{"id":842156,"date":"2026-06-03T19:53:45","date_gmt":"2026-06-03T19:53:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/842156\/"},"modified":"2026-06-03T19:53:45","modified_gmt":"2026-06-03T19:53:45","slug":"between-beaufort-and-beirut-israel-faces-narrowing-options-against-hezbollah","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/842156\/","title":{"rendered":"Between Beaufort and Beirut, Israel faces narrowing options against Hezbollah"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Monday evening, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once again<\/a> halted imminent military attack plans following intervention by US President Donald Trump.<\/p>\n

Earlier that day, the premier had issued orders for the IDF to strike key Hezbollah targets in Beirut\u2019s southern suburbs in response to relentless rocket and drone attacks against Israeli soldiers and civilians, declaring<\/a>: \u201cThere will be no situation in which Hezbollah attacks our cities and citizens while the terror headquarters in Dahiyeh remain off-limits.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hours later, after Tehran threatened<\/a> to bolt ceasefire negotiations with Washington over the planned strikes, insisting that a truce with the US apply to Lebanon as well, Trump called Netanyahu and shortly after announced that both Israel and Hezbollah had agreed to roll back the fighting, apparently renewing their near-defunct April truce.<\/p>\n

Israeli officials downplayed the severity of the exchange<\/a>, but Trump confirmed<\/a> Wednesday that he had called Netanyahu \u201cfucking crazy\u201d on the call, and US officials claimed he said, \u201cEverybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.\u201d<\/p>\n

The episode uncomfortably encapsulates Israel\u2019s predicament on its northern border. While the IDF has achieved significant battlefield gains over Hezbollah in recent years, the past weeks have shown how far it is from a long-term solution and how hemmed-in it is by diplomatic constraints.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tGet The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition
\n\t\t\tby email and never miss our top stories\n\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\tBy signing up, you agree to the terms<\/a><\/p>\n

With a full invasion posing a great military and diplomatic risk, expanded ground operations in the south unable to reach Hezbollah\u2019s core, Trump blocking strikes on Beirut, and the Lebanese government unwilling or unable to disarm the group, Israel is left with no easy options in Lebanon.<\/p>\n

The Hezbollah rebound<\/p>\n

For roughly 18 months following the ceasefire declared in November 2024, Israel operated in southern Lebanon with near-impunity. Hezbollah had been militarily devastated, with its former leader assassinated, supply lines from Iran damaged by the collapse of Assad\u2019s Syria, and its political standing significantly weakened. During that period \u2014 arguably the group\u2019s lowest point in decades \u2014 the IDF killed hundreds of Hezbollah operatives with nary a response.<\/p>\n

After Israel and the US launched their campaign against Iran in late February, however, it became brutally clear that Hezbollah had been down, but not out.<\/p>\n

\t\"\"
\n\t\tSmoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike in the southern Lebanese village of Choukine on May 17, 2026. (Abbas FAKIH \/ AFP)<\/p>\n

Since March 2, backing its patrons in Tehran, Hezbollah has fired some 5,500 rockets at IDF troops operating in southern Lebanon and around 2,500 at Israel, while launching around 300 drones at troops and civilians, according to the IDF. The early April ceasefire with Tehran appeared to embolden the group even further, producing the surge in drone attacks in recent weeks that led Netanyahu to vow<\/a> a more aggressive offensive.<\/p>\n

The attacks forced the head of the IDF Northern Command to acknowledge<\/a> that the military overestimated the damage done to Hezbollah\u2019s capabilities during the 2024 ground offensive. Israeli troops had thrust into southern Lebanon in order to push Hezbollah out of range for many of its projectiles to reach Israel, but the group has continued to harry the border area, just from deeper inside Lebanon<\/p>\n

The military believes Hezbollah still possesses thousands of short-range rockets and hundreds of longer-range projectiles, launching them primarily from north of the Litani River.<\/p>\n

The Iran dimension further compounds the problem. Tehran has insisted that a ceasefire with the US include a halt to attacks on Hezbollah and has threatened to bolt negotiations if Israel ramps up the campaign.<\/p>\n

As long as Trump remains invested in the Iran talks, an Israeli strike deep into Beirut or the Beqaa Valley \u2014 where the vast majority of Hezbollah\u2019s arsenal and fighters are concentrated \u2014 appears off the table.<\/p>\n

\t\"\"
\n\t\tIran\u2019s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi arrives for the opening of the BRICS Foreign Ministers\u2019 Meeting at the Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on May 14, 2026. (Arun SANKAR \/ AFP)<\/p>\n

If the preliminary deal being considered by Washington is signed, it would reportedly provide billions of dollars in economic relief to Iran in exchange for reopening the Strait of Hormuz and compliance with faith-building measures \u2014 money likely to flow to terror proxies like Hezbollah. Should talks collapse, Iran nonetheless has every incentive to keep Hezbollah active as leverage.<\/p>\n

Despite Israel\u2019s successes in containing Hezbollah, neither the campaign against Iran nor the ongoing operations in southern Lebanon \u2014 nor Jerusalem\u2019s ongoing direct talks with Beirut since April \u2014 have offered a clear path to a quiet northern border.<\/p>\n

Beaufort too close, Beirut too far<\/p>\n

With thousands of northern residents<\/a> facing frequent Hezbollah fire, official Israel continues to assert its military successes and vow greater action. But its latest strategies are either insufficient or have been effectively blocked by the White House.<\/p>\n

Asked by The Times of Israel to explain Israel\u2019s strategic thinking, a senior Israeli official on Monday pointed to military achievements in southern Lebanon, saying that since the April ceasefire, the IDF has eliminated 900 Hezbollah terrorists, destroyed weapons storage sites, headquarters, launchers, and underground infrastructure, and expanded operations across the Litani River into the Beaufort ridge and Saluki stream areas. \u201cThere will be no sanctuary for the terrorist proxies of the Iranian regime,\u201d the official declared.<\/p>\n

Netanyahu underscored that message on Sunday, standing before a picturesque IDF photograph of Beaufort Castle \u2014 the historic fortress overlooking southern Lebanon recently seized by the Givati Brigade \u2014 and declaring its capture \u201ca dramatic shift in the policy we are leading\u201d against Hezbollah.<\/p>\n

\t\"\"
\n\t\tPrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu makes a statement in front of an IDF photo of Beaufort Castle on May 31, 2026 (Screenshot \/ Omer Miron \/GPO)<\/p>\n

The IDF\u2019s return to the landmark, which it held from the 1982 First Lebanon War until its humiliating withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000, carried obvious symbolic weight.<\/p>\n

But the iconic fortress is also for many a potent reminder of the quagmire that was Israel\u2019s 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon, a past trauma that some fear the country is now repeating.<\/p>\n

Netanyahu recalled that the landmark site \u201cbecame a symbol of deep division within our society,\u201d but promised things had changed.<\/p>\n

\u201cToday, we have returned to Beaufort differently,\u201d he said. \u201cWe have returned united, determined, and stronger than ever.\u201d<\/p>\n

Indeed, 2026 is not 1982. While the 18-year security zone may have shielded the north from attack, at great human cost, experts note that today, controlling more of the south does not affect the ability of Israel\u2019s enemies in Lebanon to fire on the country from beyond the buffer zone.<\/p>\n

\t\"\"<\/a>
\n\t\tIDF troops operate in southern Lebanon, in a handout photo published on June 1, 2026. (Israel Defense Forces)<\/p>\n

\u201cBeyond the symbolic status of Beaufort, I don\u2019t think it has enormous [strategic] significance,\u201d said Moran Levanoni, a Lebanon expert at Israel\u2019s Institute for National Security Studies.<\/p>\n

A full-scale invasion targeting Hezbollah\u2019s core in Beirut and the Beqaa is the only military option that could actually disarm the terror group, he said.<\/p>\n

But Levanoni predicted that \u201cIsrael will not be able to withstand that,\u201d both due to diplomatic tensions with Trump and public fears of repeating the previous prolonged occupation, which cost hundreds of soldiers\u2019 lives and fueled the rise of Hezbollah.<\/p>\n

Diplomatic difficulties<\/p>\n

As narrow as the military options for confronting Hezbollah appear, there isn\u2019t yet a strong diplomatic alternative either.<\/p>\n

The senior Israeli official maintained that Jerusalem\u2019s negotiations with Beirut, hosted by Washington, remain aimed at disarming Hezbollah and reaching a peace agreement, and were made possible by battlefield damage Israel has already inflicted: \u201cOur accomplishments during the war, and the severe damage sustained by Hezbollah, have changed the balance of power in Lebanon and have created the conditions that made talks possible.\u201d<\/p>\n

\t\"\"
\n\t\tAmbassador to the US Yechiel Leiter (2nd left) attends a meeting between Israeli and Lebanese delegations hosted by the United States at the State Department in Washington, DC, on June 2, 2026. (Kent NISHIMURA \/ AFP)<\/p>\n

Many analysts have read Israel\u2019s push to expand its ground campaign as a means of pressuring the Lebanese government to follow through on its repeated, if so far hollow, commitment to disarm Hezbollah.<\/p>\n

Such pressure may be more effective given that the current government in Lebanon has been the most outspoken against Hezbollah and Iranian influence in decades, but it\u2019s unclear whether it or the Lebanese Armed Forces possesses the capabilities to act on its pledge.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor the first time, Lebanon truly understands that Hezbollah\u2019s weapons are what have brought it to the terrible situation it is currently in,\u201d Levanoni said, pointing to recent surveys \u2014 one aired on independent network Al Jadeed, another published by Janoubia, a Hezbollah-opposed outlet \u2014 showing broad Lebanese public support for reaching an agreement with Israel, not only among Christians but among Sunnis and Druze, and to a surprising degree even among Shiites.<\/p>\n

\t\"\"<\/a>
\n\t\tDisplaced people who fled Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon sit outside shelter tents in Beirut, April 24, 2026. (AP Photo\/Bilal Hussein)<\/p>\n

But a European diplomat familiar with the Lebanese leadership\u2019s thinking told The Times of Israel on Monday that it is unrealistic to expect Beirut to disarm Hezbollah by itself.<\/p>\n

\u201cEverybody knows it\u2019s a joke, but keeps repeating it as if they have the capability,\u201d they said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe see a lot of words and no action\u201d from the Lebanese government, said Hanin Ghaddar, a senior fellow at The Washington Institute. She explained that this is due to concerns of civil unrest and national security, as well as a fear among Lebanon\u2019s leadership of abandonment by international actors, as appeared to occur in 2008 when a US-backed coalition backed down after Hezbollah seized much of Beirut in response to efforts to curb its power.<\/p>\n

No easy options<\/p>\n

Neither a military nor a diplomatic solution to confronting Hezbollah appears imminent, though observers floated different models that could serve to eventually dismantle the group.<\/p>\n

\t\"\"
\n\t\tUS President Donald Trump arrives at the White House, May 22, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo\/Jose Luis Magana)<\/p>\n

Ghaddar argued that what is needed is a structured US-led framework of \u201ccarrots and sticks,\u201d such as increased military assistance, reconstruction support, and institutional backing if Lebanon acts, and tougher sanctions, reduced security assistance, and greater Israeli freedom of action if it does not. She compared the model to the Cedar Revolution of 2005, when mass Lebanese protests combined with coordinated US, French, and UN pressure forced Syria to withdraw its forces from Lebanon after nearly three decades.<\/p>\n

The European diplomat pointed to former president Rafiq Hariri\u2019s absorption of Lebanese militias in the 1990s and Algeria\u2019s demobilization of Islamist fighters in the 2000s as positive models. In that view, the goal would be to separate Hezbollah\u2019s hard-core loyalists from the larger mass of paid fighters by offering some alternative salaries, jobs, or roles in state structures, while isolating the group\u2019s financing and supply routes.<\/p>\n

As Israel and Lebanon held a fourth round of Washington talks on Tuesday, a senior Lebanese official told Reuters the discussions would explore \u201cpilot zones\u201d \u2014 specific geographic areas where hostilities would cease, Israeli troops would withdraw, and Lebanese soldiers would deploy, with the arrangement gradually extended across the country.<\/p>\n

Such a mechanism may be enough to keep the ceasefire from fully collapsing. But whether it leads anywhere near Hezbollah\u2019s disarmament is another question entirely, especially with the group vowing<\/a> not to back any proposal that stops short of a formal declaration compelling Israel to halt all military activity across Lebanon.<\/p>\n

If Israel remains set on a military track, it will likely need clear understandings with Trump on the scope of any major ground operation, how long it can last, what happens if Iran intervenes, and how the Lebanese and Iranian fronts can be decoupled.<\/p>\n

Without those understandings, it risks advancing militarily while remaining stuck strategically, essentially running in place as it hits Hezbollah without fully dismantling it, and pressuring a Beirut that appears unable to act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"On Monday evening, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once again halted imminent military attack plans following intervention by US…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":842157,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[2],"tags":[306516,306926,51259,372,343,344750,69,99,344751,50,130393],"class_list":["post-842156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","tag-2026-israel-hezbollah-conflict","tag-2026-us-israel-war-with-iran","tag-beirut","tag-benjamin-netanyahu","tag-buffer-zone","tag-ceasefires","tag-donald-trump","tag-israel","tag-lebanese-armed-forces","tag-news","tag-southern-lebanon"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116687931480303977","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/842156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=842156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/842156\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/842157"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=842156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=842156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=842156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}