in our demand for accountability and transparency from WADA to ensure fair competition in sport,\u201d said Sara Carter, the director of the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). <\/p>\n

The rule, if passed, would figure to be mostly symbolic, given the limits an international sports federation could have on the president of a country attending an event inside his own borders.<\/p>\n

\u201cI have never heard of a $50-million-budget Swiss foundation being able to enforce a rule to, for example, prevent the United States president from going anywhere,\u201d said Carter\u2019s predecessor at ONDCP, Rahul Gupta, who was on the WADA executive committee two years ago and led the movement to reject the proposal. \u201cAnd the next question you have to ask is: How are you going to enforce it? Are they going to post a red notice from Interpol? It\u2019s ludicrous. It\u2019s clear they have not thought this through.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a news release after this story published, WADA said the AP story was \u201centirely misleading,\u201d focusing on Fitzgerald\u2019s statement to the AP that if proposals being discussed were \u201cintroduced, given that the rules would not apply retroactively, the FIFA World Cup, LA and Salt Lake City Games (in 2034) would not be covered.\u201d <\/p>\n

Fitzgerald\u2019s only answer to three emails from AP seeking clarification on his initial response \u2014 specifically about how a rule that had not yet been adopted could or couldn\u2019t be applied retroactively on events that are scheduled for the future \u2014 was: \u201cI\u2019m trying to say that it would not apply retroactively so those events would not be covered. Given that and the next meeting of the Board being scheduled for November, I don\u2019t see how it could come into play for this year\u2019s World Cup.\u201d<\/p>\n

WADA suggests it could move quickly, but impact on upcoming World Cup hazy<\/p>\n

The next meeting of the Foundation Board, which would make the ultimate decision, isn\u2019t scheduled until November. But a WADA response last month to a question about potential timing of the rule\u2019s passage from the European authorities said: \u201cThe proposal could be implemented without undue delay. If necessary, the Foundation Board could consider the proposal by circular or within the context of an extraordinary meeting.\u201d<\/p>\n

According to a draft of the proposal, the rule would apply to governments that have not paid dues by Jan. 31 of the year after they\u2019re billed. The U.S. hasn\u2019t paid its WADA dues since 2023. There was no mention of \u201cretroactivity\u201d or lack thereof in the document the executives are considering.<\/p>\n

The proposal calls for a three-tiered set of sanctions for countries that don\u2019t pay dues. In the U.S. case, that amounts to around $3.7 million from last year, plus $3.6 million it didn\u2019t pay in 2024. Among the most extreme sanctions include \u201cgovernment representatives being excluded from participation in major events such as World Championships and Olympic & Paralympic Games.\u201d <\/p>\n

That would include Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance and members of Congress, who recently approved hundreds of millions in funding for security and other logistics<\/a> for the World Cup and Los Angeles Games.<\/p>\n

Representatives from the International Olympic Committee, FIFA and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee did not respond to emails from AP seeking comment on how a ban on Trump and other U.S. officials might be enforced. <\/p>\n

US has been asking WADA to undergo independent audits<\/p>\n

WADA\u2019s budget was pegged at $57.5 million for 2025. It receives half its funding from the IOC and the other half from governments across the globe. Contributions from the governments are loosely based on the size of their athletic teams, and the U.S. has always paid one of the biggest bills.<\/p>\n

This squabble has been festering since the first Trump administration, rooted in America\u2019s distrust of the global anti-doping system, which came under international scrutiny first for its handling of a Russian doping scandal dating to before the Sochi Games in Russia in 2014. <\/p>\n

Then, in 2024, news came of 23 Chinese swimmers \u2014 some of them on the team that went to the Paris Olympics \u2014 who were allowed to compete despite testing positive. WADA accepted the Chinese doping regulator\u2019s theory that the athletes had been contaminated by traces of banned heart medication in a hotel kitchen. <\/p>\n

The ONDCP and Congress under both the Trump and Biden administrations have withheld the payments to WADA. <\/p>\n

In the most recent flare-up, the government restricted payment until WADA subjected itself to an independent audit. WADA defended its auditing practices and, at the Milan Cortina Games last month, once again called on the U.S. to pay the dues.<\/p>\n

Now, the agency looks for more leverage in its attempts to collect.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis initiative is aimed at better protecting WADA\u2019s funding so that it can deliver on its mission to protect clean sport,\u201d said Fitzgerald, the spokesman for WADA. \u201cIf WADA\u2019s funding is cut, it is ultimately athletes who will suffer. Indeed, athletes [including those on WADA\u2019s Executive Committee and Foundation Board] have continuously expressed their support for this initiative.\u201d <\/p>\n

Pells writes for the Associated Press. Associated Press reporter Darlene Superville contributed from Washington.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The World Anti-Doping Agency is considering rewriting its rules to try barring President Donald Trump and all U.S.…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":655589,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5123],"tags":[277877,277876,277878,8387,1582,276,2576,208959,1258,2961,224,5337,6514,36700,277,277879,1439,277875,21490,1628],"class_list":["post-655588","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-los-angeles","tag-agenda","tag-american-government","tag-annual-due","tag-ap","tag-ca","tag-california","tag-event","tag-executive-committee","tag-funding","tag-la","tag-los-angeles","tag-losangeles","tag-proposal","tag-rule","tag-trump","tag-u-s-government-official","tag-u-s","tag-wada","tag-world-cup","tag-year"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116228818699582886","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/655588","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=655588"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/655588\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/655589"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=655588"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=655588"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=655588"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}