{"id":886621,"date":"2026-06-23T06:51:25","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T06:51:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/886621\/"},"modified":"2026-06-23T06:51:25","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T06:51:25","slug":"san-diego-city-council-considers-public-power","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/886621\/","title":{"rendered":"San Diego City Council considers public power"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SAN DIEGO (KGTV) \u2013 Imagine paying your energy bill not to San Diego Gas and Electric, but to a utility run by the City of San Diego.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>City leaders are trying to figure out if that&#8217;s possible.<\/p>\n<p>Right now, this is just an idea. The City said it has a responsibility to keep electrical costs low for residents. That&#8217;s what they&#8217;re trying to figure out. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe conversation is about what our options are instead of the status quo, because the status quo does not work,&#8221; said District 9 City Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera.<\/p>\n<p>They&#8217;ve hired a company to study that, but there&#8217;s still a lot of uncertainty.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese assets are tangible and realistic,\u201d Isaiah Glasoe, Program Director for Public Power San Diego, said.<\/p>\n<p>Tangible assets are one thing; having the funding, planning, and resilience to handle unpredictability is another.<\/p>\n<p>This Phase Two study examines <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/sandiego.hylandcloud.com\/211agendaonlinecouncil\/Documents\/ViewDocument\/Staff%20Report%20for%20-%20%20().pdf?meetingId=7055&amp;documentType=Agenda&amp;itemId=261991&amp;publishId=1110184&amp;isSection=false\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the realistic financial opportunities and the headaches <\/a>that come with the City of San Diego&#8217;s attempt to run its own electric utility company.<\/p>\n<p>According to a <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/sandiego.hylandcloud.com\/211agendaonlinecouncil\/Documents\/ViewDocument\/Item%20200%20-%20San%20Diego%20Public%20Power%20Feasibility%20Study%20Presentation%20-%20City%20Coun.pdf?meetingId=7055&amp;documentType=Agenda&amp;itemId=261991&amp;publishId=1110186&amp;isSection=false\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">city staff report<\/a>, it could cost the city somewhere between $2.4 billion and $7.6 billion for all of the transmission, distribution, and substations from SDG&amp;E to accomplish this possibility.<\/p>\n<p>The report says that while it&#8217;s possible for the city to undertake such a task, there are a lot of unknowns, and it would take a long time.<\/p>\n<p>A <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/sandiego.hylandcloud.com\/211agendaonlinecouncil\/Documents\/ViewDocument\/San%20Diego%20Public%20Power%20Feasibility%20II%20Report.pdf?meetingId=7055&amp;documentType=Agenda&amp;itemId=261991&amp;publishId=1110185&amp;isSection=false\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">contracted report shows<\/a> that residents could potentially see up to $500 per year in savings, but that would be years down the road.<\/p>\n<p>No matter the timeline, that was a welcomed discovery for the dozens of residents show showed up to City Hall to share their thoughts during Monday&#8217;s meeting.<\/p>\n<p>Glasoe said the study\u2019s findings are exciting to see.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis study studied public power in the most conservative way possible.\u00a0Um,\u00a0one of the specific numbers is the revenue growth rate of SDG&amp;E,\u201d Glasoe said. \u201cThis study assumed a 4% revenue growth rate, and SDG&amp;E <a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.10news.com\/news\/local-news\/\u201cThe question is not whether municipalization is possible. The question is whether the risk and cost are sufficiently understood before making a multi-billion dollar decision that could impact businesses and residents for decades.\u201d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">just applied for an 8.6% rate increase<\/a> this year in 2028,\u00a0which shows that\u00a0even in the most conservative models,\u00a0we still save money by switching to public power.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Several local union members, who also showed up Monday, and some tech leaders in the city, see it differently.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe question is not whether municipalization is possible,&#8221; said Kevin Carroll, Executive Director of Tech San Diego. The question is whether the risk and cost are sufficiently understood before making a multi-billion dollar decision that could impact businesses and residents for decades.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Anthony Stackhouse, with International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 465, challenged city councilmembers to \u201cbe honest with yourselves. You do not have the resources or knowledge to do this. Don\u2019t gamble with my job or the job of my union brothers or sisters because I promise one thing \u2014 we\u2019ll not go down without a fight.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>SDG&amp;E told  ABC 10News in a statement:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe city&#8217;s flawed study omits major risks to safety and reliability and understates the costs of seizing the electric grid that was previously estimated to be at least $9.3 billion based on a more limited scope than what is being considered here,\u201d Anthony Wagner, an SDG&amp;E spokesperson, said. \u201cIn fact, as noted by Mayor Gloria, the study fails to utilize the correct methodology required by state regulators, which will raise costs and impact feasibility. Our customers and local taxpayers deserve accurate assessments.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Monday&#8217;s discussion was just that \u2014 there was no vote, and there won&#8217;t be one for quite some time. <\/p>\n<p>City councilmembers will continue to evaluate the report before moving forward \u2014 if that&#8217;s what they eventually decide to do \u2014 and based on Monday&#8217;s meeting, that path appears to have momentum.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"SAN DIEGO (KGTV) \u2013 Imagine paying your energy bill not to San Diego Gas and Electric, but to&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":886622,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5134],"tags":[5229,1582,276,5310,46663,59867,6172,359718,3549,359719,7264,359720,44078,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":["post-886621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-san-diego","tag-america","tag-ca","tag-california","tag-city-council","tag-city-of-san-diego","tag-electric","tag-power","tag-power-in-san-diego","tag-san-diego","tag-san-diego-buying-sdg-and-e","tag-sandiego","tag-sdg-and-e-san-diego","tag-sdge","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-unitedstates","tag-unitedstatesofamerica","tag-us","tag-usa"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116798100906016494","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=886621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886621\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/886622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=886621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=886621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=886621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}