A group of business leaders submitted paperwork on Wednesday for a ballot measure that would repeal Los Angeles\u2019 gross receipts tax, delivering some financial relief to local employers but also punching an $800-million hole in the city budget.<\/p>\n
The proposed measure, called the \u201cLos Angeles Cost of Living Relief Initiative,\u201d would strip away a tax imposed on a vast array of businesses: entertainment companies, child care providers, law firms, accountants, healthcare businesses, nightclubs, delivery companies and many others, according to the group that submitted it.<\/p>\n
Backers said that repealing a tax long reviled by the business community would help address the city\u2019s economic woes, creating jobs, allowing businesses to stay in the city and making the economy \u201cmore affordable for all Angelenos.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThis initiative is the result of the business community uniting to fight the anti-job climate at City Hall,\u201d said Nella McOsker, president and CEO of the Central City Assn., a downtown-based business group.<\/p>\n
McOsker, one of five business leaders who signed the ballot proposal, said city officials have \u201cignored the pleas of small- and medium-sized businesses for years.\u201d As a result, scores of restaurants and other establishments, including the Mayan Theater<\/a>, are closing, she said.<\/p>\n The filing of the ballot proposal immediately set off alarms at City Hall, where officials recently signed off on a plan to lay off hundreds of city workers in an attempt to balance this year\u2019s budget. The city\u2019s business tax generates more than $800 million annually for the general fund \u2014 the part of the budget that pays for police patrols, firefighters, paramedic response and other core services.<\/p>\n \u201cPublic safety is almost exclusively paid for by the general fund,\u201d said City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo, in an email to The Times. \u201cThis measure is an assault on public safety. Proponents of this measure will be directly responsible for cutting police or fire staffing in half if it passes.\u201d<\/p>\n McOsker, asked about L.A.\u2019s financial woes, said the city had a $1-billion shortfall this year and still succeeded in balancing the budget. She is the daughter of City Councilmember Tim McOsker, who sits on the five-member budget committee.<\/p>\n The proposed measure is backed by executives and board members with various groups, including the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, the Greater San Fernando Valley Chamber of Commerce and VICA, the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn. <\/p>\n VICA president Stuart Waldman said the city\u2019s economy has faltered amid a spate of increased taxes, higher city fees and new regulations. The most recent, he said, is the ordinance hiking the minimum wage<\/a> for hotel employees and workers at Los Angeles International Airport to $30 per hour by 2028, which was approved by the City Council over objections from business leaders.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re usually playing defense,\u201d said Waldman, who also signed the ballot proposal. \u201cWe\u2019ve decided the time has come to play offense.\u201d<\/p>\n The business tax proposal is part of a larger ballot battle being waged this year between businesses and organized labor.<\/p>\n Last month, a group of airlines and hotel industry organizations turned in about 140,000 signatures for a proposed ballot measure aimed at overturning the newly approved hotel and LAX minimum wage<\/a>. L.A. County election officials are currently verifying those signatures.<\/p>\n Unite Here Local 11, which represents hotel employees, responded with its own package of countermeasures<\/a>. One would require a citywide election on the construction or expansion of hotels, sports stadiums, concert halls and other venues. Another would hike the minimum wage for all workers in the city, raising it to the level of hotel and airport employees.<\/p>\n Two other measures from Unite Here take aim at companies that pay their CEOs more than a hundred times their median employee in L.A., either by forcing them to pay higher business taxes or by placing limitations on their use of city property.<\/p>\n The ongoing ballot battle is \u201cescalating in ways that are reckless and disconnected from the real work of running a city,\u201d said Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, who heads the council\u2019s budget committee. Yaroslavsky, in a statement, said the fight is \u201cunproductive and needs to stop.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWe just closed a billion-dollar budget gap, and basic services are already severely strained,\u201d she said. \u201cYou don\u2019t fix that by removing one of our largest revenue sources with no plan to replace it. We have to fix what is broken and that requires working together to offer real solutions.\u201d<\/p>\n Josu\u00e9 Marcus, spokesperson for the Los Angeles City Clerk, said proponents of the latest ballot measure would need to gather about 140,000 valid signatures for it to qualify. The next city election is in June 2026. McOsker, for her part, said she believes that state law sets a lower threshold \u2014 only 44,000 \u2014 for measures that result in the elimination of taxes.<\/p>\n Industry leaders have long decried L.A.\u2019s business tax, which is levied not on profits but on the gross receipts that are brought in \u2014 even where an enterprise suffers financial losses.<\/p>\n Former Mayor Eric Garcetti argued for eliminating the tax<\/a> more than a decade ago, saying it puts the city\u2019s economy at a competitive disadvantage. Once in office, he only managed to scale it back<\/a>, amid concerns that an outright repeal would trigger cuts to city services.<\/p>\n Organizers of the latest proposal said it would not rescind business taxes on the sale of cannabis or medical marijuana, which were separately approved by voters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A group of business leaders submitted paperwork on Wednesday for a ballot measure that would repeal Los Angeles\u2019…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":87483,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5123],"tags":[58772,64,58771,58767,1582,276,2451,13237,58770,3772,79,58768,58766,2961,224,5337,289,25984,58769,1628],"class_list":["post-87482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-los-angeles","tag-ballot-proposal","tag-business","tag-business-leader","tag-business-tax","tag-ca","tag-california","tag-city","tag-city-budget","tag-city-worker","tag-commerce","tag-economy","tag-group-launch","tag-hotel-employee","tag-la","tag-los-angeles","tag-losangeles","tag-measure","tag-minimum-wage","tag-nella-mcosker","tag-year"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/114905799976383502","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87482\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/87483"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}