We asked Oppezzo and other Stanford Medicine experts to help us break down protein fact and fiction \u2014 and get at the science behind conflicting dietary recommendations. Here are five key takeaways.<\/p>\n
1. Protein intake fuels the creation of important bodily proteins.<\/p>\n
While contradictory dietary advice might muddy the waters, it\u2019s clear that we need protein in our diets. Broadly speaking, all food can be broken down into three macro-nutrients: carbohydrates, fat and protein. And, of course, many foods contain all three. But if you\u2019re consuming a calorie, it has to come from one of those three sources.<\/p>\n
Protein is essential for many things in our bodies. At its molecular root, dietary protein provides many of the building blocks we need to make our own bodies\u2019 proteins, which in turn are used to build and carry out pretty much every bodily function imaginable.<\/p>\n
\u201cProtein can take the form of your muscles, your hair, your skin \u2014 everything has protein in it,\u201d said Jonathan Long<\/a>, PhD, an associate professor of pathology. \u201cAnd you can\u2019t get those constituents from fat or carbohydrates alone.\u201d<\/p>\n Our bodies\u2019 proteins \u2014 just the same as dietary proteins \u2014 are made up of strings of molecules called amino acids. There are 20 different amino acids, some of which we can synthesize from other compounds. But we must get nine of these, also called essential amino acids, from our diet. We simply can\u2019t build them out of other components.<\/p>\n When you eat dietary proteins, your body breaks down those long strings of amino acids into their component parts, which it then uses to build new proteins your body needs. Imagine pulling all the beads off of a necklace and then using those beads to make new kinds of jewelry.<\/p>\n 2. For some people, protein amounts are important for muscle retention.<\/p>\n Until just a few months ago, the federal RDA of dietary protein for adults was 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight. For a 150-pound adult, that\u2019s around 55 grams of protein a day, or the equivalent of an 8-ounce steak. The newly revised dietary guidelines instead recommend 1.2 to 1.6 grams per kilogram, raising that 150-pound person\u2019s recommendation to 80 to 110 grams a day.<\/p>\n That\u2019s quite a jump \u2014 so what actually changed with the science? Nothing, said Christopher Gardner,<\/a> PhD, the director of nutrition studies at the Stanford Prevention Research Center.<\/p>\n \n Marily Oppezzo, Jonathan Long and Christopher Gardner\n <\/p>\n \u201cWere we really off by that much? What new evidence became available to show that we were off by that much? There really isn\u2019t any,\u201d Gardner said. \u201cProtein has become one of the single most heavily marketed products I\u2019ve ever seen. Everything is marketed with protein in it.\u201d<\/p>\n Oppezzo\u2019s view is slightly more nuanced. She\u2019s concerned about the protein intake of adults over 40 and the growing segment of the population taking medications to lose weight. For these two groups, there is evidence that eating more dietary protein than 0.8 grams per kilogram can help stave off some of the muscle loss that commonly accompanies aging and weight loss.<\/p>\n For those with a body mass index<\/a> of more than 30, the calculation is a bit more complicated. Rather than using their actual body weight, they should use an \u201cadjusted body weight<\/a>,\u201d Oppezzo said, because lean mass needs energy to build it and maintain it. For her clients who are actively losing weight, such as those taking a weight-loss medication, she advises 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of the adjusted body weight. That\u2019s because people eating a reduced calorie diet are at risk of muscle loss.<\/p>\n However, Oppezzo points out that resistance training is far more important than what you eat to maintain your muscles. One of her mentors, McMaster University nutrition researcher Stuart Phillips, PhD, likes to say that protein isn\u2019t the cake, exercise is \u2014 protein is only a thin layer of frosting on the cake of resistance training.<\/p>\n \u201cThe biggest thing that stops muscle loss is strength training,\u201d Oppezzo said. \u201cWhat higher protein adds to that is pretty small potatoes.\u201d<\/p>\n 3. Maybe there wasn\u2019t a protein intake problem to begin with.<\/p>\n The difference between the old and new dietary guidelines could be moot, because Americans are eating plenty of protein already. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey<\/a>, adult men in the U.S. are eating around 90 to 100 grams of protein a day, and women are getting 65 to 75 grams. That\u2019s already in line with the new recommendations.<\/p>\n Some people think that the old RDA was a suggested minimum and that more protein is always better. But that\u2019s a misconception, Gardner said. In the 1980s, scientists calculated adults\u2019 protein needs through controlled diet studies in which they measured everything that went in and everything that came out.<\/p>\n The outcome of those studies is known as the estimated average requirement for protein, and it\u2019s only 0.66 grams per kilogram. To make sure they were meeting the needs of the entire U.S. population, they set the RDA 20% higher. That 0.8 grams per kilogram was designed to meet the needs of 98% of American adults, Gardner said, so it shouldn\u2019t be viewed as a minimum to \u201cbeat.\u201d<\/p>\n 4. With all the protein talk, we might be neglecting fiber.<\/p>\n While overconsuming protein likely isn\u2019t harmful on its own, it\u2019s important to look at where that extra protein is coming from, Gardner said. If it\u2019s from red meat, as the new dietary guidelines emphasize, folks might be consuming unhealthy levels of saturated fat.<\/p>\n And if we fill up on steaks and protein shakes, we\u2019re not eating enough fiber and other nutrients found primarily in plant-based foods. National surveys show that, unlike for protein, only 5% of Americans are meeting the RDA for fiber, which is critical for gut health and reducing the risk of cardiovascular and other chronic diseases.<\/p>\n \u201cThere are all kinds of antioxidants that can lower inflammation and prevent cancer, and those don\u2019t come in meat and cheese and protein bars,\u201d Gardner said.<\/p>\n There are plenty of foods that have both fiber and protein, Gardner said, such as beans and other legumes and whole grains. Unfortunately, these aren\u2019t the foods Americans typically turn to when increasing their protein intake.<\/p>\n \n Mila \/ Adobe Stock\n <\/p>\n \u201cAmericans hardly eat any legumes,\u201d he said. The average American eats less than 10 grams of legumes<\/a> per day. \u201cThere\u2019s plenty of room to increase that and get your fiber, your antioxidants and your plant protein, and have enough.\u201d<\/p>\n 5. There\u2019s no such thing as incomplete protein.<\/p>\n If there\u2019s one protein myth that Gardner wishes would die already, it\u2019s the fable of the incomplete protein. For years, common nutrition advice has posited that plants contain so-called incomplete proteins, while animal proteins are complete. If you\u2019re getting most of your protein from beans and legumes, the advice goes, you need to pair them with certain grains at the same meal to make up the difference.<\/p>\n That\u2019s bupkis, Gardner says. Plant proteins are not missing any of the 20 amino acids, although legumes have slightly less of one of those 20 than do animal proteins. If a person was eating only legumes and no excess protein, that lower amount of the single amino acid might be a problem. But that\u2019s not the reality of the American diet.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you need 50 grams of protein a day and you got only 50, then you\u2019d have to be careful that it\u2019s the right kind. But most Americans eat 80, 90, 100 grams of protein a day,\u201d Gardner said. \u201cAt that point the distribution doesn\u2019t have to be perfect, because you have so much extra.\u201d<\/p>\n Gardner and his colleagues published a paper in 2019<\/a> debunking the incomplete protein myth: They compared amino acid distributions in several different animal and plant foods and found that they\u2019re nearly identical. A recent study<\/a> even found that a vegan diet works just as well for muscle building as does an omnivore diet.<\/p>\n Oppezzo notes a few other protein myths, namely that you can\u2019t absorb more than a certain amount of protein at once, so it needs to be evenly distributed throughout your daily meals. While you might find it easier to eat 25 grams of protein in three meals than 75 grams all at once, studies have shown<\/a> that there\u2019s no real difference in how your body metabolizes protein by doing so. For older adults, however, splitting the protein among multiple meals can help ensure they get enough protein because, as we get older, we may need more protein within a given meal to trigger muscle protein synthesis.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also not the case that you have to mainline protein immediately after strength training<\/a>, she said. It\u2019s true that there is a so-called anabolic window after exercise, a period when your muscles are repairing themselves and can more easily incorporate protein from your diet. But that window is around 24 hours<\/a>, so just eat your normal meals for the rest of the day and don\u2019t worry about downing a post-workout protein shake at the gym.<\/p>\n And finally, eating more than the RDA can have its drawbacks \u2014 even if it\u2019s not coming from protein-packed potato chips or pastries.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t think a high-protein diet is necessarily bad, but what are you not eating?\u201d Oppezzo said. \u201cAre you missing out on the fiber, vitamins, phytochemicals and antioxidants that vegetables, fruits, whole grains and nuts provide?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Potato chips. Pastries. Bottled water. If you\u2019ve been to a grocery store recently, you\u2019ve probably noticed that even…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":682480,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[37],"tags":[210,50,1182,57005,57006,67,132,68],"class_list":["post-682479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-nutrition","tag-health","tag-news","tag-nutrition","tag-send-to-ucomms","tag-stanford-school-of-medicine","tag-united-states","tag-unitedstates","tag-us"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116293939183591436","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=682479"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682479\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/682480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=682479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=682479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=682479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"Untitled](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/oppezzo-long-gardner.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Legumes\"\/](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/protein-legumes.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n