{"id":8716,"date":"2025-06-23T18:53:10","date_gmt":"2025-06-23T18:53:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/8716\/"},"modified":"2025-06-23T18:53:10","modified_gmt":"2025-06-23T18:53:10","slug":"nhl-trade-grades-ducks-cut-bait-on-trevor-zegras-selling-low-to-flyers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/8716\/","title":{"rendered":"NHL trade grades: Ducks cut bait on Trevor Zegras, selling low to Flyers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/author\/corey-pronman\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Corey Pronman<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/author\/sean-gentille\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sean Gentille<\/a> and <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/author\/shayna-goldman\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Shayna Goldman<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Philadelphia Flyers get:<\/strong> F Trevor Zegras<\/p>\n<p><strong>Anaheim Ducks get:<\/strong> F Ryan Poehling, 2025 second-round pick (No. 45), 2026 fourth-round pick<\/p>\n<p><strong>Corey Pronman:<\/strong> Zegras\u2019 time in Anaheim was tumultuous. After a stellar rookie season where he dazzled, he encountered some bumps and frustrated his coaching staff over the past few years. He\u2019s a player with elite skill and hockey sense. NHL scouts have wondered if he can be a consistent 70- to 80-point player, given his remarkably skilled and creative abilities.<\/p>\n<p>He can be a legit top-six forward and can benefit a power play. However, he also has noticeable warts in his game. He\u2019s a below-average NHL skater who takes too many shifts and games off and rubs people the wrong way. Philadelphia has been searching for a center, and while Zegras has played center before, it\u2019s questionable if he can pivot in a significant role on a good NHL team.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a dramatic decline in value as well for a player Anaheim was hoping to get a high first-round pick or major young asset in return for when it first put him on the market. Zegras supporters will argue it\u2019s a potential buy-low scenario for the Flyers, given his massive potential, NHL track record and reasonable contract.<\/p>\n<p>His critics will say he\u2019s not a \u201cwinner\u201d and it\u2019s addition by subtraction for the Philadelphia while opening up opportunities for the Ducks\u2019 plethora of talented young forwards.<\/p>\n<p>I understand the latter argument, but the caliber of player, combined with the low price paid for him, seems a little off. This is a savvy move by the Flyers, which gave up very little, and if it doesn\u2019t work out, they can move him again in a rising cap environment. Owen Tippett had similar issues in Florida, and the Flyers did good work turning him into a useful NHL forward.<\/p>\n<p>Ryan Poehling is a 2026 free agent. He\u2019s a hardworking center with good skills, but he\u2019s not dynamic in terms of his pace and creativity. He\u2019s a bottom-six forward.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flyers grade: A-<br \/>Ducks grade:<\/strong> <strong>C+<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sean Gentille:<\/strong> In the summer of 2023, Zegras was 22 years old and coming off his second straight season with at least 20 goals and 60 points, one in which he shared the cover of EA\u2019s NHL 23. Not bad.<\/p>\n<p>Around that same time, Ryan Poehling was non-qualified by the Pittsburgh Penguins, the equivalent of a team saying, \u201cThanks, but no thanks.\u201d Not good.<\/p>\n<p>Now, somehow, three years later, Poehling was the primary player the Ducks brought back in a trade that, on their end, was more about dumping Zegras\u2019 salary than anything else.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that Anaheim moved on from Zegras \u2014 Michigan goals and all \u2014 shouldn\u2019t surprise anyone. He has been too frequently injured and ineffective for most of the past two seasons, which has hindered his momentum on and off the ice.<\/p>\n<p>Playing for Dallas Eakins and Greg Cronin probably didn\u2019t help. Zegras is an imperfectly electric player, and ditching too much of that on the road to two-way responsibility feels like it was a Pyrrhic victory. Zegras\u2019 name has been part of trade rumors for years. If this is what he\u2019s worth, one line of logic goes, this is what he\u2019s worth.<\/p>\n<p>Still, if you assume that to be true, the question for Anaheim should be why bother moving a 24-year-old with high-end offensive upside and (dampened) star power if the return is a decent fourth-line center, the 45th pick in one draft and a fourth-rounder from another?<\/p>\n<p>The best argument is that Zegras counts $5.75 million against the cap for one more season and future contract talks, given his career arc, could get bizarre. The Ducks also have extensions for other young forwards \u2014 namely, Leo Carlsson and Mason McTavish \u2014 to consider down the line.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, they\u2019re still more than $36 million under the salary cap, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/puckpedia.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">PuckPedia<\/a>. With only Pittsburgh starting the summer in traditional \u201cseller\u201d mode, why not wait and see how the market looks in a week or two? It\u2019s hard to imagine it being worse. That fact alone makes it impossible to give Anaheim anything other than a mediocre mark here. It\u2019s not just about the underwhelming return; it\u2019s about the road that brought them to it.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the Flyers got themselves a lottery ticket with solid odds. If Zegras\u2019 health holds up, his worst-case scenario probably lands him as an offense-only middle-six winger with power-play utility. His upside: the exact sort of high-end, top-six center that they\u2019ve been unable to add during their rebuild.<\/p>\n<p>The Athletic,\u00a0before the trade, ranked their <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6438796\/2025\/06\/23\/nhl-teams-center-ranking-free-agency-offseason\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">center depth chart <\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6438796\/2025\/06\/23\/nhl-teams-center-ranking-free-agency-offseason\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">second from the bottom<\/a> in the NHL. Regardless, Philadelphia desperately needs another potential offensive star to pair with Matvei Michkov, possibly on the same line, possibly not, and Zegras has a chance to fill the bill.<\/p>\n<p>Those sorts of players are best added through the draft. If that\u2019s not an option \u2014 and for the Flyers, it doesn\u2019t seem to be \u2014 then it\u2019s time to seek a different route. There\u2019s plenty to like about the one they\u2019ve chosen. It\u2019s not just about the player; it\u2019s about the fit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flyers grade:<\/strong> <strong>A<\/strong><br \/><strong>Ducks grade:<\/strong> <strong>D+<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Shayna Goldman:<\/strong> The big question around Zegras over the past few years is whether he has the chops to be a true franchise cornerstone to build around. At this point, it doesn\u2019t seem to be the case. However, that doesn\u2019t mean the Ducks should have shipped him off in an imbalanced deal.<\/p>\n<p>Zegras has his flaws: He isn\u2019t a perfect play-driver and has some defensive gaps in his game. After making some improvements in his zone in a condensed 2023-24, he took a step back this past season with the Ducks, allowing 0.26 more expected goals against per 60 relative to the rest of the team.<\/p>\n<p>And unlike seasons past, the offense wasn\u2019t enough to make up for it. Defense is a team-wide problem in Anaheim, and it seems to be overwhelming Zegras at this point. Pair that with some of the comps for Zegras at 24 and 25 years old \u2014 from Robby Fabbri and Chris Tierney to Sam Gagner \u2014 and there is reason to worry about his trajectory from here.<\/p>\n<p>But even if Zegras isn\u2019t worth the same hype that he once was, it doesn\u2019t make enough sense to sell him this low. Even if management wanted a deal done sooner rather than later, to go into next season with a clean slate, there is still an entire offseason ahead.<\/p>\n<p>Ryan Poehling addresses the Ducks\u2019 bottom-six need for more defensive upside, but he plus a second-rounder doesn\u2019t thread the needle enough. Because even if Zegras isn\u2019t meant to be the No. 1 center of a contender, his offensive strengths can be worth betting on in a different top-six capacity. Playoff teams still need complementary talent around their big guns, and there are signs that Zegras can be that. His creativity and puck-moving ability, which still track well according to AllThreeZones, are worth investing in.<\/p>\n<p>Even though Zegras\u2019 value has declined, it makes sense for a rebuilding team like the Flyers. Philadelphia has a defensive structure and strong two-way forwards, like Noah Cates and Sean Couturier. What they need is more high-octane offensive skill around Michkov and more depth down the middle, so he checks both of those boxes.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, this remains a gamble for the Flyers, but it\u2019s a low-risk, high-return bet worth investing in.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flyers grade:<\/strong> <strong>B+<\/strong><br \/><strong>Ducks grade:<\/strong> <strong>C-<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">(Photo: Tim Nwachukwu \/ Getty Images)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By Corey Pronman, Sean Gentille and Shayna Goldman Philadelphia Flyers get: F Trevor Zegras Anaheim Ducks get: F&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":8717,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[3115,293,3108,62,67,132,68],"class_list":{"0":"post-8716","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-nhl","8":"tag-anaheim-ducks","9":"tag-nhl","10":"tag-philadelphia-flyers","11":"tag-sports","12":"tag-united-states","13":"tag-unitedstates","14":"tag-us"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114734197412597140","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8716\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}