{"id":803397,"date":"2026-05-17T18:29:24","date_gmt":"2026-05-17T18:29:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/803397\/"},"modified":"2026-05-17T18:29:24","modified_gmt":"2026-05-17T18:29:24","slug":"gothams-tyrannical-bike-kings-are-taking-over-the-city","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/803397\/","title":{"rendered":"Gotham’s tyrannical ‘bike kings’ are taking over the city"},"content":{"rendered":"

New York City is dealing with elevated crime and disorder, failing and emptying schools<\/a>,\u00a0taxpayer flight\u00a0and a fiscally crunched City Hall.<\/p>\n

But our ruling class is targeting\u00a0the \u201creal\u201d emergency: not enough bike lanes.<\/p>\n

Cycling activists and their friends at the Department of Transportation have stepped up their crusade against the existential threat of the four-wheeled vehicle, imposing street-redesign plans on neighborhoods<\/a>, whether residents want them or not.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s be clear. New Yorkers like bikes. Four wheels good, two wheels better.<\/p>\n

Bike lanes can be great assets, so long as they\u2019re not at the expense of pedestrians or drivers.<\/p>\n

Cyclists and pedestrians travel well together in places like the Hudson River Greenway right by the faster drivers on the West Side Highway.<\/p>\n

Reducing any of the lanes of the greenway or highway would upset a careful balance.<\/p>\n

But that balance is exactly what\u2019s missing across much of the city.<\/p>\n

DOT\u2019s \u201cbike kings\u201d have turned\u00a0street design<\/a>\u00a0into an ideological exercise, where the goal is not better mobility \u2014 but fewer cars, period.<\/p>\n

Park Avenue<\/a>. Canal Street. 72nd Street. Astoria\u2019s 31st Avenue. One by one, major arteries as well as side streets are set to be narrowed, rerouted or stripped of lanes under the cyclist creed.<\/p>\n

The bike kings go to communities with glossy presentations stuffed with buzzwords \u2014 \u201ctraffic-calming redesign,\u201d \u201crebalancing public space,\u201d \u201creimagined corridors.\u201d<\/p>\n

Translation: Your car, delivery truck or Access-A-Ride van\u00a0\u00a0\u2014\u00a0no longer welcome.<\/p>\n

Too often, \u201creimagining\u201d a street simply means strangling it.<\/p>\n

And if residents object? Dismiss them as backward, selfish or (worse) suburban-minded.<\/p>\n

On the\u00a0Upper West Side, hundreds of residents protested a proposed bike lane on 72nd Street, citing worse congestion, lost parking, delivery chaos and reduced access for seniors and the disabled.<\/p>\n

In\u00a0Astoria, firefighters pointed out that barriers and narrowed lanes<\/a> could slow emergency response as firetrucks have more trouble maneuvering and accessing curbs, hydrants and buildings.<\/p>\n

In both cases, the response was essentially the same: Proceed anyway.<\/p>\n

The policy appears no longer about trade-offs, but about doctrine.<\/p>\n

That anti-car doctrine ignores how New York actually functions.<\/p>\n

Most people still get around by foot, subway, bus or car. Businesses rely on trucks and vans. Families depend on pickups and drop-offs. Seniors depend on taxis, Access-A-Ride and ambulettes.<\/p>\n

In Chinatown, for example, Canal Street is not a lifestyle corridor \u2014 it\u2019s a vital commercial artery connecting Manhattan to Queens, Brooklyn and New Jersey.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\tGet opinions and commentary from our columnists\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSubscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter!\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\tThanks for signing up!\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Reduced lanes and access would destroy its fragile economy.<\/p>\n

Yet the area remains under study for lane reductions and redesigns that prioritize bikes over basic circulation and for further pedestrianization.<\/p>\n

Ask residents what they want, and it\u2019s removing illegal vendors \u2014 not welcoming more with expanded sidewalks.<\/p>\n

Local residents and business owners in nearby Bowery, Park Row and Chatham Square faced DOT presentations again last week for \u201cnew\u201d plans; the community rejected it, just as it did in\u00a02008.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yet proposals keep coming once every several years, as in Flushing and Queens\u00a0Chinatowns<\/a>\u00a0too.<\/p>\n

For older New Yorkers, this isn\u2019t abstract. Many live in what\u2019s known as Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities, such as Chinatown, Penn South and Fresh Meadows, where daily life depends on curb access.<\/p>\n

A 29-year-old urban planner may see curb space and parking lanes as \u201cunderutilized space.\u201d An 82-year-old with a walker needing a car for a doctor\u2019s visit sees it as independence.<\/p>\n

That senior can\u2019t \u201creclaim\u201d the street on a fixed-gear bike.<\/p>\n

Add to that high-speed e-bikes and scooters \u2014 often unregistered and difficult to track after accidents.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, businesses \u2014 already hit by inflation, e-commerce and congestion pricing \u2014 must take more hits: fewer loading zones, more traffic backups and a never-ending stream of parking tickets.<\/p>\n

All this for a heavily weather-dependent mode of transportation that, despite years of expansion, still represents a small share of total trips.<\/p>\n

None of this is an argument against bike lanes. It\u2019s an argument against absolutism.<\/p>\n

Streets exist first to move people and goods efficiently and safely. That means balancing competing needs, not just reducing cars.<\/p>\n

Instead, City Hall increasingly treats the removal of vehicle space as a good in itself.<\/p>\n

And the people pushing hardest for these changes are often the least affected by them \u2014 professionals who can work from home, avoid peak travel or simply absorb the inconvenience.<\/p>\n

Ironically, DOT is one of the top three agencies responsible for\u00a0misused city-issued\u00a0parking placards<\/a>. They want\u00a0you\u00a0to take the bus while\u00a0they\u00a0park wherever they want.<\/p>\n

New York doesn\u2019t need streets designed to conform to the cyclist ideology. It needs streets that make possible greater circulation, commerce and access.<\/p>\n

Residents should say no to senseless bike-lane expansion.<\/p>\n

Because a city that can\u2019t move and accommodate the people who actually live and work in it isn\u2019t \u201creimagined.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s just stuck.<\/p>\n

Wai Wah Chin is the founding president of the Chinese American Citizens Alliance Greater New York and an adjunct fellow of the Manhattan Institute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"New York City is dealing with elevated crime and disorder, failing and emptying schools,\u00a0taxpayer flight\u00a0and a fiscally crunched…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":803398,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5122],"tags":[44544,5229,5302,419,13239,79,405,403,5226,5225,5228,5227,1269,9366,18610,39006,6358,522,59802,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":{"0":"post-803397","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-bike-lanes","9":"tag-america","10":"tag-bikes","11":"tag-cars","12":"tag-city-hall","13":"tag-economy","14":"tag-new-york","15":"tag-new-york-city","16":"tag-newyork","17":"tag-newyorkcity","18":"tag-ny","19":"tag-nyc","20":"tag-opinion","21":"tag-pedestrians","22":"tag-roads","23":"tag-senior-citizens","24":"tag-seniors","25":"tag-transportation","26":"tag-trucks","27":"tag-united-states","28":"tag-united-states-of-america","29":"tag-unitedstates","30":"tag-unitedstatesofamerica","31":"tag-us","32":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116591340237678991","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/803397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=803397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/803397\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/803398"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=803397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=803397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=803397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}