{"id":768986,"date":"2026-05-02T21:09:22","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T21:09:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/768986\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T21:09:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T21:09:22","slug":"we-dont-hear-the-frogs-we-dont-see-the-birds-government-repeatedly-delayed-water-to-nsw-wetlands-documents-reveal-wetlands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/768986\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018We don\u2019t hear the frogs, we don\u2019t see the birds\u2019: government repeatedly delayed water to NSW wetlands, documents reveal | Wetlands"},"content":{"rendered":"

The New South Wales<\/a> government has routinely delayed environmental flows to critical wetlands in the state\u2019s north-west in favour of farming, despite admitting it could harm the breeding cycles of frogs and endangered birds and damage local ecosystems.<\/p>\n

Two weeks ago, scientists had to scramble to rescue turtles<\/a> after WaterNSW abruptly cut water flows to the internationally significant Gwydir region near Moree, after a complaint from a landowner.<\/p>\n

Now, a local grazier has released emails that reveal the state\u2019s environment and water department delayed the start of flows to parts of the region from spring until early summer to prioritise harvesting of winter cereal crops.<\/p>\n

A concerned bureaucrat wrote to landholders on 26 September, saying the \u201cideal time to deliver beneficial wetland flow is now\u201d partly due to \u201cwarm but mild conditions which with water would trigger wetland vegetation response and other species to breed such as frogs\u201d.<\/p>\n

A broad-shelled turtle that was dug out and saved from a bog in the Gwydir wetlands. Photograph: Supplied<\/p>\n

\u201cHowever, due to the 2025 winter cereal crop, an environmental water delivery will not occur until after they are harvested,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n

\u201cDelaying delivery is at the detriment of the environment and environmental water accounts.\u201d<\/p>\n

Environmental flows refer to water released by the government from dams and tributaries into rivers and ecosystems to restore their health.<\/p>\n

The broader Gwydir wetlands region supports four Ramsar-listed sites and encompasses floodplains including the Gingham \u2013 where the turtles were rescued \u2013 the Mallowa, and the Lower Gwydir watercourses. Wildlife<\/a> in the area relies on rain and floods, as well as environmental flows managed by state and federal governments in support of the Murray-Darling Basin plan.<\/p>\n

Emails show environmental flows to several areas did not start until November or early December. In one instance, the Lower Gwydir, they began in October but at a reduced rate.<\/p>\n

Further correspondence reveals the NSW environment and water department also held back flows in 2024, to wait for dryland farming operations on the floodplains to finish their winter cereal harvest. In the Mallowa they did the same in 2023.<\/p>\n

Grazier Jonathon Guyer manages wetlands for conservation in the Mallowa watercourse. The property has been in his family\u2019s hands for generations. Earlier this month, he spoke about how the cessation of flows by WaterNSW<\/a> had caused endangered birds such as the Australasian bittern to flee the wetlands and led to the deaths of fledging waterbirds, frogs and sheep.<\/p>\n

But he said he was even more concerned by the \u201crepeated pattern over multiple years of Mallowa environmental water being delayed, shortened, reduced or timed around winter crop harvest and farming activity\u201d by the environment and water department.<\/p>\n

Guyer said he had consistently asked the department to explain what analysis or ecological assessment the decision-making was based on and had not been given answers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe deeper issue is that Mallowa environmental water has, for years, been treated as something to fit around farming activity rather than something delivered according to ecological need,\u201d he told the Guardian.<\/p>\n

Guyer said when the wetlands had the water they needed, they were alive with plants, birds and insects, and the sound of frogs would keep him awake at night.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a good awake, because you can understand that the wetlands outside are healthy and happy, and it\u2019s what it\u2019s meant to be,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Jonathon Guyer with the remains of a sheep he had to euthanise in March after WaterNSW stopped environmental flows to Gwydir wetlands. Photograph: Jasmin Morrison\/The Guardian<\/p>\n

\u201cBut if there\u2019s a winter crop that hasn\u2019t been harvested, then according to the government departments that are in charge of our environmental goals, they just let slide and we lose it.<\/p>\n

\u201cSo we don\u2019t hear the frogs, we don\u2019t see the birds.<\/p>\n

\u201cHow many more of these years do we actually have left before there is nothing left and all this work that we\u2019ve done over the last 50 years across a couple of generations is just gone?\u201d<\/p>\n

The correspondence released by Guyer shows the NSW environment and water department is conscious of the ecological consequences of delaying water.<\/p>\n

In a 9 October 2025 email to landholders in the Gwydir region, the department wrote that good August and September rain had triggered a \u201csignificant environmental response\u201d including growth of many wetland vegetation species.<\/p>\n

An official wrote: \u201cfrogs are breeding and need surface water to complete this reproductive event\u201d, migratory birds had been spotted in higher than usual numbers and \u201cother waterbirds have been detected in breeding effort attempts, including a record of five threatened Australasian bittern and two threatened black-neck stork juveniles\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf the watercourse dried back significantly, the outcome of the naturally triggered environmental response at an individual, species and community level will be diminished. A later delivery or flow event will result in many species seasonal activities needing to start again, if they are able or capable,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n

In 26 September emails to landholders, the department wrote that delaying delivery of flows also came at greater cost to the environmental water accounts because commencing flows at the hottest time of year \u201crequires higher volumes to achieve the same area inundated compared to cooler times\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cYear after year observation of flows in the same or very similar timing and with similar volumes will result in less diversity in vegetation species and the habitats available to support animals,\u201d an official wrote.<\/p>\n

A 24 February 2025 email to landowners outlined similar concerns over the 2024-25 summer, with the department noting that a later start to flows due to cropping and a smaller window in which to deliver water were affecting the ability to achieve \u201cexpected or desired outcomes\u201d.<\/p>\n

An environment and water department spokesperson said flows were managed in consultation with the community and experts via environmental water advisory groups.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis may mean that on some occasions, environmental water flow delivery has been adjusted to accommodate considerations such as land management activities, including farming,\u201d they said.<\/p>\n

A report released last week by the federal inspector general of water compliance<\/a>, Troy Grant, found the NSW government had not secured any of the additional land access it had promised to improve flows in the Gwydir under a northern basin agreement made eight years ago with the federal government.<\/p>\n

Jonathon Guyer manages wetlands for conservation on his property. Photograph: Jasmin Morrison\/The Guardian<\/p>\n

The NSW Greens water spokesperson, Cate Faehrmann, has been asking the government questions about the circumstances that led to the flows stopping in March.<\/p>\n

She said the latest revelations about environmental flow delays raised questions and called on the government to \u201cassure the public that they understand their obligations under multiple water-related laws and treaties to prioritise the environment and protect significant ecological assets like the Ramsar-listed Gwydir wetlands\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was furious when I saw the impact that delaying the delivery of environmental water is having on the wetlands and the thousands of waterbirds and other animals that rely upon healthy wetland ecosystems to survive,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fact that this was a deliberate decision by the NSW government agency tasked with water management raises serious questions about the extent of influence that irrigators still wield upon the government of the day.\u201d<\/p>\n

The department\u2019s spokesperson said \u201cthe established operating practices of delivering environmental water flows is a separate matter from what is currently occurring in the Gwydir Valley\u201d.<\/p>\n

Do you know more? Email lisa.cox@theguardian.com<\/strong><\/p>\n

Quick GuideContact us about this storyShow\"\"<\/p>\n

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.<\/p>\n

If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.<\/p>\n

Secure Messaging in the Guardian app<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.<\/p>\n

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS<\/a>\/Android<\/a>) and go to the menu. Select \u2018Secure Messaging\u2019. <\/p>\n

SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Finally, our guide at theguardian.com\/tips<\/a>\u00a0lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Illustration: Guardian Design \/ Rich Cousins<\/p>\n

Thank you for your feedback.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The New South Wales government has routinely delayed environmental flows to critical wetlands in the state\u2019s north-west in…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":768987,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[746,159,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-768986","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-environment","9":"tag-science","10":"tag-united-states","11":"tag-unitedstates","12":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116507034818859475","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/768986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=768986"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/768986\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/768987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=768986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=768986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=768986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}