{"id":797226,"date":"2026-05-15T03:01:19","date_gmt":"2026-05-15T03:01:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/797226\/"},"modified":"2026-05-15T03:01:19","modified_gmt":"2026-05-15T03:01:19","slug":"hochuls-budget-to-bludgeon-even-more-new-yorkers-after-details-of-controversial-nyc-second-home-tax-revealed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/797226\/","title":{"rendered":"Hochul\u2019s budget to bludgeon even more New Yorkers after details of controversial NYC second-home tax revealed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>They\u2019re flooding the market.<\/p>\n<p>The trigger point for a controversial new tax on luxury second homes in New York City could be lowered from $5 million to $1 million of a property\u2019s assessed value \u2014 potentially squeezing even more homeowners.<\/p>\n<p>Gov. Kathy Hochul\u2019s office finally spilled details on her and Mayor Zohran Mamdani\u2019s envisioned pied-\u00e0-terre tax Thursday, revealing a convoluted two-phase plan that could ultimately lead to drastic changes to the city\u2019s unloved property tax system.<\/p>\n<p>The so-called \u201cpied-\u00e0-terre\u201d tax would apply to second homes in condos and co-ops with assessed values exceeding $1 million and one-to-three family homes assessed at over $5 million.<\/p>\n<p><img style=\"aspect-ratio:1.49926794;display:block\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-modal-image=\"39381176\" width=\"885\" height=\"590\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/new-york-gov-kathy-hochul-127745543.jpg\" alt=\"New York Governor Kathy Hochul speaking at the NYS Affordable Housing Conference.\" class=\"wp-image-39381176\"  \/>New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is doing a big u-turn from her January promise of no new taxes. James Keivom for NY Post<\/p>\n<p>The proposal \u2013 first reported by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/05\/14\/nyregion\/nyc-second-home-tax-rates.html?smid=tw-share\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">New York Times<\/a> \u2013 also blindsided state lawmakers with whom Hochul has been engaged with never-ending budget negotiations and whose approval is necessary for the tax plan.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis budget process is broken. It needs to be fixed,\u201d an exasperated state Sen. Leroy Comrie (D-Queens) said, griping that lawmakers learned the proposal from the media instead of the governor.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe should know these things. It shows a level of disrespect.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hochul\u2019s proposal is the latest concession to Democratic socialist mayor and his lefty followers engaged on a tax-hike crusade targeting the rich.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The pied-\u00e0-terre tax emerged as Mamdani\u2019s envisioned levy on the city\u2019s millionaires fizzled, in no small part because of Hochul\u2019s opposition.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The governor instead agreed to pursue the tax on luxury second homes, initially pitching it with Mamdani as targeting properties worth $5 million or more \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/05\/02\/nyregion\/second-home-tax-nyc.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">roughly 13,000<\/a> across the city, according to her office.<\/p>\n<p>The tax would bring in $500 million a year, Hochul and Mamdani argued \u2013 although that estimate was quickly disputed by city Comptroller Mark Levine, who found it\u2019d bring in <a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2026\/04\/14\/us-news\/hochul-proposes-taxes-on-second-homes-in-nyc-worth-5m-plus\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">closer to $340 to $380 million<\/a><strong>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Experts warned that putting the levy in place would be enormously complex, in large part because of New York City\u2019s byzantine property tax system and problems with even identifying what homes should be taxed.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The proposal circulated by Hochul\u2019s office represented a stab at a solution.<\/p>\n<p>Pied-\u00e0-terre properties based in one-, two- or three-family homes would still only have to pay the tax if the assessed market value of the property was over $5 million.<\/p>\n<p>Those valued between $5 million and $15 million would pay an 0.8% surcharge, under the proposal.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStart your day with all you need to know\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p class=\"inline-module__cta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tMorning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more.\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\tThanks for signing up!\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>The rate would increase to 1.05% for properties between $15 and $25 million, and 1.3% for those at the highest level.<\/p>\n<p>A part-time New York City resident\u2019s single-family home with a $11.5 million assessed value would pay a $92,000 surcharge, according to the proposal.<\/p>\n<p>But Hochul\u2019s newest proposal clamps down hard on condos and co-ops, fulfilling Mamdani\u2019s campaign pledge to go after \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2025\/06\/29\/us-news\/zohran-mamdani-doubles-down-on-plan-to-target-richer-and-whiter-neighborhoods\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">richer and whiter neighborhoods<\/a><strong>.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The scheme would initially hit those units with a \u201cmarket value\u201d \u2013 an arcane figure determined by the city\u2019s Department of Finance \u2013 of $1 million with the tax for the next two years, according to the proposal.<\/p>\n<p>Hochul\u2019s office is justifying lowering the threshold by suggesting that due to New York City\u2019s byzantine property tax assessment system, the assessed market value of a $1 million equates to a roughly $5 million sale price.<\/p>\n<p>Under the scheme pitched by Hochul, those properties with a market value between $1 and $3 million would pay a 4% surcharge.<\/p>\n<p>Properties at $5 million or more would be subject to a 6.5% surcharge, according to the governor\u2019s office.<\/p>\n<p><img style=\"aspect-ratio:0.89355469;display:block\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-modal-image=\"39381248\" width=\"527\" height=\"590\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2026-front-page-hochul-january-125750361.jpg\" alt=\"New York Post front page with headline &quot;NO NEW TAXES&quot; twice, showcasing a &quot;Flip-flopping governor cozies up to Zohran with $500M \u2018pied-\u00e0-terre\u2019 fee proposal.&quot;\" class=\"wp-image-39381248\"  \/> rfaraino<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor example, a condo selling for $18.5 million may have a (Department of Finance) assessed market value of only $1.1 million,\u201d the proposal states. \u201cIn the first two years, it would pay a surcharge of $45,115, or 4% of its current assessed market value.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After two years, the proposal optimistically envisions this method will be replaced by an entirely new system of valuing condos and co-ops properties that will lead to the surcharges being the same as family homes.<\/p>\n<p>The $18.5 million condo would ultimately pay $194,250 a year under the new assessment system, officials said.<\/p>\n<p>Hochul\u2019s office says the revised tax will impact 8,000 to 10,000 properties.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal came just hours after top legislators said a deal was still yet to be finalized on the pied-a-terre.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t have any final details. I have an idea of it, but I don\u2019t have the exact details,\u201d Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D-Bronx) told reporters Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>He said at the time that there was still even debate over whether the tax should be based on a property\u2019s assessed value or a trickier-to-determine market value.<\/p>\n<p>The tax likely will keep real estate lawyers busy contesting bills for clients hit by it, said Erik Zaratin, a partner Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere will be more property owners filing grievances,\u201d he said.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>James Whelan, president of the Real Estate Board of New York, blasted the proposal as adding more taxes on the most heavily taxed residents in the nation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOn the back of $500 million in a new second-home tax, putting even more costs on home buyers and sellers will further discourage transactions and threaten existing revenue collected by the State, City, and MTA,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-05-14\/ny-plans-new-tax-on-city-homes-over-1-million-bought-with-cash?taid=6a0610a376997b0001c3ee6e&amp;utm_campaign=trueanthem&amp;utm_content=business&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twitter\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Bloomberg<\/a> also was first to report Thursday that Hochul and legislators had agreed to another previously unrevealed tax \u2013 a surcharge on cash purchases of homes over $1 million.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"They\u2019re flooding the market. The trigger point for a controversial new tax on luxury second homes in New&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":797227,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[5229,5371,5248,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,618,67,586,132,5230,68,1154,2969,5301],"class_list":{"0":"post-797226","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-kathy-hochul","10":"tag-metro","11":"tag-new-york","12":"tag-new-york-city","13":"tag-newyork","14":"tag-newyorkcity","15":"tag-ny","16":"tag-nyc","17":"tag-taxes","18":"tag-united-states","19":"tag-united-states-of-america","20":"tag-unitedstates","21":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","22":"tag-us","23":"tag-us-news","24":"tag-usa","25":"tag-zohran-mamdani"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116576367386122015","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/797226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=797226"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/797226\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/797227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=797226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=797226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=797226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}