{"id":70379,"date":"2025-07-17T16:52:08","date_gmt":"2025-07-17T16:52:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/70379\/"},"modified":"2025-07-17T16:52:08","modified_gmt":"2025-07-17T16:52:08","slug":"cha-lawyers-used-chatgpt-to-cite-nonexistent-court-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/70379\/","title":{"rendered":"CHA lawyers used ChatGPT to cite nonexistent court case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lawyers hired by the Chicago Housing Authority recently cited Illinois Supreme Court case Mack v. Anderson in an effort to persuade a judge to reconsider a jury\u2019s $24 million verdict against the agency in a case involving the alleged poisoning of two children by lead paint in CHA-owned property. <\/p>\n<p>The problem? <\/p>\n<p>The case doesn\u2019t exist. <\/p>\n<p>In the latest headache for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/06\/28\/brandon-johnson-chicago-housing-authority-ceo\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">CHA<\/a>, law firm Goldberg Segalla used artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, in a post-trial motion and neglected to check its work, court records show. A jury <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/01\/16\/cha-lead-paint-trial-verdict\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">decided in January<\/a>, after a roughly seven-week trial, that CHA must pay more than $24 million to two residents who sued on behalf of their children, finding the agency responsible for the children\u2019s injuries, including past and future damages. <\/p>\n<p>The firm apologized for the error in a June 18 court filing, calling it a \u201cserious lapse in professionalism.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cAn exhaustive investigation revealed that one attorney, in direct violation of Goldberg Segalla\u2019s AI use policy, used AI technology and failed to verify the AI citation before including the case and surrounding sentence describing its fictitious holding,\u201d said Goldberg Segalla\u2019s lead counsel in the case, Larry Mason, in the filing. <\/p>\n<p>Mason, whom the judge admonished for shouting during closing arguments in January, noted that \u201cseveral contributors\u201d supported him while preparing the motion. He also said in the filing that the investigation found \u201cno intent to deceive the Court\u201d and no other attorneys at the firm were aware of the improper citation. <\/p>\n<p>Goldberg Segalla has since implemented \u201cfirm-wide measures to re-educate its attorneys\u201d on its AI use policy, the filing said, and \u201cestablished preventative measures.\u201d The firm requested that the court not punish CHA for the attorney\u2019s mistake.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In response to a list of Tribune questions, CHA provided a copy of a letter that its interim Chief Legal Officer Elizabeth Silas sent Wednesday to Mason and said Goldberg Segalla has taken \u201call responsibility\u201d in this matter. <\/p>\n<p>In the letter, Silas thanked Mason for bringing the AI issue to the agency\u2019s attention and for apologizing for the error. <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyautosizes lazyload\" alt=\"Goldberg Segalla's lead counsel Larry Mason exits the courtroom at Daley Center, July 17, 2025, after a special meeting to discuss his firm's improper use of AI. (Eileen T. Meslar\/Chicago Tribune)\" width=\"5795\" height=\"615\" data- src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/CTC-L-CHA-attorneys-AI-lead-03_231460804.jpg\" data-attachment-id=\"25237229\" \/>Goldberg Segalla&#8217;s lead counsel Larry Mason, center, exits the courtroom at the Daley Center, July 17, 2025, after a hearing to discuss his firm&#8217;s improper use of AI in a lead paint case involving the CHA. (Eileen T. Meslar\/Chicago Tribune)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs you know, CHA expects its outside counsel to hold themselves to the highest responsible and ethical standards,\u201d Silas said. \u201cWe sincerely hope that the Court recognizes this unfortunate error and recognizes Goldberg Segalla\u2019s good faith actions to investigate, accept responsibility, and take proper corrective action. Please note, however, that depending on the Court\u2019s finding and rulings, CHA may consider and reserves the right to take additional appropriate action to protect its interests.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>CHA, the third largest public housing authority in the country, serves more than 65,000 households and is the largest single owner of rental housing in the city with more than 21,000 public housing units. <\/p>\n<p>The housing authority is without a permanent leader, with Board Chair Angela Hurlock serving as interim CEO. Mayor Brandon Johnson is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/06\/28\/brandon-johnson-chicago-housing-authority-ceo\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">nearing the final stages<\/a> of a search for a new chief executive, with mayoral ally Ald. Walter Burnett, 27th, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/07\/09\/ald-walter-burnett-stepping-down-cha\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a frontrunner<\/a> for the role. <\/p>\n<p>Cook County Circuit Court Judge Thomas Cushing called a special hearing Thursday for a further explanation \u2014 as CHA\u2019s counsel offered to provide when admitting to the error \u2014 on the matter. He required any attorneys responsible for the mistake to be present and for Goldberg Segalla to provide the court with copies of the firm\u2019s policies on the use of AI by attorneys.<\/p>\n<p>At the hearing, Danielle Malaty, the attorney responsible for the mistake, told the judge she did not think ChatGPT could create fictitious legal citations and did not check to ensure the case was legitimate. Three other Goldberg Segalla attorneys then reviewed the draft motion \u2014 including Mason, who served as the final reviewer \u2014 as well as CHA\u2019s in-house counsel, before it was filed with the court. Malaty was terminated from Goldberg Segalla, where she had been a partner, following her use of AI. The firm, at the time, had an AI policy that banned its use.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyautosizes lazyload\" alt=\"Danielle Malaty, left, former Goldberg Segalla lawyer, who was terminated following her use of ChatGPT to cite a fictitious court case, outside the courtroom with her attorney at Daley Center, July 17, 2025, after a special meeting to discuss Goldberg Segalla's improper use of AI in a case involving the alleged poisoning of two children by lead paint in CHA-owned property. \" width=\"3071\" height=\"615\" data- src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/CTC-L-CHA-attorneys-AI-lead-05_231460786.jpg\" data-attachment-id=\"25237132\" \/>Danielle Malaty, center, a former Goldberg Segalla lawyer who was terminated following her use of ChatGPT to cite a fictitious court case, talks with her lawyer outside the courtroom at the Daley Center, July 17, 2025. (Eileen T. Meslar\/Chicago Tribune)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI find all of this very unfortunate,\u201d Malaty said in the hearing, who has since started her own practice. \u201cAt no point did I have any intent to deceive the court.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mason told the judge that because of his repeated losses when arguing before the court during the trial, he was \u201cvery hands off\u201d with the post-trial motion because the case \u201cneeded a fresh perspective away from me.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mason said he was not expected to check all 58 cases cited in the motion and is \u201cpersonally disgusted\u201d and \u201cembarrassed\u201d by what happened, calling the mistake \u201chorrific.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mason declined to comment to the Tribune. Malaty declined to comment through her attorney but said in court that she had engaged in about 70 hours of training related to the use of AI and other ethical issues since making the error.<\/p>\n<p>Matthew Sims, an attorney for the plaintiffs, in the hearing asked for permission to file a motion for sanctions against Goldberg Segalla and CHA based on the \u201cfraud upon the court.\u201d The judge granted his request and said it must be filed by July 22.<\/p>\n<p>The next hearing for post-trial motion arguments is scheduled for July 31. CHA continues to contest the ruling and is seeking a verdict in its favor, a new trial on liability or a new trial on damages or to lower the verdict.<\/p>\n<p>Goldberg Segalla has billed CHA more than $389,900 for legal services, invoices dated between March 2024 through December 2024 show.  CHA confirmed to the Tribune that it will not be billed for any time or expenses related to this issue, including the Thursday hearing. <\/p>\n<p>The case, filed in January 2022, focused on Shanna Jordan, the mother of Jah\u2019mir Collins, now 10, and Morgan Collins, the mother of Amiah Collins, now 6, who sued CHA, The Habitat Co., East Lake Management Group and Environmental Design International, alleging that the defendants knew their unit had lead-based paint and that their children suffered \u201csevere lead poisoning\u201d while living in the unit. The unit was owned by CHA and is located at 7715 N. Marshfield Ave. in Rogers Park. <\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit said that CHA had known the property had lead-based paint since 1992 and faced code violations by the city in the early 2000s because of the hazard. <\/p>\n<p>Property management companies, The Habitat Co. and East Lake Management Group, who had managed the residents\u2019 CHA-owned property, were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/01\/16\/cha-lead-paint-trial-verdict\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">found<\/a> not liable for the children\u2019s injuries. The two companies did end up settling with the plaintiffs for much smaller amounts. <\/p>\n<p>Habitat then <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/03\/05\/habitat-cha-lead-poisoning-lawsuit\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">sued<\/a> the CHA and two of its attorneys in February for an alleged breach of contract and legal malpractice over the agency\u2019s handling of the lead poisoning lawsuit. A few months prior to the January ruling, Habitat had <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2024\/09\/27\/the-habitat-co-moves-to-end-its-property-management-for-cha-leaving-3400-units-of-public-housing-in-flux\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">terminated<\/a> all of its management agreements with the CHA, which accounted for 16 buildings and approximately 3,400 units of public housing. <\/p>\n<p>Environmental Design International conducted an inspection for lead-based paint in 2017 on behalf of CHA and found lead-based paint, the suit said. Environmental Design International settled with the plaintiffs prior to the trial. <\/p>\n<p>This was not the first time CHA <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2017\/04\/08\/kids-poisoned-by-lead-in-cha-housing-landlords-still-got-paid\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">approved housing<\/a> for residents who then were later diagnosed with lead poisoning. Dozens of children were found to have been poisoned by brain-damaging lead while living in homes and apartments declared safe by the Chicago Housing Authority, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2017\/04\/08\/kids-poisoned-by-lead-in-cha-housing-landlords-still-got-paid\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a Tribune investigation found in 2017<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The housing authority <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/05\/21\/chicago-housing-authority-new-environment-hire\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">created a new division<\/a> in April focused on environmental concerns and hazards for residents. The division\u2019s staff will start by focusing on lead-based paint hazards as they build out the new program. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/2025\/07\/17\/chicago-housing-authority-lawyers-chatgpt\/mailto:ekane@chicagotribune.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">ekane@chicagotribune.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Originally Published: July 17, 2025 at 11:42 AM CDT<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Lawyers hired by the Chicago Housing Authority recently cited Illinois Supreme Court case Mack v. Anderson in an&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":70380,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5124],"tags":[64,960,5404,5386,1818,1370,728,50,80,4329],"class_list":{"0":"post-70379","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-chicago","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-chicago","10":"tag-cook-county","11":"tag-il","12":"tag-illinois","13":"tag-latest-headlines","14":"tag-local-news","15":"tag-news","16":"tag-politics","17":"tag-real-estate"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114869616688446557","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70379\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/70380"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}