Townhomes, row houses and bungalow courts are likely coming to 57 neighborhoods across L.A. as part of the city\u2019s plan to delay Senate Bill 79.<\/p>\n
The historic housing bill<\/a>, which took effect Wednesday, was written in hopes of addressing California\u2019s housing crisis. It\u2019s designed to boost apartment construction by overriding local zoning laws and allowing taller, denser developments near bus stops and train stations: up to nine stories for buildings adjacent to certain transit stops, seven stories for buildings within a quarter-mile and six stories for buildings within a half-mile.<\/p>\n It serves as a definitive statement from Sacramento lawmakers to cities that have failed to keep up with housing demand in recent years, including Los Angeles, where single-family housing is still king. However, the bill was so contentious that in order to squeak it through, legislators stuffed it full of carve-outs and exemptions, allowing cities to delay implementation by passing their own plans to add density.<\/p>\n That\u2019s exactly what many Southern California cities \u2014 including Beverly Hills<\/a>, Pasadena<\/a>, Glendale<\/a> and L.A.<\/a> \u2014 chose to do.<\/p>\n If L.A. had done nothing, the area surrounding more than 150 transit stops would\u2019ve been immediately upzoned as of July 1. To mitigate the effects, L.A. adopted the Low-Rise Ordinance<\/a>, which allows it to delay SB 79 until 2030 by adding light density across a smaller number of areas.<\/p>\n In other words, L.A. will allow a little more density, but not as much as SB 79 calls for.<\/p>\n Under the ordinance, developers can now build up to four-story buildings with up to 16 units on lots that were previously zoned for single-family homes. The 57 areas are mostly in Central L.A., West L.A. the Eastside and the San Fernando Valley.<\/p>\n Not every lot in these neighborhoods is upzoned, however. Many areas have been exempted for a variety of reasons, including lots in hillside fire zones and lots in Historic Protection Overlay Zones.<\/p>\n To check whether specific parcels are included in the ordinance, follow this link<\/a> and check the box that says \u201cOpportunity Station Sites Eligible for Low Rise.\u201d<\/p>\n The ordinance marks a brief respite in the monthslong scramble to adapt to the broad changes brought by SB 79.<\/p>\n As the bill wound its way through Sacramento, L.A. City Council passed a resolution<\/a> opposing it, calling it \u201cchaos\u201d and a \u201cone-size-fits-all mandate.\u201d In September, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass urged Gov. Gavin Newsom to veto the bill.<\/p>\n Once it was passed in October, cities, homeowners, developers and even politicians scrambled to figure out the ramifications. Amateur cartographers<\/a> released homemade maps<\/a> of potential upzoned areas, while some cities wavered<\/a> over whether their stops would be included or not.<\/p>\n L.A. City Council adopted its \u201clow-rise\u201d strategy in March and approved it in late June. On Tuesday, a spokesperson for Bass supported the plan.<\/p>\n \u201cThis local approach to SB 79 will help create more housing near transit, expand housing options for working families, and support a more sustainable future for LA,\u201d said Kolby Lee, a spokesperson for Bass. \u201cThe Mayor appreciates the work of the City Council and City Planning to develop a plan that complies with state law, reflects the needs of our communities, and expands on our ongoing efforts to cut red tape and deliver housing while respecting the character of our neighborhoods.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Townhomes, row houses and bungalow courts are likely coming to 57 neighborhoods across L.A. as part of the…\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":905254,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5123],"tags":[7910,9102,1582,276,2451,9364,6276,2961,224,5337,7088,20038,36702,18416,366374,3440,49207,27184,645],"class_list":["post-905253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-los-angeles","tag-area","tag-building","tag-ca","tag-california","tag-city","tag-density","tag-l-a","tag-la","tag-los-angeles","tag-losangeles","tag-lot","tag-neighborhood","tag-ordinance","tag-plan","tag-sacramento-lawmaker","tag-sb","tag-senate-bill","tag-spokesperson","tag-story"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116844355157687080","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=905253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905253\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/905254"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=905253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=905253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=905253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}