{"id":799382,"date":"2026-05-16T00:32:28","date_gmt":"2026-05-16T00:32:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/799382\/"},"modified":"2026-05-16T00:32:28","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T00:32:28","slug":"states-highest-court-asks-dallas-judge-to-explain-her-mask-rule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/799382\/","title":{"rendered":"State&#8217;s highest court asks Dallas judge to explain her mask rule"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img alt=\"A judge's gavel rests on a book of law. (Dreamstime\/TNS)\" loading=\"eager\" fetchpriority=\"high\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:16 \/ 9\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-gray200 mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>A judge&#8217;s gavel rests on a book of law. (Dreamstime\/TNS)<\/p>\n<p>Dreamstime\/TNS<\/p>\n<p>A Dallas County judge\u2019s continued insistence on masks in her courtroom alongside other COVID-19 protocols drew scrutiny this week from the state\u2019s highest court. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn-channels-pixel.ex.co\/events\/0012000001fxZm9AAE?integrationType=DEFAULT&amp;template=design%2Farticle%2Fplatypus_two_column.tpl\" alt=\"\" class=\"x1px y1px vh abs\" aria-hidden=\"true\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n<p>The health policy still posted on Judge D\u2019Metria Benson\u2019s website says that in addition to wearing masks, anyone entering her courtroom must alert court officials if they have various health conditions, including diarrhea. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>A lawyer complained in writing to a local administrative judge after a colleague was barred from Benson\u2019s court and threatened with jail by a bailiff after refusing to wear a mask. The complaint, reviewed by The Dallas Morning News, also notes that while others must wear a mask in court, the judge doesn\u2019t cover her face.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The allegations prompted a swift, skeptical response from Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice James\u00a0Blacklock, who wrote to Benson demanding she either explain what legal authority she had to impose those rules or inform him the allegations about the policy were false. The justice gave her until 5\u00a0p.m. Friday to respond.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf this is true, please carefully reconsider whether you have the legal authority for these actions,\u201d wrote Blacklock, a Republican.\u00a0\u201cI am aware of no legitimate basis on which a Texas judge may condition a person\u2019s presence in a courtroom on a mask requirement or on a heightened health screening.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Make Dallas News a preferred source so your search results prioritize writing by actual people, not AI.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/preferences\/source?q=dallasnews.com\" data-link=\"native\" role=\"button\" aria-label=\"Add Preferred Source\" class=\"td300 cp f aic jcc disabled:cd wsn px24 y40px px16 py8 buttonSm fs13 xs:fs16 xs:buttonLg bg-primaryAccessible hover:o80 c-white disabled:bg-gray300 disabled:c-gray600 border bn tac br2\"><\/p>\n<p>Add Preferred Source<\/p>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Benson\u2019s court coordinator said the judge would not comment on the matter. Friday morning, her courtroom was locked. A sign on the door said masks or face coverings were required for entry.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>Benson has presided over Dallas County Court at Law No. 1, a civil law court, since 2006. She was defeated in the March 3 Democratic primary by Erin Nowell, a former appellate court judge, but will continue to serve until the end of the year.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The written complaint about Benson\u2019s policies, first reported by The Texas Lawbook, was sent last week to Administrative Judge Ray Wheless, who presides over the region that includes Dallas County. It was sent by attorney Brian Hail on behalf of his client, Scott\u00a0Frenkel, also a lawyer.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Frenkel was among the attorneys involved in a February medical malpractice case before Benson when a bailiff denied him entry to the courtroom for refusing to wear a mask, Hail wrote in the complaint. Frenkel refused the order because he can\u2019t wear a covering over his nose and mouth for long, Hail said.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMr. Frenkel told the bailiff that the order was unlawful and that he would not put on a mask,\u201d Hail wrote. \u201cMr. Frenkel was given the choice of entering wearing a mask, leaving or continuing to argue and \u2018ending up on the 7th floor,\u2019\u201d Hail wrote. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>The 7th floor is where a jail holding area is located, the lawyer said, and is often used for people found in contempt of court.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo basically, mask up, get out or go to jail are the three options for her courtroom,\u201d Hail said during a phone interview with The News. \u201cI had heard that this issue has been raised before [with Benson] and has been ignored, but we\u2019re not going to let it be ignored anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hail&#8217;s complaint said one of Frenkel&#8217;s associates had to try the case without Frenkel in the courtroom.<\/p>\n<p>Wheless confirmed that the mask issue has been a persistent one with Benson. But he said he didn\u2019t learn until this week she was still mandating them.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI told her in December 2023, you\u2019re going to get in trouble with the commission,\u201d Wheless said, referring to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which investigates allegations of judicial misconduct. \u201cI told her you have no legal authority to do that.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Blake Hawthorne, clerk of the state Supreme Court, didn\u2019t respond Friday to multiple messages from The News as to whether Benson had sent a response by the deadline.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A judge&#8217;s gavel rests on a book of law. (Dreamstime\/TNS) Dreamstime\/TNS A Dallas County judge\u2019s continued insistence on&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":799383,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5135],"tags":[5229,1596,358,325183,325800,290169,3187,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-799382","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-dallas","8":"tag-america","9":"tag-dallas","10":"tag-texas","11":"tag-tp-courts","12":"tag-tp-covid-19","13":"tag-tp-dallas","14":"tag-tx","15":"tag-united-states","16":"tag-united-states-of-america","17":"tag-unitedstates","18":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","19":"tag-us","20":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116581443096908164","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/799382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=799382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/799382\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/799383"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=799382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=799382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=799382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}