{"id":886395,"date":"2026-06-23T04:30:12","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T04:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/886395\/"},"modified":"2026-06-23T04:30:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T04:30:12","slug":"trump-lawsuit-challenging-l-a-s-sanctuary-city-law-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/886395\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump lawsuit challenging L.A.\u2019s sanctuary city law dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration that sought to block what it called L.A.\u2019s \u201cillegal\u201d sanctuary city law. <\/p>\n<p>In a weekend ruling, U.S. District Judge Fernando M. Olguin granted the city\u2019s motion to dismiss the complaint, which alleged that the city ordinance violates the intergovernmental immunity doctrine by regulating and discriminating against the federal government. <\/p>\n<p>Olguin ruled that the government\u2019s allegations were \u201cinsufficient to establish that the Ordinance violates the intergovernmental immunity doctrine,\u201d but granted the administration permission to file an amended complaint by July 3.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Ordinance does not directly regulate the federal government,\u201d Olguin said in his ruling. \u201cRather, it \u2018controls the actions of [the City\u2019s] own agents and agencies.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The White House and the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. <\/p>\n<p>Although the administration could refile its complaint, L.A.. City Atty. Hydee \u200cFeldstein Soto celebrated the dismissal as a legal victory. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis order reinforces the well-established principle that local governments have the authority to decide how to use their personnel and resources,\u201d Feldstein Soto said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit, filed by the Trump administration in California\u2019s Central District federal court last June, said the country is \u201cfacing a crisis of illegal immigration\u201d and that its efforts to address it \u201care hindered by <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/california\/story\/2025-08-23\/sanctuary-city-funding-judge-ruling\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sanctuary Cities<\/a> such as the City of Los Angeles, which refuse to cooperate or share information, even when requested, with federal immigration authorities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit came as immigration agents descended on Southern California, arresting thousands of immigrants and prompting protests across the region.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe situation became so dire that the Federal Government deployed the California National Guard and United States Marines to quell the chaos,\u201d the lawsuit states. \u201cA direct confrontation with federal immigration authorities was the inevitable outcome of the Sanctuary City law.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The law was proposed in early 2023, long before Trump\u2019s election, but it was finalized in the <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/politics\/story\/2024-11-06\/how-trump-won-presidency\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">wake of his victory<\/a> in November 2024.<\/p>\n<p>Under the ordinance, city employees and city property may not be used to \u201cinvestigate, cite, arrest, hold, transfer or detain any person\u201d for the purpose of immigration enforcement. An exception is made for law enforcement investigating serious offenses.<\/p>\n<p>The ordinance bars city employees from seeking out information about an individual\u2019s citizenship or immigration status unless it is needed to provide a city service. They also must treat data or information that can be used to trace a person\u2019s citizenship or immigration status as confidential.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe goal of this ordinance, and of LAPD\u2019s immigration-related policies &#8230; is to encourage victims of and witnesses to crime to feel safe coming forward to seek help from LAPD regardless of their immigration status,\u201d Feldstein Soto said in her statement. \u201cIt does not obstruct or impede lawful federal immigration enforcement operations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The government in its original filing said that Trump campaigned and won the 2024 presidential election on a platform of deporting \u201cmillions of illegal immigrants.\u201d By enacting a sanctuary city ordinance, the City Council sought to \u201cthwart the will of the American people regarding deportations,\u201d the lawsuit states.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Supremacy Clause prohibits the City of Los Angeles and its officials from singling out the Federal Government for adverse treatment \u2014 as the challenged law and policies do \u2014 thereby discriminating against the Federal Government,\u201d the lawsuit says.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s Department of Justice contends that L.A.\u2019s sanctuary city ordinance goes much further than similar laws in other jurisdictions by \u201cseeking to undermine the Federal Government\u2019s immigration enforcement efforts.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration that sought to block what it&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":886396,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5123],"tags":[1582,276,29070,2451,239977,28126,2142,8618,86500,12644,2961,3228,379,224,2444,5337,36702,359634,359635],"class_list":["post-886395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-los-angeles","tag-ca","tag-california","tag-citizenship","tag-city","tag-city-employee","tag-complaint","tag-federal-government","tag-immigrant","tag-immigration-status","tag-information","tag-la","tag-law","tag-lawsuit","tag-los-angeles","tag-los-angeles-times","tag-losangeles","tag-ordinance","tag-sanctuary-city-ordinance","tag-trump-administration-lawsuit"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=886395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886395\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/886396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=886395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=886395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=886395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}