{"id":836157,"date":"2026-06-01T05:38:21","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T05:38:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/836157\/"},"modified":"2026-06-01T05:38:21","modified_gmt":"2026-06-01T05:38:21","slug":"federal-transportation-board-pauses-proposed-rail-merger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/836157\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal transportation board pauses proposed rail merger"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"&quot;byline&quot;\">by Eric E. Garcia, Fort Worth Report <br \/>May 31, 2026<\/p>\n<p>The Surface Transportation Board is pausing a decision on an $85 billion merger between Union Pacific Railroad and Norfolk Southern Railway.<\/p>\n<p>The federal agency \u2014 which regulates the nation\u2019s railroads \u2014 announced its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stb.gov\/news-communications\/latest-news\/pr-26-13\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">unanimous decision<\/a> May 28 to allow both companies to submit more information, including the merger\u2019s potential effect on competitiveness, by July 27.<\/p>\n<p>Board officials said the railroads provided incomplete information when the application was first submitted and that a revised application didn\u2019t fix the problem.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The revision, submitted April 30, included an environmental review. Public comments about the application are considered in the completeness of the revised application, according to the agency.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe board finds that there are several aspects of the revised application that are unclear or underdeveloped,\u201d the agency said in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stb.gov\/news-communications\/latest-news\/pr-26-13\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">news release<\/a>. Additional information is required \u201cso that the board (can) thoroughly evaluate \u2014 and the public has an adequate opportunity to comment on \u2014 whether the transaction is in the public interest,\u201d the agency said in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stb.gov\/news-communications\/latest-news\/pr-26-13\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">news release<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The merger, if approved, would create a single-line railroad across the country, linking the East and West coasts.<\/p>\n<p>On May 18, Eric Gehringer, Union Pacific\u2019s executive vice president of operations, <a href=\"https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/2026\/05\/18\/up-norfolk-merger-decision-expected-in-2027-bnsf-other-industry-parties-continue-to-oppose\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">told attendees<\/a> of the 22nd Annual Southwestern Rail Conference that the federal agency was expected to make a decision on the proposed merger by early 2027.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Gehringer said the merger would not create a behemoth railroad company.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m not going to integrate the two railroads right away,\u201d he said at the Hurst event. \u201cWe\u2019ll have a plan, it will be well thought out. We\u2019ll have all of the changed management in place and we will make one adjustment after the next in line with safety, in line with service, in line with growth. We\u2019ll make sure those changes, as we make them, demonstrate the outcome that we expected. If we have to adjust, we\u2019ll adjust.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>If the merger is approved, Union Pacific plans to invest $2.1 billion in the following few years, including new technology to improve rail safety, he said.<\/p>\n<p>According to the <a href=\"https:\/\/stoptherailmerger.com\/coalition-launches\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Stop the Rail Merger Coalition<\/a>, composed of railroad operators, customers and workers, the merger could drive up costs for manufacturers, farmers and consumers while reducing competition.<\/p>\n<p>Fort Worth-based BNSF Railway, which is opposed to the merger, said it appreciates the action taken by the Surface Transportation Board to protect the integrity of the process and to ensure that stakeholders and the public have clarity about the proposed merger.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe board\u2019s determination that key elements of the revised application remain unclear or underdeveloped \u2014 including issues related to competition, shipper access, service assurance, market impacts, and downstream effects \u2014 highlights the significant gaps that still exist,\u201d BNSF officials said in a statement. \u201cHolding the proceeding and environmental review in abeyance until UP and NS provide this supplemental information underscores the seriousness of those deficiencies.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>BNSF officials said they would continue to oppose the merger because it could reduce competition, restrict access for shippers and undermine the efficiency of the country\u2019s rail network.<\/p>\n<p>Eric E. Garcia is senior business reporter at the Fort Worth Report. Contact him at <a href=\"https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/2026\/05\/31\/federal-transportation-board-pauses-proposed-rail-merger\/mailto:eric.garcia@fortworthreport.org\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">eric.garcia@fortworthreport.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>At the Report, news decisions are made independently of our board members and financial supporters. Read more about our editorial independence policy <a href=\"https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/about\/fort-worth-report-editorial-independence-policy\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>This &lt;a target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; href=&#8221;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/2026\/05\/31\/federal-transportation-board-pauses-proposed-rail-merger\/&#8221;&gt;article&lt;\/a&gt; first appeared on &lt;a target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; href=&#8221;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org&#8221;&gt;Fort Worth Report&lt;\/a&gt; and is republished here under a &lt;a target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; href=&#8221;https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nd\/4.0\/&#8221;&gt;Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License&lt;\/a&gt;.&lt;img src=&#8221;https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/fortworthreport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/cropped-favicon.png?resize=150%2C150&amp;amp;ssl=1&#8243; style=&#8221;width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;&#8221;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>&lt;img id=&#8221;republication-tracker-tool-source&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/?republication-pixel=true&amp;post=579622&amp;amp;ga4=2820184429&#8243; style=&#8221;width:1px;height:1px;&#8221;&gt;&lt;script&gt; PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: &#8220;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/2026\/05\/31\/federal-transportation-board-pauses-proposed-rail-merger\/&#8221;, urlref: window.location.href }); } } &lt;\/script&gt; &lt;script id=&#8221;parsely-cfg&#8221; src=&#8221;\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/fortworthreport.org\/p.js&#8221;&gt;&lt;\/script&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"by Eric E. Garcia, Fort Worth Report May 31, 2026 The Surface Transportation Board is pausing a decision&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":836158,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5138],"tags":[5229,83645,7371,7372,342767,102111,7375,358,3187,340948,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":["post-836157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-fort-worth","tag-america","tag-bnsf","tag-fort-worth","tag-fortworth","tag-proposed-merger","tag-railroads","tag-tarrant-county","tag-texas","tag-tx","tag-union-pacific-railroad","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-unitedstates","tag-unitedstatesofamerica","tag-us","tag-usa"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116673243124925761","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/836157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=836157"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/836157\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/836158"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=836157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=836157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=836157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}