{"id":676172,"date":"2026-03-23T14:39:15","date_gmt":"2026-03-23T14:39:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/676172\/"},"modified":"2026-03-23T14:39:15","modified_gmt":"2026-03-23T14:39:15","slug":"why-some-families-will-pay-more-than-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/676172\/","title":{"rendered":"Why some families will pay more than others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A container ship is seen docked at the Port of Los Angeles on March 13, 2026 in Los Angeles, California.<\/p>\n<p>Justin Sullivan | Getty Images<\/p>\n<p>Tariffs are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2026\/02\/20\/supreme-court-trump-tariffs-ruling-your-money.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">expected to cost<\/a> the average household several hundred dollars to perhaps more than $1,000 this year, according to various economic analyses. <\/p>\n<p>But each household may wind up paying more or less based on a variety of factors, including family size, geography and typical purchases, economists said. <\/p>\n<p>Low earners are also likely to feel the impact more than wealthier ones, they said. <\/p>\n<p><a id=\"headline0\"\/>The cost of tariffs for households<\/p>\n<p>Tariffs are a tax on imports. They&#8217;re generally paid by the U.S. entity importing the foreign goods.<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Reserve Bank of New York found in a <a href=\"https:\/\/libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org\/2026\/02\/who-is-paying-for-the-2025-u-s-tariffs\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">recent paper<\/a> that U.S. firms and consumers bore &#8220;the bulk&#8221; \u2014 roughly 90% \u2014 of the economic burden of tariffs imposed in 2025. <\/p>\n<p>The extent to which businesses pass through some or all of those import taxes to consumers via higher prices fluctuates by company, economists said. <\/p>\n<p>Under the current tariff regime, the average household <a href=\"https:\/\/budgetlab.yale.edu\/research\/state-tariffs-march-9-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">will pay an extra $570 in 2026<\/a> due to tariffs, according to a March 9 analysis by the Yale University Budget Lab, a nonpartisan policy research center.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"InlineVideo-videoThumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/108279829-17738593821773859379-44658311109-1080pnbcnews.jpg\" alt=\"Fed Chair Powell: Inflation overshoot is mainly from goods and tariffs\"\/>Read more CNBC personal finance coverage<\/p>\n<p>Quickly thereafter, the Trump administration put a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2026\/02\/20\/trump-global-trade-tariff-supreme-court.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">temporary 10% universal tariff<\/a> on imports from all countries, with some exceptions. President Donald Trump announced that these tariffs would increase to 15% but that change <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crfb.org\/blogs\/how-much-will-trumps-new-10-or-15-tariffs-raise\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">isn&#8217;t yet official<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>There are also levies on steel, aluminum, automobiles, copper, trucks, buses, wood products and semiconductors, among other things.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, there&#8217;s &#8220;lots of variation&#8221; in the ultimate financial burden of tariffs on households, said John Ricco, associate director of policy analysis at the Yale Budget Lab. <\/p>\n<p><a id=\"headline1\"\/>Family size and geography<\/p>\n<p>The biggest driver is household or family size, Ricco said. <\/p>\n<p>The average U.S. household has about three people in it, Ricco said. <\/p>\n<p>However, households with more people would likely buy more than a family with fewer people \u2014 and would therefore generally be exposed to higher tariff costs relative to smaller families, he said. <\/p>\n<p>Where consumers live also matters, Ricco said. For example, a 1% price increase in California is a much higher dollar figure than in Kansas due to the relative costs of living in those states, he said. <\/p>\n<p><a id=\"headline2\"\/>What you consume<\/p>\n<p>A employee on the Peugeot vehicle assembly line at the Stellantis NV auto plant in Sochaux, France, on Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Depending on the kinds of goods you consume, you could see higher or lower cost burdens,&#8221; Ricco said. <\/p>\n<p>For example, tariffs tend to affect physical goods more than services, such as travel, entertainment and dining out, economists said. <\/p>\n<p>Of course, that&#8217;s not to say services aren&#8217;t affected at all. Tariffs on agricultural products can filter through to a restaurant&#8217;s bottom line, leading them to raise menu prices, for example. But goods take more of a direct hit, economists said. <\/p>\n<p>Therefore, households whose consumption leans more heavily toward goods and less toward services are more exposed to the financial impact of tariffs, economists said. <\/p>\n<p>It also depends largely on the categories of goods that households buy. <\/p>\n<p>For example, families buying electronic equipment such as computers \u2014 which contain a lot of specialized metals that are exposed to tariffs right now \u2014 or clothing or automobiles are relatively more exposed to higher costs than other households that aren&#8217;t buying these products, Ricco said. <\/p>\n<p><a id=\"headline3\"\/>Impact depends on income<\/p>\n<p>A cargo ship sits in New York Harbor on Nov. 19, 2025 in New York City. <\/p>\n<p>Spencer Plat | Getty Images<\/p>\n<p>Wealthier households tend to buy more than lower-earning households. <\/p>\n<p>So, in dollar terms, higher earners are more exposed to tariffs: The average annual costs to households in the bottom 10% and top 10% by income are about $315 and $1,325, respectively, according to the Yale Budget Lab. <\/p>\n<p>However, the narrative changes when costs are assessed as a share of overall household income. <\/p>\n<p>That $315 represents a 0.8% reduction in after-tax income for the bottom 10% of households, according to the Yale Budget Lab. However, the $1,325 represents a loss of just 0.3% in after-tax income for the top 10% \u2014 less than half the burden of the lowest-income households. <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"InlineVideo-videoThumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/108277743-17734025451773402542-44543770510-1080pnbcnews.jpg\" alt=\"U.S. Trade Rep. Jamieson Greer on U.S.-China trade relations, Iran war impact and tariffs agenda\"\/><\/p>\n<p>This is why economists call tariffs a &#8220;regressive&#8221; tax: Because they place a larger relative cost burden on lower earners.<\/p>\n<p>Lower-income households generally spend a greater fraction of their income than higher-income households, economists said. Higher earners devote a lower share of their income to necessities and have more disposable income to save and invest, in addition to buying things, they said.<\/p>\n<p>Further, low earners tend to buy more goods and fewer services relative to high earners, economists said. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Richer and poorer households buy different goods, different quality of goods, buy from different stores,&#8221; Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a nonpartisan economic policy think tank, said in an e-mail. &#8220;Most importantly, poorer households spend a much larger share of their income and, thus, pay a larger share of their income in import taxes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/preferences\/source?q=https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A container ship is seen docked at the Port of Los Angeles on March 13, 2026 in Los&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":676173,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[12],"tags":[160181,64,81,69,79,51319,26391,273283,147852,86476,255,9159,258886,149,75,130,67,132,68,277515],"class_list":["post-676172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-economy","tag-alcoa-corp","tag-business","tag-business-news","tag-donald-trump","tag-economy","tag-freeport-mcmoran-inc","tag-government-taxation-and-revenue","tag-invesco-db-commodity-index-tracking-fund","tag-ishares-u-s-home-construction-etf","tag-nucor-corp","tag-personal-finance","tag-social-issues","tag-southern-copper-corp","tag-taiwan-semiconductor-manufacturing-co-ltd","tag-tariff","tag-trade","tag-united-states","tag-unitedstates","tag-us","tag-vaneck-steel-etf"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116279008776651156","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/676172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=676172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/676172\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/676173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=676172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=676172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=676172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}