{"id":802699,"date":"2026-05-17T11:09:15","date_gmt":"2026-05-17T11:09:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/802699\/"},"modified":"2026-05-17T11:09:15","modified_gmt":"2026-05-17T11:09:15","slug":"recipe-for-ecological-disaster-congress-writes-to-rajnath-singh-flagging-environmental-concerns-over-great-nicobar-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/802699\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Recipe for ecological disaster\u2019: Congress writes to Rajnath Singh flagging environmental concerns over Great Nicobar project"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <img src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/jairam-ramesh-rajnath-singh.jpg\" alt=\"\u2018Recipe for ecological disaster\u2019: Congress writes to Rajnath Singh flagging environmental concerns over Great Nicobar project\" decoding=\"async\" fetchpriority=\"high\"\/> NEW DELHI: Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Sunday wrote to defence minister <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/topic\/rajnath-singh\" styleobj=\"[object Object]\" class=\"\" commonstate=\"[object Object]\" frmappuse=\"1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Rajnath Singh<\/a> opposing the Great Nicobar Island Project, calling it a \u201crecipe for ecological disaster\u201d and urging the government to consider alternative defence infrastructure proposals with lower environmental costs.In his letter, Ramesh argued that while strengthening India\u2019s strategic and military capabilities was essential, the Great Nicobar project in its current form was being justified on \u201coverriding security considerations\u201d despite being \u201cessentially a commercial venture\u201d that could severely damage the region\u2019s fragile ecology and tribal rights.Sharing the letter on X, the Congress leader said, \u201cAfter writing to the Union minister of environment, forests, &amp; climate change and the Union minister of tribal affairs, I have written to the Raksha Mantri on the Great Nicobar Island Project.\u201dRamesh, a former environment minister, said the government had issued a press note titled \u2018The Great Nicobar Island Project: FAQs\u2019 on May 1. He claimed the document presented a \u201ccompletely false picture\u201d of the environmental clearance process and misrepresented compliance with provisions of the Forest Rights Act, 2006.\u201cOn May 10, 2026, I had written to the Union minister of wnvironment, forests and climate change on how these FAQs present a \u2018completely false picture\u2019 on the project&#8217;s environmental clearances which, in reality, have been given on very dubious grounds,\u201d he said.Referring to tribal rights concerns, Ramesh said he had also written to the Union Minister of Tribal Affairs on May 13, alleging that the project clearance process \u201cflagrantly violate, in letter and spirit, the individual and collective rights given to tribal communities by Parliament.\u201dIn his letter to the defence minister, he said, \u201cLet me straightaway say that there can be no two opinions on the need to strengthen our nation&#8217;s defences. There can also be no two opinions on the need to project India&#8217;s strategic capabilities in a credible manner.\u201dHowever, he suggested that India could strengthen its military presence in the region through existing facilities and infrastructure expansion projects that would cause comparatively less environmental damage.Ramesh pointed out that INS Baaz in Campbell Bay, commissioned in 2012, had plans pending for nearly five years to extend its runway and build a naval jetty. He argued these proposals would have \u201cfar less adverse environmental impacts\u201d.He also referred to existing assets under the Andaman and Nicobar Command, including INS Kardip, INS Kohassa, INS Utkrosh, INS Jarawa and the Car Nicobar Air Force Station, saying they could be expanded with significantly lower ecological costs.Questioning the strategic justification of the larger project, Ramesh said, \u201cThird, the transshipment port and the township that are an essential part of the Great Nicobar Island Project do not enhance our country&#8217;s military capability in any way. Yet, now that suddenly has emerged as a major justification for them.\u201d\u201cFinally, I wish to reiterate that the Great Nicobar Island Project in its present shape and form is a recipe for ecological disaster,\u201d he added.Jairam urged Singh to \u201cseriously consider the above alternatives\u201d which, he said, had also been proposed by distinguished naval officers in their writings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"NEW DELHI: Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Sunday wrote to defence minister Rajnath Singh opposing the Great Nicobar&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":802700,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[104,75754,746,326798,44281,4677,326796,1567,4674,4675,326797,80737,159,4676,68536,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-802699","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-breaking-news","9":"tag-ecological-disaster","10":"tag-environment","11":"tag-environmental-clearance-process","12":"tag-environmental-concerns","13":"tag-google-news","14":"tag-great-nicobar-island-project","15":"tag-india","16":"tag-india-news","17":"tag-india-news-today","18":"tag-jairam-ramesh","19":"tag-rajnath-singh","20":"tag-science","21":"tag-today-news","22":"tag-tribal-rights","23":"tag-united-states","24":"tag-unitedstates","25":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116589610044292719","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=802699"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802699\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/802700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=802699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=802699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=802699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}