UK set to shed 163,000 jobs amid Iran war fallout<\/p>\n
Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy.<\/strong><\/p>\n The economic woes caused by the Iran war are expected to cost the British economy jobs this year.<\/p>\n With no sign of an end to the conflict, the latest regional outlook from the Item Club <\/strong>shows the UK economy is expected to shed 163,000 jobs this year.<\/p>\n It warns that lower income regions \u2013 such as South Wales and the Humber \u2013 will be hit hardest by the economic shock from the Middle East.<\/p>\n Both areas are heavily reliant on manufacturing and construction industries, which are suffering from higher energy costs and supply disruption.<\/p>\n Item<\/strong> Club, <\/strong>an economic forecasting group, predicts 5,700 jobs will be lost in South Wales, and 2,800 in the Humber over the year.<\/p>\n But the economic damage from the energy shock will run wider \u2013 as households across the country cut back on discretionary spending in the face of a surge in the cost of living.<\/p>\n That will hit the retail and hospitality sectors, with Item Club predicting that employment in London will drop by 25,000 this year as its retail and hospitality sector slows, with a 12,500 reduction in Birmingham, 9,800 drop in Leeds and 6,200 decline in Glasgow.<\/p>\n Tim Lyne, economic adviser to the Item<\/strong> Club<\/strong>, says:<\/p>\n double quotation mark\u201cSome of the lowest income regions will feel the biggest effects of the manufacturing and construction sectors reducing headcount in the face of rising energy prices and supply chain disruption.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile consumers in these areas typically have less rainy-day savings, which will reduce spending in the retail and hospitality sectors.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n This forecast of rising unemployment will not lift the government\u2019s spirits, with Keir Starmer facing a fight for his political life today after last week\u2019s local election results.<\/p>\n The agendaShare<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a002.37 EDT<\/p>\n Key events<\/p>\n Show key events only<\/p>\n Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature<\/p>\n The possibility of a new, more left-wing British prime minister and chancellor, and fears over the Iran war, are both pushing up UK borrowing costs today, argues Neil Wilson, <\/strong>investor strategist at Saxo UK.<\/strong><\/p>\n double quotation markAfter sliding for much of the latter part of last week gilt yields have jumped this morning on the political risk premia associated with a potential defenestration of Starmer and Reeves, but also due to the situation with Iran and oil price spike.<\/p>\n Fiscal loosening is not what the market wants to see at a time of existing pressures on finances, a fragile fiscal position, and higher borrowing costs due to the war. No fireworks yet but we could see some outsize moves should a leadership contest be triggered. Bond vigilantes are watching, waiting.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>UK government borrowing costs rise as pressure builds on Starmer<\/p>\n UK goverment borrowing costs have risen at the start of trading, lifted by inflation concerns and uncertainty over Keir Starmer\u2019s future.<\/strong><\/p>\n The yield, or interest rate, on UK 30-year bonds is up around six basis points (0.06 of a percentage point) at 5.63%.<\/p>\n The benchmark 10-year bond yield has also risen, up 5bps to 4.96%.<\/p>\n Yields rise when bond prices fall. These moves reverse the falls seen on Friday<\/a>, when Starmer<\/strong> pledged to stay on as prime minister despite the poor local election results.<\/p>\n Today, the PM is due to give a speech in which he\u2019ll promise to \u201cface up to the big challenges\u201d, but his position is looking more precarious after 40 Labour MPs called for him to set a date to step down, and Labour<\/a> backbencher Catherine<\/strong> West<\/strong> threatened too launch a \u201cstalking horse\u201d challenge if Starmer<\/strong> didn\u2019t set out a timetable to step down.<\/p>\n Investors may be anticipating that a change of leadership would result in higher government spending, and borrowing.<\/p>\n Michael Brown, <\/strong>senior research strategist at Pepperstone<\/strong>, explains:<\/p>\n double quotation markThe triggering of a leadership election, and a subsequent change in Prime Minister, leaves the GBP [the pound] and Gilts [UK government bonds] not only grappling with a ratcheting up of political uncertainty, but also being forced to face up to a likely more left-wing successor to Starmer.<\/p>\n Such an outcome would, in all likelihood, lead to a substantial loosening of the \u2018fiscal rules\u2019, along with considerably higher government spending, and even higher taxes, possibly even including a manifesto breach in raising NI, VAT, or income tax.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n But\u2026 the jump in the oil price is also a factor pushing up government bond yields, as it threatens to create higher inflation, making it harder for central banks to cut interest rates.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a003.25 EDT<\/p>\n China’s factory inflation hits 45-month high<\/p>\n The Iran oil shock has pushed Chinese factory inflation to its highest in nearly four years.<\/strong><\/p>\n China\u2019s producer price inflation has jumped to a 45-month high of 2.8% in April, up from just 0.5% in March, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS)<\/strong> data showed.<\/p>\n The NBS attributed higher factory-gate inflation to rising prices in sectors such as non-ferrous metals, oil and gas and tech equipment.<\/p>\n Consumer price inflation in China has also jumped, up to 1.2% in April from 1% in March.<\/p>\n Lynn Song<\/strong>, economist at ING,<\/strong> explains:<\/p>\n double quotation markThe impact of higher energy prices stemming from the Iran war was clear in the [consumer inflation] data. We saw a 17.4% YoY surge in energy for the transportation subcategory, which rose 11.5% month-on-month after a 10% spike in last month\u2019s data.<\/p>\n China\u2019s gasoline prices have risen by less than crude oil prices since the start of the Iran War, suggesting that there\u2019s still likely upside ahead for this subcategory if oil prices stay elevated. The impact of higher energy prices stemming from the Iran war was clear in the data. We saw a 17.4% YoY surge in energy for the transportation subcategory, which rose 11.5% month-on-month after a 10% spike in last month\u2019s data.<\/p>\n China\u2019s gasoline prices have risen by less than crude oil prices since the start of the Iran War, suggesting that there\u2019s still likely upside ahead for this subcategory if oil prices stay elevated.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>Pound slips against rising dollar<\/p>\n Sterling is making a poor start to the new trading week, dropping by half a cent against the US dollar.<\/strong><\/p>\n The pound has dropped to $1.358, wiping out most of Friday\u2019s gains. Traders are watching political tensions built in Westminster, as the uncertainty over Keir Starmer\u2019s future could weaken demand for UK assets.<\/p>\n But dollar strength is another factor this morning.<\/p>\n Tony Sycamore<\/strong>, analyst at IG<\/strong>, tells us:<\/p>\n double quotation markSome of that [the pound\u2019s weakness] is to do with the US dollar catching a bid on the reopen this morning on risk aversion flows after the Iranian response to the US peace plan.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>Heathrow’s April passenger numbers fall as Middle East conflict disrupts travel<\/p>\n The Iran war has hit passenger numbers at the UK\u2019s largest airport.<\/strong><\/p>\n Heathrow<\/strong> has reported this morning that passenger numbers in April fell 5% to 6.7 million, which it says reflects \u201cthe ongoing impact of the Middle East conflict on some markets and short-term adjustments to travel plans\u201d.<\/p>\n The airport is also planning to review its 2026 passenger forecast, and update it in June.<\/p>\n Heathrow <\/strong>CEO Thomas Woldbye <\/strong>says:<\/strong><\/p>\n double quotation mark\u201cWe know passengers want certainty when planning their hard-earned summer holidays, so we are supporting Government and airlines as they work through their plans to get passengers on their journeys.<\/p>\n While we have seen some short\u2011term disruption linked to the Middle East conflict, demand for travel remains strong with current fuel supplies stable. April was still our busiest month so far this year, underlining the strength of a global hub airport that can adapt quickly in times of uncertainty.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n On Item Club\u2019s forecast of falling employment this year, a UK government spokesman says:<\/strong><\/p>\n double quotation mark\u201cRecent figures show that there was an improvement in the labour market at the beginning of the year with unemployment falling below 5%, and 332,000 more people in work than a year ago.<\/p>\n \u201cBut we cannot escape the effects of the war in the Middle East which are likely to feed through to prices and employment in the coming months.<\/p>\n \u201cWe will do everything we can to support the country through this period, including by slashing energy bills by up to 25% for 10,000 manufacturers.<\/p>\n \u201cOur mission for clean power by 2030 will get us off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel prices, to cut bills for businesses and households for good.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>Oil jumps 4% as Trump brands Iran\u2019s response to peace plan \u2018totally unacceptable\u2019<\/p>\n The oil price has jumped 4% this morning as hopes of a breakthrough in the US-Iran peace talks falter.<\/strong><\/p>\n Brent crude, the international benchmark, is rallying after president Donald Trump said on Sunday that Iran\u2019s response to a US proposal was \u201cunacceptable\u201d.<\/p>\n The ongoing deadlock is fuelling supply fears as the Strait of Hormuz stayed largely closed.<\/p>\n Brent crude futures are up $4 or 3.95% this morning at $105.30 a barrel.<\/p>\n Mohit Kumar, <\/strong>economist at Jefferies, <\/strong>argues that we are still moving towards a deal, but both parties want to have an upper hand in negotiations, telling clients:<\/p>\n double quotation markBoth Trump and Iran rejected each other\u2019s proposals to end the war. Iran refused to dismantle its nuclear program, which has been the key demand from Trump. The Strait of Hormuz remains practically closed. Trump does want a deal, but he needs to show to his supporters that US managed to secure a deal on nuclear, which was the whole point of going into the war.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n