![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/USATSI_25954844-e1752620005951.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThe Canadiens acquired Noah Dobson in a trade with the Islanders. (Russell LaBounty \/ Imagn Images)2. Montreal Canadiens<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +23<\/p>\n
In: Zack Bolduc, Noah Dobson
Out: Emil Heineman, Logan Mailloux, David Savard, Christian Dvorak, Joel Armia<\/p>\n
If you\u2019re a Canadiens fan, it\u2019s time to get excited. Only one team has improved more over the last summer externally and it\u2019s likely that few teams will improve more internally, given the collective age of Montreal\u2019s roster.<\/p>\n
That doesn\u2019t necessarily mean the Canadiens will improve over last year\u2019s finish, but it does mean they are far less likely to regress with significantly more substance behind their results.<\/p>\n
The big get is Noah Dobson, who has the potential to be Lane Hutson\u2019s Devon Toews. Dobson is a true top-pair defenseman, someone who adds tremendous upside to Montreal\u2019s back end with his puck-moving ability. He\u2019s a substantial get on his own, but the fact that it also means no more David Savard almost doubles the joy. Between the two, it\u2019s a 16-goal swing.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s a similar effect in giving up Emil Heineman for Dobson, and then trading for Zack Bolduc soon after. Heineman is a fine bottom-six player on the rise, but Bolduc showed he\u2019s already top-six caliber in his rookie season. What\u2019s exciting about Bolduc is his defensive game, a sorely missing element from Montreal\u2019s forward ranks beyond Nick Suzuki.<\/p>\n
If Montreal stood pat this summer, there was a good chance the team would take a step back after taking several steps forward last season. With Dobson and Bolduc in the fold, Montreal looks poised to build on last year\u2019s surprise playoff berth and prove they belong for the long haul.<\/p>\n
3. Anaheim Ducks<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +15<\/p>\n
In: Chris Kreider, Mikael Granlund, Ryan Poehling, Petr Mrazek
Out: Trevor Zegras, Isac Lundestrom, John Gibson<\/p>\n
The biggest addition for the Ducks is not one that the model is going to capture. It\u2019s the new guy behind the bench: Joel Quenneville. That\u2019s likely to be a significant tactical upgrade for the franchise, one that brings about numerous internal improvements.<\/p>\n
Beyond that, Anaheim has also fortified its forward group with two major additions and one intriguing trade. Chris Kreider and Mikael Granlund aren\u2019t young or without flaws, but they are both top-six caliber players who can bolster Anaheim\u2019s attack. Those additions give young centers Mason McTavish and Leo Carlsson some actual help to work with on the wing, enough for the Ducks to start digging out from the league\u2019s basement.<\/p>\n
As for Ryan Poehling, he may not possess the offensive flash that Trevor Zegras has, but he does bring the defensive substance the Ducks desperately need. He provides a big boost to Anaheim\u2019s bottom six.<\/p>\n
4. Carolina Hurricanes<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +9<\/p>\n
In: Nikolaj Ehlers, K\u2019Andre Miller
Out: Brent Burns, Dmitry Orlov<\/p>\n
At long last, the Hurricanes got their guy. There\u2019s no doubt that Nikolaj Ehlers will be a game-changer for the Hurricanes, the exact kind of dynamic offensive talent Carolina has needed for a while. Carolina may still be a 2C short, but the team\u2019s winger room is stacked.<\/p>\n
The back end is a bit trickier to evaluate, given K\u2019Andre Miller\u2019s last season. Miller took a step back along with the rest of the Rangers and doesn\u2019t currently grade out as a huge needle-mover relative to what the Hurricanes lost. The fit, though, is hard to ignore and it wouldn\u2019t be a shock to see Miller elevate to his best self in Carolina\u2019s system.<\/p>\n
With Alexander Nikishin ready to rock, Carolina\u2019s defense looks promising, even if on paper it arguably took a step back. It\u2019s up to the new guys to deliver, but regardless, the addition of Ehlers is huge. It\u2019s enough to make the Hurricanes one of the league\u2019s most improved teams this summer, which speaks volumes about a team that\u2019s coming off a trip to the conference finals.<\/p>\n
5. Vegas Golden Knights<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +9<\/p>\n
In: Mitch Marner, Colton Sissons, Jeremy Lauzon
Out: Nicolas Roy, Victor Olofsson, Alex Pietrangelo, Nicolas Hague, Ilya Samsonov<\/p>\n
No team added a better player this summer than Vegas, snagging a franchise star in Mitch Marner at a fair price. Marner completely changes Vegas\u2019 forward dynamic, adding an elite point producer with serious defensive chops at the top of the lineup. Adding Marner to a team that already features Jack Eichel, Mark Stone and William Karlsson is a serious luxury to Vegas\u2019 two-way ability.<\/p>\n
The Golden Knights are going to be a force next season thanks to one of the league\u2019s most stacked forward groups. Losing Nicolas Roy and Victor Olofsson isn\u2019t a big deal when the team has so much depth already and they\u2019re adding a top 15 forward to the mix on top of that.<\/p>\n
Adding Marner wasn\u2019t the only news of the summer, though. Vegas\u2019 standing took a hit when it was revealed that Alex Pietrangelo\u2019s playing days were likely over. While Pietrangelo may not be the player he once was, likely due to injury, he was still a very capable top-four option that brought stability to the back end. It\u2019s a hole that will be difficult to fill and while Kaedan Korczak is an extremely interesting internal option, Vegas\u2019 defense corps is still obviously worse without Pietrangelo around. He\u2019s a big loss that dampens the effect of adding a superstar.<\/p>\n
6. Seattle Kraken<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +9<\/p>\n
In: Mason Marchment, Frederick Gaudreau, Ryan Lindgren
Out: Andre Burakovsky, Michael Eyssimont<\/p>\n
Dumping Andre Burakovsky and adding Mason Marchment was tidy business for Seattle. Burakovsky had been floundering the last couple of years for the Kraken while Marchment looked like top-six caliber for the Stars \u2014 for $1 million less, too. Couple that with the veteran presence of Ryan Lindgren pushing Josh Mahura out of the lineup, and the Kraken look a bit more competitive going into next season.<\/p>\n
Whether that should\u2019ve been the plan, given the current league landscape and the prize waiting for the league\u2019s worst team at the end of this season, is an argument for another article.<\/p>\n
7. Buffalo Sabres<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +9<\/p>\n
In: Josh Doan, Justin Danforth, Michael Kesselring, Conor Timmins, Alex Lyon
Out: JJ Peterka, Sam Lafferty, Connor Clifton, Jacob Bernard-Docker<\/p>\n
There are a lot of folks who haven\u2019t been thrilled with Buffalo\u2019s offseason and that\u2019s understandable. For the third straight year, it feels like it\u2019s been time to push the chips in, spend some money and gun for a playoff spot. Instead, the Sabres made depth moves and shipped off a true top-six scorer without addressing the void afterward.<\/p>\n
It feels like a wasted opportunity, which probably makes Buffalo\u2019s placement here seem out of touch with reality.<\/p>\n
Maybe it is \u2014 betting on the Sabres has been a terrible idea for over a decade. But maybe this is the year Buffalo does turn the corner, thanks to internal jumps buoyed by cleaned-up depth.<\/p>\n
Josh Doan is not as good as JJ Peterka. That\u2019s a downgrade without question. But his underrated defensive game compared to Peterka\u2019s issues without the puck does mean the gap might not be as large as their point totals suggest. Add more Justin Danforth and less Beck Malenstyn on the fourth line and it\u2019s possible the Sabres can cover up the loss in the aggregate. There is arguably enough young, developing forward depth to sustain a Peterka-sized loss.<\/p>\n
The more important factor, though, is that the jump from Connor Clifton to Michael Kesselring is substantially larger than the drop from Peterka to Doan. Buffalo\u2019s defense corps was a major weakness last season, one that Kesselring\u2019s presence can help fix. He did well in a top-pair role when Utah ran into injuries last season, enough to believe he\u2019s a true top-four defenseman. Pair him with Owen Power and Buffalo\u2019s top four looks genuinely decent for the first time in a long time.<\/p>\n
The addition of Conor Timmins should help with things as well. He showed some promise in an elevated role with Pittsburgh, enough to believe he can form an actually good third pair with the defensively stout Mattias Samuelsson. Timmins isn\u2019t much, but he\u2019s probably a better option than what Buffalo was toiling with last year in the same role.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Defensive depth is something this team has been missing for a while. If everything goes according to plan after this offseason, it\u2019ll finally be a source of strength for Buffalo. And that could be what changes everything for this team. The Sabres have gone from one good pair led by Rasmus Dahlin to potentially three.<\/p>\n
8. Ottawa Senators<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +7<\/p>\n
In: Lars Eller, Jordan Spence
Out: Adam Gaudette, Travis Hamonic, Anton Forsberg<\/p>\n
One of Ottawa\u2019s biggest issues last season was a wretched third pair. No matter what combination of Tyler Kleven, Nikolas Matinpalo and Travis Hamonic was out there, things did not go well. The addition of Jordan Spence helps alleviate that. He\u2019s someone with a proven ability to crush sheltered minutes. Some may scoff at the idea of a third-pair powerhouse, but the Senators weren\u2019t getting anything close to what Spence can offer in the same role.<\/p>\n
Spence, based on his numbers after accounting for usage, looks like a player who has the potential to make a top-four jump. That\u2019s the best-case scenario, which would push Nick Jensen to a more appropriate role. If the worst case is that Spence can\u2019t (likely due to his smaller stature), but keeps crushing soft minutes, that\u2019s still a big win that has moved the needle considerably for the Senators.<\/p>\n
Ottawa may not have filled its biggest need (a top-line forward), but cleaning up the edges of the roster has put them on more stable playoff footing going into next season.<\/p>\n
9. Detroit Red Wings<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +6<\/p>\n
In: James van Riemsdyk, Mason Appleton, Jacob Bernard-Docker, John Gibson
Out: Vladimir Tarasenko, Tyler Motte, Jeff Petry, Alex Lyon, Petr Mrazek<\/p>\n
The Red Wings may have mostly operated around the edges, but the team looks better because of it, even if none of the players the team brought in look like they bring a lot to the table. James van Riemsdyk and Mason Appleton aren\u2019t anything special, but it beats playing someone such as Tyler Motte. Jacob Bernard-Docker doesn\u2019t look like much either, but if the alternative is Jeff Petry or Justin Holl, that\u2019s a small win for the Red Wings, too.<\/p>\n
The biggest change, though, is between the pipes. John Gibson\u2019s track record has been spotty of late, but he looked genuinely locked in last season and should provide a more stable presence over Alex Lyon.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s a patchwork job and the team still needs work overall to make the postseason, but the Red Wings do look incrementally more competitive.<\/p>\n
10. Tampa Bay Lightning<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +6<\/p>\n
In: Pontus Holmberg, Jakob Pelletier
Out: Luke Glendening, Nick Perbix<\/p>\n
Just how bad was Tampa Bay\u2019s depth last year? The simple addition of two slightly more competent bottom-six forwards, Pontus Holmberg and Jakob Pelletier, looks like a major contribution for a contending team. Holmberg, in particular, is a massive upgrade over Luke Glendening, whose Net Rating drifted below minus-10 last year, one of the worst marks in the league. With the Lightning\u2019s elite top six still in place, a couple of fixes at the bottom has them looking like one of the teams to beat this year.<\/p>\n
11. Boston Bruins<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +4<\/p>\n
In: Viktor Arvidsson, Tanner Jeannot, Sean Kuraly, Michael Eyssimont
Out: Cole Koepke, Parker Wotherspoon<\/p>\n
The Bruins look better for just one reason and that\u2019s the addition of Viktor Arvidsson. His presence as a top-nine level player helps push one of Boston\u2019s lesser options out of the lineup. The rest? They mostly just replace other similarly poor players at a much higher cost. Between Tanner Jeannot and Sean Kuraly, the Bruins are spending $5.25 million on two replacement-level players. If only there were a smarter way to spend $5.25 million \u2026<\/p>\n
12. New York Rangers<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +3<\/p>\n
In: Taylor Raddysh, Vladislav Gavrikov, Scott Morrow
Out: K\u2019Andre Miller, Chris Kreider<\/p>\n
At the very least, Vladislav Gavrikov looks like he can be a significant upgrade over K\u2019Andre Miller. Gavrikov was a true top-pair defenseman for the Kings last season and a defensive beast. He should look great on a pair with Adam Fox, or drive a matchup pair behind him \u2014 something Miller struggled to do last season.<\/p>\n
Still, it would\u2019ve been nice to add Gavrikov to a blue line that still had Miller rather than choose one over the other. The Rangers went from being short two top-four defensemen to being short two top-four defensemen. It\u2019s possible that Scott Morrow can step in and be that right away for them, but it doesn\u2019t feel like a likely bet in Year 1, considering how green he looked during the playoffs for Carolina.<\/p>\n
As for the forwards, things still look really thin. Taylor Raddysh is probably a fourth liner and the Rangers already have enough of those.<\/p>\n
13. Chicago Blackhawks<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +3<\/p>\n
In: Andre Burakovsky, Sam Lafferty
Out: Philipp Kurashev, Patrick Maroon, Alec Martinez, TJ Brodie<\/p>\n
It\u2019s probably not a good sign that one of the league\u2019s absolute worst teams only marginally improved compared to last season. Andre Burakovsky is not the top-six forward he once was and is probably only a minor upgrade over what was already here.<\/p>\n
A lot is riding on internal improvement for Chicago this year. With no reinforcements coming in, it\u2019s up to the youngsters to step up. Good luck.<\/p>\n
14. New Jersey Devils<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +2<\/p>\n
In: Connor Brown, Evgenii Dadonov
Out: Erik Haula, Curtis Lazar, Brian Dumoulin<\/p>\n
With Connor Brown and Evgenii Dadonov in the fold, New Jersey\u2019s bottom six is slightly better. Slightly. There\u2019s still a lot of work to do in order to make this team a contender, though. The Devils desperately need one more top-six forward to move up a tier.<\/p>\n
15. Philadelphia Flyers<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: +1<\/p>\n
In: Trevor Zegras, Christian Dvorak, Dan Vladar
Out: Ryan Poehling<\/p>\n
Sorry, but it was really funny to see the Flyers address their biggest problem, goaltending, with one of the worst options around. Hopefully, Dan Vladar can do well here, but his track record is rough.<\/p>\n
Trevor Zegras and Christian Dvorak are a lot more interesting. Zegras offers a potential offensive spark that\u2019s seriously missing among the team\u2019s forward group, while Dvorak should help replace some of the depth defense that was lost when the team dealt Ryan Poehling for Zegras.<\/p>\n
The Flyers probably won\u2019t be much better than last year, but the addition of Zegras is at least intriguing. The upside there is obvious \u2014 he just needs to make due on his promise.<\/p>\n
16. Minnesota Wild<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: 0<\/p>\n
In: Vladimir Tarasenko, Nico Sturm
Out: Gustav Nyquist, Frederick Gaudreau, Declan Chisholm<\/p>\n
The Wild spent the summer rearranging deck chairs. Vladimir Tarasenko and Nico Sturm are pretty close in impact to Gustav Nyquist and Frederick Gaudreau. The real wild card here will be how much value Zeev Buium can bring in from the jump. The Wild moved Declan Chisholm to make room for the rookie defender \u2014 will it pay off?<\/p>\n
17. Calgary Flames<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: 0<\/p>\n
In: Ivan Prosvetov
Out: Dan Vladar<\/p>\n
Does losing Anthony Mantha count? Probably not. In that case, we get one replacement-level goalie replacing another. Boring!<\/p>\n
18. Columbus Blue Jackets<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: 0<\/p>\n
In: Charlie Coyle, Miles Wood, Isac Lundestrom
Out: James van Riemsdyk, Sean Kuraly, Justin Danforth, Jordan Harris, Daniil Tarasov<\/p>\n
The Blue Jackets shuffled a few things around, mostly to end up in the same place. Miles Wood and Isac Lundestrom dragging things down is the primary culprit for that, though Wood adds some jam that could be helpful for a young team.<\/p>\n
At the very least, Charlie Coyle is a stabilizing piece down the middle for the team\u2019s top nine. He offers some positional flexibility as a utility player and was a decent get \u2014 even if the cost to acquire him felt high.<\/p>\n
19. Washington Capitals<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: 0<\/p>\n
In: Justin Sourdif
Out: Andrew Mangiapane, Lars Eller<\/p>\n
After having one of the strongest offseasons last year, the Capitals mostly moved around the edges this summer. The hope is that internal improvements from key young players will be able to replace what the team lost in Andrew Mangiapane and Lars Eller. Ryan Leonard and Hendrix Lapierre look like they can adequately fill those shoes.<\/p>\n
Newcomer Justin Sourdif is the wild card here, considering his lack of NHL experience (four games) and Washington\u2019s high acquisition cost. I don\u2019t currently have a projection for him, but it doesn\u2019t feel likely he will move the needle a considerable degree here.<\/p>\n
20. St. Louis Blues<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -1<\/p>\n
In: Pius Suter, Nick Bjugstad, Logan Mailloux
Out: Zack Bolduc, Radek Faksa, Nick Leddy, Ryan Suter<\/p>\n
St. Louis\u2019 placement here is not a product of what seems like a decent summer, but rather the lack of a projection for Logan Mailloux. The young defender played just seven chaotic games for Montreal last year and it wouldn\u2019t be fair to judge what he can do based on that data. In theory, he\u2019s the exact kind of defender the Blues need: one who can bring a lot of offense from the blue line.<\/p>\n
In practice, though, Mailloux is a giant question mark. Zack Bolduc isn\u2019t \u2014 he looks like a potentially strong top-six player with defensive upside. The difference there is what colors the Blues\u2019 placement here. If Mailloux can be as impactful as Bolduc already is, the Blues would shoot up considerably. That\u2019s still a big if at this juncture, but at the very least, it was probably a worthy bet considering St. Louis\u2019 surplus of winger talent. The presence of Jimmy Snuggerud for a full season should help offset the loss of Bolduc internally.<\/p>\n
Aside from that, it\u2019s easy to like what the Blues did nabbing Pius Suter and Nick Bjugstad. Those two considerably bolster the team\u2019s center depth, with the latter being a notable upgrade over Radek Faksa.<\/p>\n
21. Pittsburgh Penguins<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -1<\/p>\n
In: Anthony Mantha, Justin Brazeau, Matt Dumba, Parker Wotherspoon, Connor Clifton, Arturs Silovs
Out: Matt Grzelcyk, Conor Timmins, Vladislav Kolyachonok, Alex Nedeljkovic<\/p>\n
The problem with Pittsburgh\u2019s summer is that the Penguins have not become bad enough yet. If they want to be serious about Gavin McKenna, there\u2019s still a lot of work to get to Chicago and San Jose territory.<\/p>\n
The additions that Pittsburgh did make do look like decent lottery tickets, though. Anthony Mantha, if healthy, looks like a great bounce-back candidate while Justin Brazeau showed some nice promise two seasons ago. On defense, Parker Wotherspoon\u2019s underlying numbers suggest he has some upside while Matt Dumba has the name recognition to potentially get flipped for value at the deadline. The Penguins gave themselves a lot of future mid-round pick ammo here.<\/p>\n
Until Bryan Rust, Rickard Rakell or Erik Karlsson get moved, though, this has been a very mid summer. There\u2019s a lot of room to get worse.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Brent Burns brings borderline top-four value to the Avalanche. (Jared C. Tilton \/ Getty Images)22. Colorado Avalanche<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -2<\/p>\n
In: Brent Burns
Out: Jonathan Drouin, Charlie Coyle, Miles Wood, Ryan Lindgren<\/p>\n
It feels like many are underrating the Colorado Avalanche, at least if Gabriel Landeskog looks as good as he did during the playoffs. He could be the biggest difference between last year\u2019s team and this year\u2019s, helping to replace some of the void left by Mikko Rantanen. Retaining Brock Nelson is also underappreciated.<\/p>\n
In terms of who\u2019s in and who\u2019s out from this summer, though, the Avalanche did take a small step back. Jonathan Drouin and Charlie Coyle are notable losses from the top nine that will be felt; there\u2019s no denying that. But it does help that the Avalanche let Ryan Lindgren walk and signed Brent Burns instead. Even at his advanced age, Burns still has some game left and brings borderline top-four value to the Avalanche as a puck-mover. With the team\u2019s second pair being one of the biggest problems last year, Burns is a savvy addition that keeps Colorado in the contender\u2019s circle.<\/p>\n
23. Florida Panthers<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -2<\/p>\n
In: Jeff Petry, Daniil Tarasov
Out: Nate Schmidt, Vitek Vanecek<\/p>\n
The defending back-to-back champs are basically running it back. Be very afraid that the Panthers only lost two goals of value and were able to keep all three of their key free agents: Sam Bennett, Brad Marchand and Aaron Ekblad. Florida looked likely to be at the bottom of this list after the parade ended and management\u2019s ability to minimize the damage has been commendable.<\/p>\n
The only notable difference here is Jeff Petry in to take Nate Schmidt\u2019s role. It\u2019s a downgrade given what Schmidt was able to do for the Panthers last season, but a small one. Petry wasn\u2019t great in Detroit\u2019s top four, but should be adequate in a sheltered role.<\/p>\n
24. New York Islanders<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -2<\/p>\n
In: Jonathan Drouin, Maxim Shabanov, Emil Heineman, David Rittich
Out: Noah Dobson<\/p>\n
Noah Dobson \u2014 even if he\u2019s not exactly beloved by those on Long Island \u2014 is a big loss. While he\u2019s probably not as good as his 2023-24 breakout, he\u2019s probably also not as bad as he looked in 2024-25 (though the numbers don\u2019t exactly agree with that sentiment either). He\u2019s a top-pair defenseman and any team losing that is going to take a big hit. Until Matthew Schaefer arrives, the Islanders\u2019 defense corps is going to be a lot worse.<\/p>\n
What\u2019s going a bit unnoticed is that the team\u2019s forward group looks a lot better. Beyond a healthy Mathew Barzal, the addition of Jonathan Drouin looks like a nice bet given what he\u2019s shown in Colorado the last two seasons. It\u2019s possible he\u2019s completely a product of Nathan MacKinnon, but the reward is worth that risk if he\u2019s truly found his game as a top-six forward. Emil Heineman, while not a needle-mover, is a decent bottom-six improvement over a big drag like Kyle MacLean.<\/p>\n
The wild card is Maxim Shabanov, who signed with the Islanders after scoring 67 points in 65 games in the KHL. It\u2019s hard to know what Shabanov can do in the NHL given his size, but it\u2019s worth noting that Maxim Tsyplakov, whose KHL numbers were worse, ended up being a decent third liner. If Shabanov can mirror that, the Islanders\u2019 forward group looks a lot deeper than given credit for, even if it lacks high-end upside.<\/p>\n
25. Vancouver Canucks<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -2<\/p>\n
In: Evander Kane
Out: Pius Suter<\/p>\n
The trade is one-for-one and it\u2019s not a win for Vancouver. Evander Kane looks like a downgrade.<\/p>\n
Kane is probably better than his underlying numbers give him credit for and he was a noticeable force during the playoffs \u2026 aside from his penalty box parade, of course. He brings a different element to Vancouver\u2019s top six and should add some offensive pop. But it would\u2019ve been nice to see the Canucks retain Pius Suter on top of that. If it was either or, Vancouver made a questionable choice \u2014 especially when factoring for position.<\/p>\n
Without Suter, the Canucks remain thin up front and especially down the middle. His defensive presence will be seriously missed. Depending on Filip Chytil to stay available for an entire season is a huge gamble and the Canucks will be in trouble the minute he\u2019s out.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s not a disastrous offseason, but these being the only moves so far doesn\u2019t inspire much confidence.<\/p>\n
26. Dallas Stars<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -4<\/p>\n
In: Radek Faksa, Vladislav Kolyachonok
Out: Mikael Granlund, Evgenii Dadonov, Mason Marchment, Cody Ceci, Matt Dumba<\/p>\n
The Stars had one mission this offseason: fit under the cap. Dumping Mason Marchment and Matt Dumba fit the bill and what remains should still be a good team. There are internal solutions to both that minimize their losses, especially Dumba, whose game is closer to addition by subtraction territory. Vladislav Kolyachonok looks like a boilerplate third-pair guy, but even that feels like an upgrade on Dumba.<\/p>\n
For many, the big loss on paper is probably Mikael Granlund. The Stars are more than deep enough to survive his absence. His empty-calorie points probably won\u2019t be missed much \u2014 especially if someone such as Mavrik Bourque takes a big step.<\/p>\n
27. Nashville Predators<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -4<\/p>\n
In: Erik Haula, Nicolas Hague, Nick Perbix
Out: Colton Sissons, Jeremy Lauzon<\/p>\n
After \u201cwinning\u201d the offseason last year, the Predators decided to go in a different direction this summer. Erik Haula isn\u2019t much of an upgrade over Colton Sissons, and while Nicolas Hague holds some promise, he doesn\u2019t have the top-four experience that Jeremy Lauzon has. Nick Perbix also feels a little redundant to some of the lesser-known options the team already has, too. The end result is more of the same, but probably a little worse.<\/p>\n
28. Utah Mammoth<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -8<\/p>\n
In: JJ Peterka, Brandon Tanev, Nate Schmidt
Out: Matias Maccelli, Josh Doan, Nick Bjugstad, Michael Kesselring<\/p>\n
Of all the team placements on this list, Utah\u2019s might be the most perplexing. JJ Peterka was one of the biggest additions of the summer, but he\u2019s far from a perfect player and it did come at a depth cost.<\/p>\n
Peterka has a bit of defensive baggage that limits his overall value. The upside is there for him to be a star and make the trade a big win, but cleaning things up without the puck is a priority. Stylistically, he\u2019s a strong fit for a rush-oriented team, but Utah\u2019s depth has taken a hit in the process. Josh Doan looks like a capable top-nine player, while Michael Kesselring has proven he has top-four upside.<\/p>\n
In the grand scheme of things, it\u2019s always better to get the best player in the deal. But in this case, the Mammoth\u2019s depth options aren\u2019t strong enough to make up the difference. The loss of Matias Maccelli exacerbates that up front, while the addition of Nate Schmidt doesn\u2019t do enough to cover Kesselring\u2019s departure. Adding to that is a seemingly small swap with notable ramifications. Going from Nick Bjugstad to Brandon Tanev is a three-goal drop itself, considering Tanev\u2019s recent decline over the last two years.<\/p>\n
Utah\u2019s top six is stronger now and some internal growth should still put the Mammoth in the thick of the playoff race. But this team isn\u2019t as deep as it was at the start of the summer.<\/p>\n
29. Edmonton Oilers<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -8<\/p>\n
In: Andrew Mangiapane, Ike Howard, Curtis Lazar
Out: Evander Kane, Viktor Arvidsson, Connor Brown, Corey Perry, John Klingberg<\/p>\n
For the Oilers, everything hinges on their two rookies. They need one or both of Ike Howard and Matthew Savoie to be good from the jump.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s because a lot of their forward depth has been turned over this summer. Gone are Evander Kane, Viktor Arvidsson, Connor Brown and Corey Perry \u2014 all of whom looked like serviceable middle-six talents. In their place is only Andrew Mangiapane, who could have some upside in a bigger role, but is coming off a down year with the Capitals.<\/p>\n
The Oilers have lost a lot on paper. They\u2019re still an elite team, but how Edmonton responds internally \u2014 with the rookies as focal points \u2014 will dictate how far the Oilers can go next season.<\/p>\n
30. Winnipeg Jets<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -13<\/p>\n
In: Gustav Nyquist, Jonathan Toews, Tanner Pearson
Out: Nikolaj Ehlers, Mason Appleton, Brandon Tanev<\/p>\n
If it makes Jets fans feel any better, this is roughly where the Jets ended up on last year\u2019s list \u2014 mostly as a result of being unable to retain several key deadline additions. This time around, it\u2019s harder to see a silver lining, not after losing one of their most important forwards in Nikolaj Ehlers. He\u2019s a true top-six scorer, one whose absence will be felt heavily in the team\u2019s top six. Gustav Nyquist is far from an ideal stop-gap.<\/p>\n
On top of that, the Jets are betting heavily on hometown hero Jonathan Toews. It\u2019s a wonderful story for Manitobans, but it\u2019s fair to be skeptical about how much on-ice value Toews can actually provide, given his age, a significant absence from hockey and what he already was when he left. The best guess based on his previous trajectory is that Toews can be an OK 4C for the Jets this season. Winnipeg seems to be penciling him in as the team\u2019s 2C, an incredibly ambitious goal that Toews will likely have a hard time reaching.<\/p>\n
31. Toronto Maple Leafs<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -13<\/p>\n
In: Matias Maccelli, Nicolas Roy
Out: Mitch Marner<\/p>\n
There is a gigantic Mitch Marner-sized hole in the Leafs\u2019 forward group that remains unfilled. The Leafs badly needed a true top-six forward to fill that void, but didn\u2019t have a lot of options to do so. What they did to get Matias Maccelli and Nicolas Roy was savvy and has bolstered the team\u2019s forward depth, but it obviously doesn\u2019t come anywhere close to equaling the value Marner brings.<\/p>\n
Without Marner and without an adequate top-six forward replacement, the Leafs enter the 2025-26 season a lot worse on paper. They\u2019re still a quality playoff team, but they\u2019ve fallen outside the contending tier. Toronto is now arguably closer to the Ottawa and Montreal tier of the Atlantic than it is to the Florida and Tampa Bay tier.<\/p>\n
32. Los Angeles Kings<\/b><\/p>\n
Net Rating added: -18<\/p>\n
In: Corey Perry, Joel Armia, Cody Ceci, Brian Dumoulin, Anton Forsberg
Out: Tanner Jeannot, Vladislav Gavrikov, Jordan Spence, David Rittich<\/p>\n
You\u2019ve heard of addition by subtraction? Well, the Kings pulled off the rare feat of subtraction by addition. On defense, the team turned Vladislav Gavrikov, an actual top-pair defenseman, into Cody Ceci and Brian Dumoulin, two low-end third-pair defensemen \u2014 at best. They also parted ways with Jordan Spence, an undersized defender who looked promising in a sheltered role last year.<\/p>\n
The series of decisions is among the strangest in recent memory, where the team ended up paying the exact same amount of money ($8.5 million total) to downgrade their blue line by 18 goals.<\/p>\n
It is possible that The System is all that matters in Los Angeles, that both Ceci and Dumoulin will be better than they look because of it and vice versa for the departed. Given the age and track record of the two new guys coming in, consider me highly skeptical of the bet the Kings made here \u2014 one where they saved zero dollars and got a lot worse in the process.<\/p>\n
(Top photos of Nikolaj Ehlers and Mitch Marner: Harry How and Claus Andersen \/ Getty Images)\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The summer calm has arrived, the time of the offseason where player movement slows to a crawl and…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":69692,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[3115,3103,1720,3113,3107,291,2995,3110,1320,2993,2997,3000,1323,2081,3112,3104,3111,2994,1301,1302,293,3105,3108,1334,1328,2999,62,2996,3106,1304,67,132,68,2082,3114,3116,3109,292],"class_list":{"0":"post-69691","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-nhl","8":"tag-anaheim-ducks","9":"tag-boston-bruins","10":"tag-buffalo-sabres","11":"tag-calgary-flames","12":"tag-carolina-hurricanes","13":"tag-chicago-blackhawks","14":"tag-colorado-avalanche","15":"tag-columbus-blue-jackets","16":"tag-dallas-stars","17":"tag-detroit-red-wings","18":"tag-edmonton-oilers","19":"tag-fantasy-hockey","20":"tag-florida-panthers","21":"tag-los-angeles-kings","22":"tag-minnesota-wild","23":"tag-montreal-canadiens","24":"tag-nashville-predators","25":"tag-new-jersey-devils","26":"tag-new-york-islanders","27":"tag-new-york-rangers","28":"tag-nhl","29":"tag-ottawa-senators","30":"tag-philadelphia-flyers","31":"tag-pittsburgh-penguins","32":"tag-san-jose-sharks","33":"tag-seattle-kraken","34":"tag-sports","35":"tag-st-louis-blues","36":"tag-tampa-bay-lightning","37":"tag-toronto-maple-leafs","38":"tag-united-states","39":"tag-unitedstates","40":"tag-us","41":"tag-utah-mammoth","42":"tag-vancouver-canucks","43":"tag-vegas-golden-knights","44":"tag-washington-capitals","45":"tag-winnipeg-jets"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":"Validation failed: Text character limit of 500 exceeded"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69691"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69691\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}