A dark pull<\/strong><\/p>\nDark matter is an invisible, hypothetical form of matter that, unlike normal everyday matter, has no interactions with the electromagnetic force. Dark matter can pass through light, magnetic fields, and any other form of energy along the electromagnetic spectrum without leaving a trace. The only evidence that dark matter exists is through its apparent interaction with one other force: gravity.\u00a0<\/p>\n
By observing how gravity bends around distant galaxies, astronomers have surmised that there must be an extra force, outside of the galaxies\u2019 own gravitational pull, to explain the bending fields, or \u201clensing.\u201d This extra force, physicists suspect, is dark matter, which could account for over 85 percent of the matter in the universe. But exactly what dark matter is is a matter of huge debate, with theories for dark matter particles that range widely in particle size and properties.\u00a0<\/p>\n
One class of proposed dark matter consists of \u201clight scalar\u201d particles, whose masses are many orders of magnitude lighter than an electron. Theorists predict that such dark matter should behave not just as particles, but also as coordinated waves when moving near black holes.<\/p>\n
When waves of dark matter come in contact with a rapidly spinning black hole, physicists predict that the black hole’s rotational energy can be transferred to the dark matter, amplifying it. This phenomenon, known as superradiance, would whip up the waves to extremely high densities of dark matter, akin to churning cream into butter.<\/p>\n
At high enough densities, light scalar dark matter, which is invisible by all other accounts, should leave an imprint on the gravitational waves that reverberate from the colliding black holes.\u00a0<\/p>\n
But exactly what would that imprint look like? And could such an imprint be detectable in gravitational waves that arrive on Earth, from black holes that merged many millions of light years away?\u00a0<\/p>\n
For answers to those questions,\u00a0Aurrekoetxea and his colleagues developed a model to predict the gravitational waveform, or the pattern of gravitational waves that two black holes would produce, if they collided in an environment of dark matter, versus in a vacuum (empty space, with no dark matter).\u00a0<\/p>\n
An imprint\u2019s prediction<\/strong><\/p>\nFor their new study, the team performed detailed numerical simulations to predict the gravitational wave that would be produced given various properties of two colliding black holes \u2014 a system known as a \u201cblack hole binary.\u201d They considered black hole binaries across a range of scenarios and properties, for example, varying the size and mass of each black hole, the environment of dark matter that the black holes might pass through, and the density of the dark matter that the black holes would spin up.\u00a0<\/p>\n
They designed the model to predict what a gravitational wave from a black hole binary would look like if it carried an imprint of dark matter, and furthermore, what that wave would look like if it traveled a given distance across space and time, to eventually arrive at a detector on Earth.<\/p>\n
With their model, they looked to see whether any gravitational-wave signals that have been detected on Earth match their predicted patterns of dark matter imprints. To do so, they applied the model to publicly-available data recorded by LVK over the observatories\u2019 first three observing runs. The observatories have picked up hundreds of gravitational-wave signals during this period. For their purposes, the researchers focused on the clearest signals, comprising gravitational waves from 28 separate events.\u00a0<\/p>\n
For each event, the team compared the pattern of the actual gravitational wave against their model of what the signal would look like if it were generated by the same event in an environment of dark matter. They also compared the gravitational wave to the more expected scenario in which the signal was produced in a vacuum.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Of the 28 clearest signals that they analyzed, 27 were solidly within the predictions for having been produced in a vacuum. However, the pattern of one event,\u00a0GW190728, showed a \u201cpreference,\u201d or an agreement with the team\u2019s dark matter model. In other words, the signal may carry an imprint of dark matter.\u00a0<\/p>\n
GW190728 is a gravitational wave that is named after the date that it was detected \u2014 on July 28, 2019. Scientists previously determined that the gravitational wave originated from a black hole binary with a total mass of about 20 times the mass of the sun. With their model, the team showed that such a system could have merged through a dense cloud of dark matter and produced a similar gravitational wave to GW190728.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cThe statistical significance of this is not high enough to claim a detection of dark matter, and further checks should be performed by independent groups,\u201d Aurrekoetxea says. \u201cWhat we think is important to highlight is that without waveform models like ours, we could be detecting black hole mergers in dark matter environments, but systematically classifying them as having occurred in vacuum.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWe now have the\u00a0potential to discover dark matter around black holes as the LVK detectors keep collecting data in the coming years,\u201d says co-author Soumen Roy, who led the data analysis part of the work. \u201cIt is an exciting time to search for new physics using gravitational waves.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cUsing black holes to look for dark matter would be fantastic,\u201d adds co-author Rodrigo Vicente, who developed the analytical model of the signal. \u201cWe would be able to probe dark matter at scales much smaller than ever before.\u201d<\/p>\n
This work was supported, in part, by the U.S. National Science Foundation and MIT\u2019s Center for Theoretical Physics \u2014 a Leinweber Institute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Dark matter is thought to make up most of the matter in the universe, but the only way…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":791288,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[323103,21744,22632,323102,271099,45484,323101,48357,492,219606,159,67,132,68,271098],"class_list":{"0":"post-791287","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-black-hole-binary","9":"tag-dark-matter","10":"tag-gravitational-waves","11":"tag-josu-aurrekoetxea","12":"tag-kagra","13":"tag-ligo","14":"tag-mit-center-for-theoretical-physics","15":"tag-mit-physics","16":"tag-physics","17":"tag-scalar-field","18":"tag-science","19":"tag-united-states","20":"tag-unitedstates","21":"tag-us","22":"tag-virgo"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116562183499826755","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=791287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791287\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/791288"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=791287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=791287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=791287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}