{"id":877765,"date":"2026-06-19T07:47:22","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T07:47:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/877765\/"},"modified":"2026-06-19T07:47:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-19T07:47:22","slug":"jewish-groups-hold-back-criticism-of-trumps-deal-in-contrast-to-obamas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/877765\/","title":{"rendered":"Jewish groups hold back criticism of Trump&#8217;s deal, in contrast to Obama&#8217;s"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">A growing number of Jewish groups are pushing back against the new memorandum of understanding brokered between US President Donald Trump and Iran.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">At least for now, however, their responses are more muted than when the same groups publicly opposed former president Barack Obama\u2019s own Iran deal in 2015. And at least one major Jewish group that opposed Obama\u2019s deal is backing Trump\u2019s framework.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTrust President Trump,\u201d the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/middle-east\/iran-news\/article-899910\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Republican<\/a> Jewish Coalition told its followers Thursday, becoming the most notable Jewish group to support Trump\u2019s memorandum of understanding.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cPresident Trump has earned the trust of the Jewish community as he and his team work towards a final agreement,\u201d RJC CEO Matt Brooks and chair Norm Coleman said in a statement. They praised the MoU, saying it \u201cenvisions a horizon of economic stability for the United States, the region, and the world,\u201d and that it \u201cprovides an opportunity for potential new pathways to greater peace.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The RJC cautioned that \u201ca final deal must avoid the flaws that doomed Obama\u2019s,\u201d specifying that there should be \u201cno sunset clauses\u201d on Iran\u2019s nuclear program and other proposals. In the days before its own statement, the group had been reposting praise of the MoU from other Trump allies, including Sen. Lindsey Graham.<\/p>\n<p><img alt=\"US President Donald Trump holds up the memorandum of understanding, signed by the US, and Iran, at the Palace of Versailles, in France.\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"632\" height=\"492\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"1\" style=\"color:transparent\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/726360.jpeg\"\/>US President Donald Trump holds up the memorandum of understanding, signed by the US, and Iran, at the Palace of Versailles, in France. (credit: SCREENSHOT\/TRUTH SOCIAL)<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Meanwhile, the American Jewish Committee and the pro-Israel lobbying giant AIPAC took a different tack. They became the largest Jewish organizations to voice concern with the new Iran deal on Thursday, issuing public objections following requests for comment from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.<\/p>\n<p>The MoU \u201craises significant questions,\u201d AIPAC said in a lengthy statement that urged Congress to intervene ahead of \u201ca final nuclear agreement,\u201d claiming that the terms of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/middle-east\/iran-news\/article-899761\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">MoU<\/a> don\u2019t match \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s stated objectives for the war.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The AJC outlined what it said were seven \u201cconcerns\u201d it had with the MoU. Like most of the other Jewish groups that responded to JTA for this story, the AJC also expressed hope that the terms of the deal could be changed to be stricter on Iran and more favorable to Israel before it is finalized. (In 2015, in response to Obama\u2019s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the AJC said it \u201coverwhelmingly\u201d would \u201coppose this deal.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Trump\u2019s MoU is not a final agreement, unlike Obama\u2019s JCPOA. Rather, it marks the start of a 60-day negotiating period that aims to end the Iran war about to enter its fourth month. It does not yet outline any clear commitments regarding Iran\u2019s nuclear program, which had been at the heart of the JCPOA and which is of particular concern to Jewish groups, who are roundly opposed to Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon in large part because of the risk to Israel. Many had objected to Obama\u2019s deal in part because of its \u201csunset clauses\u201d that would have phased out nuclear restrictions starting at the 10-year mark.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Regardless, many analysts across the political spectrum are concluding that Trump\u2019s framework is a worse deal than Obama\u2019s, in part because it provides a pathway for Iran to stage an economic recovery.<\/p>\n<p>The Israeli government, which sent Prime Minister<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/israel-news\/defense-news\/article-899856\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"> Benjamin Netanyahu<\/a> to personally lobby Congress in 2015 to oppose Obama\u2019s deal, is also strongly opposed to Trump\u2019s &#8211; in part because it would require Israel to withdraw from fighting Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. A new poll by Israel\u2019s Channel 12 found that 71% of Israelis don\u2019t trust Trump to look out for their country\u2019s interests in negotiations with Iran.<\/p>\n<p><img alt=\"US PRESIDENT Donald Trump, flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick speaks during a press conference, during the G7 Summit in Evian-les-Bains, France, June 17, 2026.\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"822\" height=\"829\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"1\" style=\"color:transparent\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/726078.jpeg\"\/>US PRESIDENT Donald Trump, flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick speaks during a press conference, during the G7 Summit in Evian-les-Bains, France, June 17, 2026. (credit: REUTERS\/EVELYN HOCKSTEIN)<strong>Trump&#8217;s deal weaker than Obama&#8217;s, Jewish think tank says<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Hawkish pro-Israel think tanks, including the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, issued papers knocking Trump\u2019s deal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cIn some ways, the MoU is even weaker than President Barack Obama\u2019s,\u201d JINSA said. \u201cThis new deal authorizes the transfer of far more money and lifts many more sanctions on Iran than the JCPOA ever did.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Trump and his top surrogates, including Vice President JD Vance, are increasingly signaling a lack of patience with Israel and a willingness to prioritize ending the war over stopping Iran\u2019s nuclear program.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Some groups are waiting before weighing in. Nathan Diament, head of the Orthodox Union, declared Obama\u2019s deal \u201cnot kosher\u201d in 2015. On Thursday, he told JTA that the question of how to respond to Trump\u2019s deal \u201cwill be a central topic of discussion\u201d at the group\u2019s leadership advocacy mission in Washington, DC, taking place early next week. OU representatives are scheduled to meet with members of the Trump administration, as well as members of Congress.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">JTA reached out Thursday to a wide range of Jewish groups that publicly opposed Obama\u2019s Iran deal in 2015 to ask them their views on Trump\u2019s. Many others, including the Anti-Defamation League and the Conservative movement\u2019s Rabbinical Assembly, did not respond by press time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Of those who did, only Morton Klein, head of the right-wing Zionist Organization of America, castigated the MoU outright. Klein told JTA he was \u201cextremely upset with this deal\u201d &#8211; and with Trump.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cI find this deal just astonishing,\u201d Klein said. \u201cHelping out a country that Trump himself said, if they\u2019d gotten nukes, they\u2019d have used them on Israel and killed millions of Jews? So that mentality, now you\u2019re helping them rebuild?\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">He added, \u201cTrump has done many wonderful things for Israel, so we\u2019ve praised Trump for that. But now he\u2019s doing something very bad for Israel and America.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jewish groups holding back on opposition to deal when compared to Obama&#8217;s<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Such level of forceful public opposition to the deal, though, is rare in Jewish circles at present &#8211; especially in contrast with the extent of Jewish mobilization against Obama\u2019s deal in 2015.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Back then, in addition to the usual Jewish advocacy groups, dozens of local Jewish federations across the country pushed their communities and representatives to fight it, in a sweeping and sustained show of opposition.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cThis Iran deal threatens the mission of our Federation as we exist to assure the continuity of the Jewish people, support a secure State of Israel, care for Jews in need here and abroad and mobilize on issues of concern,\u201d one typical statement, from the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, read at the time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Three years later, during Trump\u2019s first term, he tore up the JCPOA, calling it \u201ca horrible one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The lack of similar opposition today for Trump\u2019s deal, Klein said, was glaring: \u201cNobody is taking issue with this agreement in the Jewish world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Among local Jewish groups, the initial reaction to Trump\u2019s MoU has struck a measured tone. The Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, one of dozens of local Jewish communal groups that publicly opposed the 2015 JCPOA, told JTA it was \u201cconcerned\u201d that Trump\u2019s deal \u201chas granted Iran a new leverage point to use in the future to inflict pain on the world\u2019s economy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ron Halber, the JCRC\u2019s head, blasted the MoU for being crafted without Israel\u2019s input, and for requiring Israel to withdraw from its offensive against <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/international\/article-899909\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Hezbollah<\/a> in Lebanon. Similar to AIPAC, Halber said his organization would continue to push for \u201ca final US-Iran agreement\u201d that is more favorable to Israel and takes harsher measures against Iran.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">In its statement, the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia, which also opposed the JCPOA, did not directly weigh in on the new MoU. Instead, the federation said, \u201cAny agreement involving the Iranian regime should be judged by its ability to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran,\u201d among other factors.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">JTA reached out to six other major Jewish federations that opposed the 2015 JCPOA, including Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston, which was the first federation to oppose that deal and whose leader wrote, in 2021, \u201cWe were right.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">CJP of Boston did not respond to a request for comment. The Jewish United Fund of Chicago declined to comment, while several other federations that opposed the JCPOA &#8211; including Los Angeles, Miami, Phoenix and Detroit &#8211; did not respond by press time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">In its own statement opposing the MoU, AIPAC did not outline an advocacy plan to combat it, in contrast to its full-court press against the JCPOA. An AIPAC spokesperson did not return a JTA request for comment on whether, or how, it planned to advocate against Trump\u2019s MoU.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A growing number of Jewish groups are pushing back against the new memorandum of understanding brokered between US&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":877766,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[2],"tags":[110582,356718,11744,69,4783,83,6686,6111,99,256315,2066,13192,38339,50,257647,356719,354409,322027],"class_list":["post-877765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news","tag-aipac","tag-american-jewish-committee","tag-barack-obama","tag-donald-trump","tag-hezbollah","tag-iran","tag-iran-deal","tag-iran-nuclear","tag-israel","tag-jcpoa","tag-jd-vance","tag-lebanon","tag-memorandum-of-understanding","tag-news","tag-orthodox-union","tag-republican-jewish-coalition","tag-us-iran-deal","tag-zionist-organization-of-america"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116775673435845629","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/877765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=877765"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/877765\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/877766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=877765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=877765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=877765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}