{"id":886812,"date":"2026-06-23T08:47:18","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T08:47:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/886812\/"},"modified":"2026-06-23T08:47:18","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T08:47:18","slug":"oregon-hospitals-receiving-37-million-in-effort-to-preserve-rural-maternity-care","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/886812\/","title":{"rendered":"Oregon hospitals receiving $37 million in effort to preserve rural maternity care"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nearly two dozen Oregon rural hospitals will receive $37.5 million in state and federal funds to shore up labor and delivery care ahead of Medicaid cuts going into effect next year, though state and hospital officials say the one-time funds are likely a limited solution. <\/p>\n<p>The program, which was greenlit by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services last month, combines $15 million in state dollars with more than $22 million in federal matching funds. The money will be distributed to the state\u2019s 21 rural hospitals that provide maternity care, most of which are more than 50 miles from the next closest birth center. <\/p>\n<p>The funding was announced after a number of rural hospitals across Oregon have closed \u2014 or threatened to close \u2014 their labor and delivery units, which typically cost more to operate than they bring in. As <a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investigatewest.org\/rural-oregon-town-lost-maternity-ward-medicaid-cuts\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">InvestigateWest highlighted<\/a>, these services are often eliminated when a struggling hospital is trying to prevent closure altogether.<\/p>\n<p>Oregon officials described this new assistance as a short-term buffer against the financial pressures facing rural hospitals that put their maternity services at risk, including rising costs, staffing shortages, and looming changes in Medicaid eligibility and spending.<\/p>\n<p>The tax cuts and spending package passed by Congress that made these changes, known as H.R. 1 or the \u201cOne Big Beautiful Bill,\u201d is expected to wipe out roughly $11 billion in federal support for Oregon\u2019s Medicaid program over the next five years, according to an estimate from Gov. Tina Kotek\u2019s office. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI fought for these funds in my budget to stabilize services in Oregon because rural communities deserve reliable, high quality maternity care close to home,\u201d Kotek said in a May 28 news release announcing the funding.<\/p>\n<p>While the additional funds will provide a limited cushion for hospitals before sweeping changes to the federal program start to take effect in January, hospital leaders told InvestigateWest they remain concerned it won\u2019t be enough to prevent further erosion to rural maternal healthcare in the coming years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA one-time payment in and of itself isn\u2019t going to solve a long-term problem, but it will help us for now,\u201d said Dan Grigg, CEO of Wallowa Memorial Hospital, a rural healthcare center in the northeasternmost corner of Oregon that delivers about 50 babies a year.<\/p>\n<p>Ashley Thirstrup, Oregon Health Authority chief of staff and external relations division director, said the agency recognizes the constraints of the one-off investment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe scale of the Medicaid cuts proposed in H.R. 1 is going to put significant pressure on the system overall,\u201d she said. \u201cI don\u2019t think we\u2019re thinking this hole is going to be plugged by these dollars alone.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Rural hospitals, most of which are already operating with precarious margins, are rarely able to recoup the cost of running a labor and delivery unit, in part because they see fewer patients than their urban counterparts. <\/p>\n<p>With more than half of all births in Oregon covered by Medicaid, these facilities worry the federal cuts will crater their finances and force more maternity wards to close. The result would leave more pregnant women in the state to travel long distances to receive prenatal care or give birth, resulting in more dangerous pregnancies and higher risk of infant mortality.<\/p>\n<p>The Oregon Health Authority will distribute the $37.5 million fund to hospitals based on the total number of Medicaid patients they care for throughout 2026, according to the <a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\" href=\"https:\/\/www.medicaid.gov\/medicaid\/managed-care\/downloads\/OR_Fee_IPH.OPH6_New_20260101-20261231.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">application submitted<\/a> to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, meaning hospitals that get more patients covered by the program will likely get more money. The amount each hospital will receive is still being finalized, but officials plan to send out the first dollars before the end of the year.<\/p>\n<p>State officials say the funds are intended to narrow the gap between what Medicaid pays back to healthcare providers and the actual cost of care. Hospitals may use the payment to cover maternity care-related expenses, like hiring or retaining staff, training, or updating equipment.<\/p>\n<p>These costs have been cited by hospital leaders as a driving force behind recent decisions to wind down maternity services. Both Providence Seaside Hospital on the North Coast and McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center outside Eugene, Oregon described challenges recruiting doctors and recouping costs through reimbursement when they closed their programs last fall.<\/p>\n<p>In Oregon\u2019s southeast corner, the payments could be a boon for Malheur County, which has the highest Medicaid enrollment of any county in the state. The county has one hospital and birthing center, Saint Alphonsus Medical Center in Ontario. The next closest hospital for pregnant women to receive care is across state lines in Boise, more than 50 miles away.<\/p>\n<p>Grigg, the CEO at Wallowa Memorial, said the small district hospital will likely use their share of the $37.5 million to fund existing needs, such as backpay for on-call physicians. Since the funding isn\u2019t ongoing, Wallowa likely won\u2019t use it to hire more staff or grow services, he said. <\/p>\n<p>St. Charles Madras in Central Oregon, another hospital serving a large number of Medicaid patients, loses about $1 million each year on its labor and delivery service, said Kimberli Munn, chief nursing officer.<\/p>\n<p>Munn said the hospital is considering using the payments to buy new monitors or introduce a neonatal telehealth system that would allow their clinicians to consult with outside physicians in the event of an emergency. Both options would still require alternative funding sources when the assistance runs out.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou would need continual funding to keep it sustained,\u201d Munn said, referring to the telehealth program. <\/p>\n<p>Oregon Health Authority officials say they also plan to draw on another federal grant, the Rural Health Transformation Fund, to prevent further loss in the state\u2019s maternity services. <\/p>\n<p>The $50 billion, five-year initiative created by the \u201cOne Big Beautiful Bill\u201d was described by Senate Republicans as a form of \u201cimmediate relief\u201d to preserve rural health access. The Trump administration has said they intend to prioritize efforts to modernize care.<\/p>\n<p>Oregon received $197 million through the fund for 2026 \u2014 a fraction of the cuts to the Medicaid program state officials are anticipating. It\u2019s difficult to determine how much the grants will help to offset losses rural hospitals are expecting with the Medicaid changes, as implementation will happen gradually and the effects are expected to grow once the funds are spent, according to the <a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kff.org\/medicaid\/comparing-states-rural-health-fund-allotments-to-medicaid-spending-cuts-can-be-misleading\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">nonprofit policy research group KFF<\/a>. Federal health officials say they will assess future awards based on states\u2019 progress towards implementing the program\u2019s goals. <\/p>\n<p>Thirstrup said the agency plans to use the dollars they put towards maternity services to experiment or expand models that incorporate other providers into obstetrics care \u2014 like midwives and family medicine doctors \u2014 as well as provide workforce development and training.<\/p>\n<p>One of the first Rural Health Transformation Fund grants <a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oregon.gov\/oha\/hpa\/hp\/pages\/rhtp-awards.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">approved by<\/a> Oregon Health Authority is a $1.2 million, two-year mobile training initiative by the Oregon Perinatal Collaborative that will give rural providers an opportunity to practice responding to maternal or neonatal emergencies they may not encounter often.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re going to continue to look for any available resource we can find \u2014 federal, state or otherwise \u2014 in order to shore up these critical services,\u201d Thirstup said.<\/p>\n<p>___<\/p>\n<p>This story was originally published by <a class=\"Link AnClick-LinkEnhancement\" data-gtm-enhancement-style=\"LinkEnhancementA\" href=\"https:\/\/www.investigatewest.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">InvestigateWest<\/a> and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Nearly two dozen Oregon rural hospitals will receive $37.5 million in state and federal funds to shore up&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":535580,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[35],"tags":[16542,359775,64,359774,69,60,57,330,210,1141,3270,9166,1142,3235,6065,212,80,136288,61,67,132,68],"class_list":["post-886812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-health-care","tag-access-to-health-care","tag-ashley-thirstrup","tag-business","tag-dan-grigg","tag-donald-trump","tag-financial-services","tag-general-news","tag-government-programs","tag-health","tag-health-care","tag-health-care-costs","tag-health-care-industry","tag-healthcare","tag-medicare","tag-or-state-wire","tag-oregon","tag-politics","tag-tina-kotek","tag-u-s-news","tag-united-states","tag-unitedstates","tag-us"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116798556824281655","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=886812"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886812\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/535580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=886812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=886812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=886812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}