{"id":741506,"date":"2026-04-20T20:24:19","date_gmt":"2026-04-20T20:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/741506\/"},"modified":"2026-04-20T20:24:19","modified_gmt":"2026-04-20T20:24:19","slug":"california-releases-evidence-of-alleged-amazon-price-fixing-scheme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/741506\/","title":{"rendered":"California releases evidence of alleged Amazon price-fixing scheme"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Amazon wanted to sell Levi\u2019s Easy Khaki Classic pants for $29.99, but Walmart had lowered the price, and the giant online retailer had matched it at $25.47 to $26.99. <\/p>\n<p> But Amazon wasn\u2019t happy. It subsequently contacted Levi Strauss,  asking the San Francisco apparel company to convince Walmart to raise its price, according to a document filed Monday in a price-fixing case brought against Amazon by  California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta.<\/p>\n<p>Not only did Walmart raise its price, but a Levi Strauss employee also emailed Amazon, \u201cI\u2019m really hoping we can show this as a proof case so we can resolve issues going forward,\u201d according to the filing.<\/p>\n<p>The exchange over the pricing of the khaki pants is just one example of about a dozen cited in the document, filed in support of a preliminary injunction Bonta is seeking against Amazon to stop alleged price fixing.<\/p>\n<p>Bonta\u2019s office argues that Amazon, which is the largest online retailer in the U.S. and recorded <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/ir.aboutamazon.com\/news-release\/news-release-details\/2026\/Amazon-com-Announces-Fourth-Quarter-Results\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">$717 billion in global sales<\/a> last year, is leveraging its market power to inflate retail prices on its and competing sites.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAmazon has strong-armed vendors into raising prices elsewhere or pulling products from competing retailers altogether so that Amazon can protect its profit margins,\u201d Bonta said Monday at a news conference announcing the filing. \u201cThis takes money out of the pockets of California families every single day on everyday goods, ranging from diapers to clothing to furniture.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Bonta filed the <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/story\/2022-09-14\/california-launches-suit-against-amazon-alleging-anticompetitive-contracts-with-retailers\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">lawsuit in 2022 <\/a> in San Francisco Superior Court. The preliminary injunction is being sought in advance of a trial set for January. A hearing on the request is set for July 23.<\/p>\n<p>Amazon said in a statement Monday that the legal motion is a \u201ctransparent attempt to distract from the weakness of its case, coming more than three years after filing its complaint and based on supposedly \u2018new\u2019 evidence it has had for years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAmazon is consistently identified as America\u2019s lowest-priced online retailer, and we\u2019re proud of the low prices customers find when shopping in our store. Amazon looks forward to responding in court at the appropriate time,\u201d the statement said.<\/p>\n<p>Walmart said in a statement:  \u201cWe do not comment on litigation in which we are not a party. We will always work hard on behalf of our customers to keep our prices low.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Levis Strauss did not immediately respond. <\/p>\n<p>The litigation is the latest lawsuit alleging that the Seattle-based retailer has engaged in price-fixing.<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Trade Commission, 18 states and Puerto Rico have accused the company of <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/story\/2023-09-26\/amazon-sued-by-ftc-and-17-states-over-allegations-it-inflates-online-prices-and-overcharges-sellers\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">abusing its market position<\/a> to inflate prices on other online retail platforms, overcharge sellers and stifle competition. The 2023 federal lawsuit filed in Seattle largely mirrored California\u2019s case.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit, which has yet to go to trial, seeks a permanent injunction that would prohibit Amazon from engaging in unlawful conduct and loosen its \u201cmonopolistic control to restore competition.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Last year, Amazon <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/story\/2025-09-25\/amazon-to-pay-2-5-billion-in-prime-case\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">agreed to pay $2.5 billion<\/a> to settle another 2023 FTC lawsuit accusing it of duping people into automatically renewing Amazon Prime subscriptions through \u201cmanipulative, coercive, or deceptive user-interface designs,\u201d and making it complicated to end memberships.<\/p>\n<p>Under the settlement, one of the largest to come out of an FTC action, Amazon is paying up to $51 to eligible customers. <\/p>\n<p>The company did not admit wrongdoing and said the settlement \u201callows us to move forward and focus on innovating for customers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The 19-page document filed Monday in San Francisco Superior Court provided details about Amazon\u2019s alleged price-fixing scheme, largely derived from emails between Amazon and the vendors that sell products on its site.<\/p>\n<p>The exchange between Amazon and Levi Strauss was cited as one of three methods the online retailer has used to fix and raise prices. <\/p>\n<p>The alleged Levi Strauss scheme outlined in the document involved getting around price-matching pledges that result in a \u201cdownward pressure on price\u201d by either Amazon or the competitor agreeing, through the common vendor, to raise the price or make the product temporarily unavailable so that the price can increase.<\/p>\n<p>In another alleged scheme, Amazon  raised prices on price-matched items and asked its vendors to have competitors raise their prices.  In one instance, the lawsuit alleges, Amazon raised the prices on more than 10 pet treats sold on Chewy Pet Food &amp; Supplies, a publicly traded rival retailer.<\/p>\n<p>Chewy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p>The third alleged scheme involved a vendor, at Amazon\u2019s request, taking away products from a competing retailer that sold them for far less than Amazon. The lawsuit cites four products a furniture vendor agreed to stop providing to an undisclosed competitor because of its low prices.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the problematic retail[er] does not fix by the end of the week, we will discontinue [these products] from your problematic competition to ensure that Amazon can return to a healthy state with these items,\u201d the vendor emailed Amazon, according to the filing.<\/p>\n<p>Amazon had warned the furniture vendor that it would remove all four of its products from Amazon\u2019s website \u201c \u2018in the next few days\u2019 \u2014 immediately before the critical sales days of Black Friday and Cyber Monday \u2014 if the pricing issue was not resolved,\u201d according to the filing.<\/p>\n<p>Bonta said his office was \u201cfocusing on\u201d Amazon in its case and not the vendors and other retailers, which he said were setting prices they thought appropriate before Amazon\u2019s interference.<\/p>\n<p>In seeking the injunction, Bonta\u2019s office argues that Amazon threatens \u201cdire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, cowed by Amazon\u2019s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply,\u201d according to the filing. <\/p>\n<p>The injunction would bar Amazon from communicating with its vendors about the prices of its products on other online sites, among other prohibitions. Bonta  also is seeking a court-appointed monitor to oversee Amazon\u2019s practices, restitution for customers and damages when the case goes to trial.<\/p>\n<p>The attorney general\u2019s office had previously filed the evidence with the court in February, but the document was highly redacted from public view.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Amazon wanted to sell Levi\u2019s Easy Khaki Classic pants for $29.99, but Walmart had lowered the price, and&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":741507,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5123],"tags":[2431,37717,1582,276,6517,638,17286,305811,25175,43322,305809,2961,379,305810,224,5337,215251,19153,43855,27112],"class_list":["post-741506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-los-angeles","tag-amazon","tag-bonta","tag-ca","tag-california","tag-case","tag-company","tag-document","tag-eligible-customer","tag-evidence","tag-filing","tag-hike-price","tag-la","tag-lawsuit","tag-levi-strauss","tag-los-angeles","tag-losangeles","tag-price-fixing","tag-product","tag-request","tag-vendor"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116438910682745273","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=741506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741506\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/741507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=741506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=741506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=741506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}