On Monday morning, a nine-member jury unanimously rejected Elon Musk\u2019s $150 billion lawsuit against the artificial intelligence start-up OpenAI.<\/p>\n
After less than two hours of deliberation, the jurors decided that Mr. Musk had not sued in the time required by law. A judge then dismissed the tech mogul\u2019s suit against OpenAI, which he helped found as a nonprofit in 2015.<\/p>\n
After Mr. Musk left the A.I. research lab in 2018, his suit claimed, OpenAI\u2019s chief executive, Sam Altman, and its president, Greg Brockman, abandoned the nonprofit\u2019s mission by putting profits over the public good. The year Mr. Musk left, Mr. Altman attached a commercial company to the nonprofit and started raising billions of dollars from investors such as Microsoft. OpenAI is now valued at $730 billion and is expected to have an initial public offering, perhaps as soon as this year.<\/p>\n
But the only thing the jury truly decided was that Mr. Musk waited too long to file his suit. His claims were left on the table.<\/p>\n
Besides an important lesson on the perils of procrastination, here are five takeaways from the three-week trial.<\/p>\n
Elon Musk is still determined to bring down OpenAI.Mr. Musk entering the federal courthouse in Oakland, Calif., where the lawsuit was tried.Credit…Jason Henry for The New York Times<\/p>\n
After the jury\u2019s verdict, Mr. Musk\u2019s lawyers said he intended to appeal.<\/p>\n
Mr. Musk has long argued, both in court and out, that OpenAI endangered the future of humanity by abandoning its nonprofit mission. And his complaints about Mr. Altman and Mr. Brockman are deeply personal.<\/p>\n
Two days before the start of the trial, Mr. Musk sent a text message to Mr. Brockman, asking if he was interested in settling the case. When Mr. Brockman suggested that both sides drop their claims, Mr. Musk responded with a text attacking Mr. Brockman and Mr. Altman.<\/p>\n
\u201cBy the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America,\u201d he wrote, according to a document filed in the trial. \u201cIf you insist, so it will be.\u201d<\/p>\n
But Mr. Musk\u2019s case faced a high legal bar.<\/p>\n
When Mr. Musk filed his suit, many legal experts questioned its merits, and many doubted it would go to trial.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was surprised we got there,\u201d Dorothy Lund, a Columbia University law professor who specializes in corporate law. She said the case would not have made it to trial in Delaware (where OpenAI was incorporated), which typically takes a stricter approach to corporate law.<\/p>\n
On Monday, the jury\u2019s decision also showed that Mr. Musk faces a big problem with the statute of limitations, which was three years for this case. He began publicly complaining about OpenAI\u2019s behavior as early as 2020 but did not sue until 2024.<\/p>\n
Mr. Musk wants to control the race to A.I.<\/p>\n
Evidence presented in the trial showed that Mr. Musk had wanted to fold OpenAI into his electric car company, Tesla, in 2017 and 2018. He also poached an important researcher from OpenAI around that time and hoped to poach others.<\/p>\n
That could undermine his appeal of the verdict. OpenAI\u2019s lawyers have argued that Mr. Musk is complaining about OpenAI\u2019s transforming itself into a for-profit even though he wanted to do the same thing back in 2017.<\/p>\n
But his efforts to merge Tesla and OpenAI also show his enormous ambition in A.I. Though he has complained that OpenAI created a dangerous race to A.I., he very much wants to be a part of that race \u2014 and that has been true for a long time.<\/p>\n
He recently folded xAI, his artificial intelligence start-up, into SpaceX, his rocket ship company. SpaceX is preparing its own initial public offering on Wall Street, which could value the company at $1.5 trillion.<\/p>\n
Sam Altman has a credibility problem.The trustworthiness of Sam Altman, OpenAI\u2019s chief executive, was attacked by Mr. Musk\u2019s lawyers.Credit…Jason Henry for The New York Times<\/p>\n