![](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/6f4d87531a78fa7cc5e2735619273d9553-IMG-3929.rsquare.w700.jpg\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\n The Frieze New York art fair is open through Sunday at the Shed.
\n Photo: David L\u00ea\n <\/p>\n
It\u2019s easy to be cynical about Frieze, the Ari Emanuel\u2013owned art fair ensconced in the Shed until Sunday, and think of it as a multilevel folly much like the nearby Vessel, a glittering skin around a hollow core. But while the casual visitor might be mystified by, say, the interactive De Beers diamond installation that sits next to a Turkish Airlines activation \u2014 there is a mock check-in counter with hostesses in uniform \u2014 to acknowledge the conspicuous cash on view without acknowledging the freedom that cash purchases is to miss the point.<\/p>\n
Frieze, the biggest of the four art fairs opening this week alongside TEFAF, Independent, and NADA, is a balancing act: \u201cBlue-chip slop,\u201d as one attendee described it to me, keeps the lights on for the bright-eyed gallerist presenting work that can and will and should sit in a museum one day. Admittedly, it is not always clear which is serving as a pretext for which.<\/p>\n
At the VIP preview on Wednesday, I was struck less by the ostentatious wealth than by the quiet conservatism of the goods on display: polite, retrograde abstracts; \u201cfun\u201d bursts of color on canvas designed to sit in a beach home; and the last gasps of Biden-era \u201cpolitical\u201d works. With the stunt-queen brinkmanship of the Venice Biennale happening at the same time and a creeping sense that the art market is not fully recovered, what is notable at Frieze is its \u201cdon\u2019t rock the boat or spook the collectors\u201d sensibility.<\/p>\n
\u201cA lot of galleries are just like, Oh, let\u2019s attach ourselves to this life raft of things that present as painterly and not just decorative but are still quite safe and sellable,\u201d says Jed Moch of Amity, an itinerant gallery that itself opened a show on Canal Street consisting mostly of works in pleasing washes of color. Even if he\u2019s wary of an aesthetic consensus set by interior decorators, Moch has to be cognizant of the current market, which is dominated by paintings that are \u201ca blending of figuration and abstraction that is delicate and very palatable.\u201d The smaller scale of his gallery offers some freedom from the market mandate.<\/p>\n
The semi-figurative, semi-abstract painting is, in fact, having a moment; that much was clear at Frieze. There is no avoiding the trends for social creatures like us. What, then, are galleries to do with a trend? If they simply reproduce it, they abdicate the taste-setting that is their raison d\u2019\u00eatre. If they defy it, they risk failing to sell (their other raison d\u2019\u00eatre). Frieze presents a unique optimization problem \u2014 how to cater to the existing tastes of buyers while advancing some idea of what contemporary art should look like.<\/p>\n
For David Zwirner, the answer has been to seize the opportunity with a solo presentation of Joe Bradley, the American painter who has long mined this vein of semi-figurative, semi-abstract painting. The Zwirner proposition seems to be this: We\u2019ve been here all along. \u201cJoe has been making this kind of work for 20 years. There\u2019s something powerful about presenting an artist who\u2019s been working in this idiom long before it became such a visible trend,\u201d says gallery director Thor Shannon.<\/p>\n
The Bradley paintings evoke the mid-century charm of the New York School, somewhere between Grace Hartigan\u2019s and Philip Guston\u2019s abstracts: Today\u2019s influencers are yesterday\u2019s influenced, in the great circle of painting. In the cacophony of the opening, the Bradley paintings do suggest the power of restraint (which is an odd thing to say about works that are too large to fit through the door of my apartment).<\/p>\n
In point of fact, David Zwirner could weather a Frieze of soft sales (though I think the Bradleys will do just fine) in a way others could not. So, too, could Gagosian, the megagallery that has six locations in New York alone (seven if you include the Gagosian Shop). Blue-chip galleries generate revenue elsewhere.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2ba084695b895bdaaf364f93df8c54ea89-frieze-art-alt.rhorizontal.w700.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n The Turkish Airlines activation at the Frieze lounge.
\n Photo: David L\u00ea\n <\/p>\n
Antwaun Sargent, who curated the booth (and is a self-described \u201cFrieze booth veteran\u201d), explained that this year\u2019s presentation is a dialogue between younger artists (the painter Derrick Adams, the fashion\/art photographer Tyler Mitchell) and 20th-century masters (Gerhard Richter, Helen Frankenthaler). Sargent describes the broader cultural moment as \u201csmall-c conservative,\u201d and tellingly, the Gagosian booth includes paintings of polite abstraction that won\u2019t have anyone clutching their pearls. Sargent, who became a director in 2021, should be trusted to know which way the winds are blowing \u2014 like Larry before him, he sells his shows. But he dismisses the idea that Frieze is simply a place to buy a painting to hang above the couch. \u201cThe truth is in the works,\u201d he says, and those truths are present no matter where they hang.<\/p>\n
For their part, small galleries (like Amity) keep the overhead low and compete where they can \u2014 on high-risk, more experimental works that they hope capture the attention of the globally itinerant collector class concentrated in town for a single week of satellite fairs and marquee auctions (Robert Mnuchin\u2019s collection at Sotheby\u2019s and S.I. Newhouse\u2019s at Christie\u2019s). As with so much in the current K-shaped economy, it is the midsize firms that are failing, as a spate of recent notable closings (Clearing, Blum, Marlborough, Venus Over Manhattan, Sperone Westwater) suggests.<\/p>\n
One newcomer to Frieze, the New York gallery Ulrik, is taking the plunge in the fair\u2019s emerging-gallery \u201cFocus\u201d section despite co-owner Alexander Fleming\u2019s reservations about \u201cthe capitalist logic to expand.\u201d For Fleming and co-owner Anya Komar, this is less a concern about art dealing as such and more a concern about the received \u201cwisdom\u201d that bigger is better in the gallery world. That idea drives up overhead. And no one wants to see a show organized around a sales quota.<\/p>\n
Still, Frieze has been a critical opportunity for Ulrik. The exposure that the fair has brought has already yielded tangible effects \u2014 more visitors, more inquiries even before the fair opened. When I visited the booth, it looked like a major museum would be acquiring a work. The duo are presenting works from the late Chelsea Hotel\u2013dwelling Bettina, the mononymic conceptual artist whose sharply observant photos and geometric sculptures disclose a maniacal, if paranoid, brilliance.<\/p>\n
Bettina has seen an enormous swell in interest that helps lower the risk of the gallery\u2019s investment in the fair. Her sculptures, developed by iterating the geometry of a lock\u2019s keyhole, insist on some conceptual depth despite their surface charm. They also allow the gallery to telegraph a more important message: We are playing in the big leagues, warding off competitors, and advancing a curatorial agenda that should be taken seriously.<\/p>\n
Related<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Frieze New York art fair is open through Sunday at the Shed. Photo: David L\u00ea It\u2019s easy…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":796472,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[5229,1037,149151,15080,324938,151702,64285,324939,179965,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-796471","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-art","10":"tag-david-zwirner","11":"tag-design-hunting","12":"tag-design-month","13":"tag-frieze-art-fair","14":"tag-frieze-new-york","15":"tag-frieze-ny","16":"tag-larry-gagosian","17":"tag-new-york","18":"tag-new-york-city","19":"tag-newyork","20":"tag-newyorkcity","21":"tag-ny","22":"tag-nyc","23":"tag-united-states","24":"tag-united-states-of-america","25":"tag-unitedstates","26":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","27":"tag-us","28":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116574519528681458","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/796471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=796471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/796471\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/796472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=796471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=796471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=796471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}