{"id":958946,"date":"2026-07-25T19:55:15","date_gmt":"2026-07-25T19:55:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/958946\/"},"modified":"2026-07-25T19:55:15","modified_gmt":"2026-07-25T19:55:15","slug":"fort-worth-zoning-commission-backs-duplex-proposals-aimed-at-adding-affordable-housing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/958946\/","title":{"rendered":"Fort Worth Zoning Commission backs duplex proposals aimed at adding affordable housing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"&quot;byline&quot;\">by The FWR Staff, Fort Worth Report <br \/>July 25, 2026<\/p>\n<p>The Fort Worth Zoning Commission recommended approval of several residential and commercial zoning requests, including a conditional use permit for an oil-change business on Blue Mound Road and two duplex projects aimed at adding affordable housing.<\/p>\n<p>The commission also broke with city staff by recommending approval of a duplex request in a historic neighborhood. The cases go to the city council for consideration.<\/p>\n<p>2026 Zoning Commission<\/p>\n<p><strong>Documenter:<\/strong> Lou Chapman<\/p>\n<p><strong>Date<\/strong>: July 8, 2026<\/p>\n<p>To learn more about this meeting, click <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fortworthtexas.gov\/departments\/citysecretary\/events\/zoning-commission-agenda-2026\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>. For the agenda, click <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fortworthtexas.gov\/files\/assets\/public\/v\/1\/city-secretary\/documents\/calendar\/2026-agendas\/bampc\/zoning\/7-08-2026-zoning-agenda.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>One of the meeting&#8217;s more closely watched cases involved <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fortworthtexas.gov\/files\/assets\/public\/v\/1\/city-secretary\/documents\/calendar\/2026-agendas\/bampc\/zoning\/7-08-2026-zoning-agenda.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">6732 Blue Mound Road<\/a>, where the applicant asked for a conditional use permit to operate a Take 5 oil-change facility. The applicant sought straight commercial zoning but revised their plan after city staff raised concerns about compatibility with other land uses.<\/p>\n<p>The updated plan added landscaping and increased buffering from nearby homes and a warehouse, prompting staff to recommend approval. The commission unanimously agreed after hearing there was no public opposition.<\/p>\n<p>The commission&#8217;s most notable departure from staff recommendations came on a request to rezone 604 Luxton St., within the Historic Southside, from single-family to two-family residential.<\/p>\n<p>Planning staff recommended denial, citing inconsistency with the city&#8217;s comprehensive plan and long-term vision for restoring the area to predominantly single-family housing. However, property owner Gerald Whitfield argued during the commission\u2019s public hearing that his lot sits between existing multifamily buildings, and that he simply wanted to build a duplex.<\/p>\n<p>Commission members wrestled with balancing the city&#8217;s future land-use plans against current neighborhood conditions. Chair Jeremy Raines acknowledged the request conflicted with the comprehensive plan, but he noted no one spoke at the hearing in opposition to the zoning change.<\/p>\n<p>Other commissioners, including Charles Edmonds, representing City Council District 5, pointed to the need for additional housing and the property&#8217;s proximity to existing multifamily development and nearby industrial uses as reasons to approve the request. The commission ultimately voted 11-0 to recommend approval.<\/p>\n<p>The commission also unanimously approved a rezoning request for 1910 and 1912 Amanda Ave., where Ebenezer Missionary Baptist Church and a neighboring property owner plan to develop two-family housing in the Stop Six Overlay District.<\/p>\n<p>Although staff had received a letter from a neighborhood association expressing concern about additional duplex development, no one spoke in opposition during the public hearing.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Nishimura_ZoningComish-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-686430\"\/>Bruce Datcher, pastor of Ebenezer Missionary Baptist Church, speaks to Fort Worth Zoning Commissioners on July 8. (Scott Nishimura | Fort Worth Report)<\/p>\n<p>Church pastor Bruce Datcher told commissioners the proposal differs from traditional side-by-side duplexes and reflects the church&#8217;s long history of investing in the neighborhood. Staff had recommended approval, citing the city&#8217;s goal of encouraging additional residential density in the area.<\/p>\n<p>Several other cases generated discussion, but ended with continuances or routine approvals, including an industrial development proposal for 1401 Alemeda St. that was postponed until September to allow the development team time to communicate with additional neighborhood groups.<\/p>\n<p>Lou Chapman is a member of the <a href=\"https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/documenters\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Fort Worth Report Documenters<\/a> crew. If you believe anything in this account is inaccurate, please email us at news@fortworthreport.org with \u201cCorrection Request\u201d in the subject line.<\/p>\n<p>This &lt;a target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; href=&#8221;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/2026\/07\/25\/fort-worth-zoning-commission-backs-duplex-proposals-aimed-at-adding-affordable-housing\/&#8221;&gt;article&lt;\/a&gt; first appeared on &lt;a target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; href=&#8221;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org&#8221;&gt;Fort Worth Report&lt;\/a&gt; and is republished here under a &lt;a target=&#8221;_blank&#8221; href=&#8221;https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nd\/4.0\/&#8221;&gt;Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License&lt;\/a&gt;.&lt;img src=&#8221;https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/fortworthreport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/cropped-favicon.png?resize=150%2C150&amp;amp;ssl=1&#8243; style=&#8221;width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;&#8221;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>&lt;img id=&#8221;republication-tracker-tool-source&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/?republication-pixel=true&amp;post=684448&amp;amp;ga4=2820184429&#8243; style=&#8221;width:1px;height:1px;&#8221;&gt;&lt;script&gt; PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: &#8220;https:\/\/fortworthreport.org\/2026\/07\/25\/fort-worth-zoning-commission-backs-duplex-proposals-aimed-at-adding-affordable-housing\/&#8221;, urlref: window.location.href }); } } &lt;\/script&gt; &lt;script id=&#8221;parsely-cfg&#8221; src=&#8221;\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/fortworthreport.org\/p.js&#8221;&gt;&lt;\/script&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"by The FWR Staff, Fort Worth Report July 25, 2026 The Fort Worth Zoning Commission recommended approval of&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":958947,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5138],"tags":[852,5229,14614,7371,14615,14616,7372,385610,224405,358,3187,67,586,132,5230,68,2969],"class_list":["post-958946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-fort-worth","tag-affordable-housing","tag-america","tag-documenters","tag-fort-worth","tag-fort-worth-documenters","tag-fort-worth-report-documenters","tag-fortworth","tag-southeast-fort-worth","tag-stop-six","tag-texas","tag-tx","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-of-america","tag-unitedstates","tag-unitedstatesofamerica","tag-us","tag-usa"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116982378858790777","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/958946","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=958946"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/958946\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/958947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=958946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=958946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=958946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}