{"id":867768,"date":"2026-06-15T00:21:27","date_gmt":"2026-06-15T00:21:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/867768\/"},"modified":"2026-06-15T00:21:27","modified_gmt":"2026-06-15T00:21:27","slug":"a-texas-immigration-lawyer-breaks-down-family-detention-habeas-corpus-and-senate-bill-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/867768\/","title":{"rendered":"A Texas immigration lawyer breaks down family detention, habeas corpus and Senate Bill 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

This article was originally published by the\u00a0Texas Observer<\/a>, a nonprofit investigative news outlet and magazine. Sign up for their\u00a0weekly newsletter<\/a>, or follow them on\u00a0Facebook<\/a>,\u00a0X<\/a>, and\u00a0Bluesky<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"ChildrenChildren walk between structures at the Dilley detention camp. Credit: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement \/ Charles Reed<\/p>\n

In the Trump administration\u2019s war on immigrants \u2014 adults and children alike \u2014 South Texas is a nexus.<\/p>\n

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have arrested 33,583 people in the San Antonio and Harlingen areas of responsibility between Trump\u2019s first day in office and March 10 of this year, according to the agency\u2019s data. In Minneapolis, three ICE agents<\/a> who shot people<\/a> have a Rio Grande Valley connection. The Department of Homeland Security plans to put hundreds of miles of buoys<\/a> in the Rio Grande, 17 of those miles being in the Valley, to allegedly stop people from attempting to cross. Texas\u2019 only licensed Hindi, Urdu, and Punjabi court interpreter was detained in Harlingen\u2019s airport in March,<\/a> which also happens to be where ICE flies many of its deportees<\/a> out of the United States.<\/p>\n

And the Dilley detention center, officially the Dilley Immigration Processing Center or previously the South Texas Family Residential Center, which sits about an hour southwest of San Antonio, was reopened by the Trump administration after ICE (during the Biden administration) had closed it in 2024. Liam Conejo Ramos and his father, infamously detained in Minneapolis, were sent to<\/a> and released from<\/a> there earlier this year.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Daniel Hatoum is a San Antonio-based senior supervising attorney for the Texas Civil Rights Project. The Texas Observer spoke with him in early June about family detention, how habeas corpus cases becamede facto immigration law, Senate Bill 4, and what mass deportation does to society.\u00a0<\/p>\n

TO: Dilley detention center has become a common name right now in the immigration news lexicon, but most people may not know what it is, besides its name and that <\/strong>Liam Ramos and his father were detained there<\/strong><\/a>. The Texas Civil Rights Project is part of an effort with the Texas Immigration Law Council called <\/strong>Operation Clear Out Dilley<\/strong><\/a>, which is an attempt to help release the 50 or so children in the facility. Can you describe who\u2019s held there, and under what legal authority? What does daily life look like?<\/strong><\/p>\n

It\u2019s a family detention facility, which means it\u2019s a facility where parents and their children are held together. These types of facilities have been used because the detention of children is a very fraught exercise. Children could face additional harms that adults may not be subject to when it comes to detention. During the Bush administration<\/a>, there was a concerted effort to try to detain families out of a fear that people might be coming over the border with children and using those children as a way to avoid detention.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The first big family detention center is actually still a detention center today: It\u2019s the Hutto Detention Facility in Taylor. There was a lot of litigation about that. The government did not do well in that litigation, and that facility ultimately had to stop detaining children.\u00a0<\/p>\n

During the Obama administration, what ended up happening is that they implemented family detention as well to try to detain folks, and they opened two facilities, the Karnes family detention facility was the first one, they also opened the Berks [County] facility in Pennsylvania, which is very small, then they needed an even bigger facility, and that\u2019s when Dilley was opened. That one holds the most amount of family detention beds that we\u2019ve seen.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a former natural gas camp that has all these trailers, so when you hear [Congressman] Joaquin Castro talk about it, I believe he refers to it as the \u201cDilley trailer prison.\u201d That\u2019s a pretty accurate description. \u2026 So, who\u2019s there? Well, it\u2019s parents and their children, but the age of the children doesn\u2019t exempt them from detention there. So, tender-age children can go to family detention centers. Children who are infants can be in a family detention center. There have been high-profile cases of babies that have gone to family detention centers. Our client in the \u201cMs. Z\u201d<\/a> case, which we took on last year, was a six-year-old with a history of leukemia.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Food is rotten in Dilley. There\u2019s no other way to put it. That\u2019s what\u2019s happening. I guess the only other way to put it is worm-filled, because it\u2019s often filled with worms. It\u2019s not child-appropriate. Remember, when you have children who are as old as 16 months, 18 months, they have very specific food needs, and we\u2019ve heard multiple reports from many folks in the detention facility that those needs were not met.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The other thing that\u2019s worth pointing out is that the American Academy of Pediatricians has indicated, since 1997, when the first big case about children\u2019s detention came out, that any time in detention for a child is extremely harmful. It causes children to suffer; it creates long-term developmental problems. \u2026 Family detention center has this feedback [loop] where parents are put in a position of helplessness because they can\u2019t get what their children need because the administration will not give them what they need, and the children are watching their parents be helpless, the parents are watching their children suffer and they\u2019re only spiraling worse.<\/p>\n

The administration has claimed all sorts of new authorities to detain people when it previously wouldn\u2019t have \u2026 people who have received parole to be in the country, who received permission to be here, who were released on their own recognizance, who the government said, \u201cYou are not a flight risk, you are not a danger. We will not detain you,\u201d and the government takes that back and says, \u201cActually, who cares? We\u2019re going to detain you.\u201d<\/p>\n

So, under what authority? Their whims, and the fact that there are people in charge right now who think they can get away with it.<\/p>\n

\"ProtestersProtesters gather earlier this year for a protest at an ICE family detention center in Dilley, south of San Antonio. Credit: Michael Karlis<\/p>\n

How did habeas corpus become the legal remedy sought out by people in detention centers? Before last year, there were few of these cases in federal courts. Now there are nearly <\/strong>40,000 active habeas cases in the United States, 9,000 of which are in Texas<\/strong><\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

It used to be that if you came to the border, the authority that governed your detention was authority related to the border, and courts were really friendly about saying that you didn\u2019t have access to what\u2019s called a bond hearing. So if you came to the border, you asked for asylum, and they wanted to detain you, they could; that\u2019s all there was to it. And we sort of accepted that lay of the land largely for reasons of national security.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But let\u2019s say you entered the country, you lived in the country for six or seven years, or you\u2019re released on your own recognizance, which happens a lot. \u2026 The Trump administration decided that all those people\u2014those who made it in, who were working, who had built community ties\u2014those people need to be arrested at alarming rates, but they can\u2019t go ask an immigration judge about whether to release them on bond or bail. Our current version of the Immigration Nationality Act, prior to 2025, every person in that situation \u2026 they likely would have been bond eligible. That bond hearing would have been a very quick procedure, takes about a week.<\/p>\n

Oftentimes, they have no criminal records, and we know the vast majority of people in detention have no criminal records, and the judge would go, \u2018Okay, for $1,500, you can go about your life while your immigration case is litigated.\u201d<\/p>\n

Now, though, the administration said, \u201cActually, we have a new interpretation of all this.\u201d \u2026 For example, you entered without inspection, you\u2019ve been in the country for 20 years. We arrest you in that instance. We\u2019re going to treat you like you never entered in the first place, like you have no community ties whatsoever. And we\u2019re going to say you\u2019re detained under a statute that has typically and historically been used for border enforcement, and that statute means that you have no right to ask to be out of detention. Since you can\u2019t ask an [immigration judge] anymore for help, there\u2019s only one place left to go, and that\u2019s federal court, and the remedy in federal court when you want to get out of detention is habeas corpus.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Now, general immigration practice has become habeas corpus. Because for your client to get out of detention, to fight their case out of detention, you have to win a habeas case in most instances.\u00a0<\/p>\n

During the 2018 family separation crisis, there were several instances of the federal government not being able to track the children or parents, or both. Some families were separated for years, and there are still families that haven\u2019t been reunited. With the Dilly detention center in mind, is there still a risk of that today?<\/strong><\/p>\n

When we have immigration detention and immigration arrests, mass deportation, the result of that is going to be parents without children and children without parents. That\u2019s what\u2019s going to happen. I think just generally, societally, we were told that only criminals will be arrested.<\/p>\n

If we believed that at one point, which I really do think a lot of good-meaning folks did believe that, that has completely been dispelled.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Family separation is happening en masse right now, just not in the zero-tolerance way that we saw happening \u2026 people getting lost, getting separated in the deportation system we have right now, which appears to be pure chaos. Folks are being sent to third countries without following the proper procedure, folks are getting dumped somewhere they\u2019ve never lived before. Folks are getting sent to Mexico without permission or without clear oversight. Very easy to lose immigrants that way. It\u2019s really hard to unring the bell, and that means families will be separated for prolonged periods of time, if not permanently.<\/p>\n

Senate Bill 4, from 2023, is the Texas law that allows police officers to arrest people they suspect illegally crossed into the United States and that effectively creates a state deportation process. It\u2019s now enforceable. Texas Civil Rights Project is one of the groups that sued to block SB 4 from becoming law, calling it unconstitutional for a state to enforce federal immigration law. How does being arrested by a Texas police officer complicate a person\u2019s immigration case?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

It complicates it because it introduces a new law enforcement agency with its own mission and its own ends. When we do immigration law, it\u2019s really administrative. It\u2019s dealing with the Executive Office of Immigration Review\u2014EOIR. It\u2019s immigration courts, very specific rules. It\u2019s dealing with ICE. ICE has very specific rules. There are ways to operate that are well settled and well trodden.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Now we have a new law enforcement agency that has its own removal orders, has its own mission, has its own guidance that\u2019s separate from the federal government, isn\u2019t bound necessarily by the rules of the federal government, maybe not in the same way. For example, regulations that ICE might be bound to, [Texas] may think it doesn\u2019t need to be bound to those, for whatever reason, and it\u2019s harder to argue that they are. That\u2019s going to create a level of chaos in handling immigration cases, and that chaos is almost always going to make it more difficult to help hardworking folks who are just trying to live and survive.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Is there something more that folks should know about this current moment regarding immigration law and people in detention?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

I would like to reiterate one point, which is that this should be a lesson for us. When someone comes selling the idea of mass deportations, this is going to be the result: Families in detention cells, children in detention cells, families separated. I think that there\u2019s a fantasy that if we just did immigration detention the \u201cright way,\u201d that families won\u2019t be separated, that people would not suffer.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The trade-off to accepting what I would call a fantasy is the suffering that we\u2019re seeing right now. So I hope that if people in the future think about mass deportation, and whether they want to support that policy or not, they think back to the present moment, they think about the people who have died, they think about the children who\u2019ve cried, they think about the folks who will never recover and ask themselves whether that is worth it.<\/p>\n

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Sign Up for SA Current newsletters.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Follow us:\u00a0Apple News<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Google News<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0NewsBreak<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Reddit<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Instagram<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Facebook\u00a0<\/a>| Twitter<\/a>\u00a0| Or sign up for our\u00a0RSS Feed<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Related Stories<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"South\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\tThe feature film, which follows the story of a rancher who accidentally shoots a young migrant woman, begins streaming Friday.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"White\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\u2018I\u2019m in uncharted, uncertain waters right now, and they just leave you that way, just to wonder,\u2019 said one Texas woman whose green card application is in limbo.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Government\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\tA U.S. General Accounting Office report found a host of problems at El Paso\u2019s Camp East Montana, including a contractor losing a loaded gun on the property after it opened.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t