{"id":961062,"date":"2026-07-26T20:16:36","date_gmt":"2026-07-26T20:16:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/961062\/"},"modified":"2026-07-26T20:16:36","modified_gmt":"2026-07-26T20:16:36","slug":"ealas-no-29-wta-ranking-is-a-joke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/961062\/","title":{"rendered":"Eala\u2019s No. 29 WTA ranking is a joke"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I find it a joke that Alex Eala is ranked No. 29 in the current WTA standings.<\/p>\n<p>She should be ranked higher.<\/p>\n<p>However, I still cannot contest that ranking because the WTA listing is based on points earned by a player from tournaments.<\/p>\n<p>And each tournament has varying levels of points awarded depending on level of competition. This means that a Grand Slam victory earns a tennis player more points compared to 250 and 125 events.<\/p>\n<p>This is what the WTA says in its website on points earned by tennis players:<\/p>\n<p>Get the latest news<br \/>\n                <br class=\"br-line\"\/><br \/>\n                delivered to your inbox<\/p>\n<p>Sign up for The Manila Times newsletters<\/p>\n<p>            By signing up with an email address, I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.manilatimes.net\/terms-of-service\" title=\"Terms of Service\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Terms of Service<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.manilatimes.net\/privacy-policy\" title=\"Privacy Policy\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Privacy Policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA player&#8217;s ranking is determined by results at a maximum of 18 tournaments for singles and 12 for doubles. Points are awarded based on the level of tournament and a player&#8217;s round-by-round progression at that tournament.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Fair enough?<\/p>\n<p>Looking at the WTA\u2019s explanation, one thing is left out in its scoring system: Quality of opposition.<\/p>\n<p>So, let\u2019s say Player A wins the championship of a WTA 1000 event but beats competition mostly ranked below No. 40 with none of them being Grand Slam champions. For sure, Player A will get the most points from the WTA 1000 event because he or she won the title.<\/p>\n<p>However, what if Player B reaches only the quarterfinals but beats two top 10 players before getting beaten by a top 20 player. For sure, Player B will still get less points because he or she did not win the WTA 1000 title.<\/p>\n<p>Now, is that fair?<\/p>\n<p>From where I stand, that is not fair. For one, beating a top 10 player or a Grand Slam champion is harder than beating unheralded opponents enroute to the championship.<\/p>\n<p>So, I think Eala should have gotten additional points in beating current WTA No. 2 and 2026 Australian Open champion Elene Rybakina and and No. 10 and multi-titled Elina Svitolina at Berlin, and defeating defending Wimbledon champion Iga Swiatek in the third round of the Grand Slam.<\/p>\n<p>Comparatively speaking, one player from Poland who went on to contend for the French Open 2026 title is higher than Eala, even if she beat only one top 10 player.<\/p>\n<p>So, Eala being ranked at No. 29 looks strange to me at this point, considering her beating Rybakina, Svitolina, and Swiatek in a less four weeks cannot be overlooked.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, read that again \u2013 Eala beat three top 10 players \u2013 two of them Grand Slam champions \u2013 in less than four weeks.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe the WTA should give additional points to players who beats a top 10 player?\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>And how about the unquantifiable impact a tennis player has on the sport?<\/p>\n<p>Am I asking too much? \u2028Perhaps tennis needs another ranking body, like by a top and respected magazine or social media platform devoted to the sport.<\/p>\n<p>One such ranking entity for boxing exists \u2013 The Ring Magazine &#8211; which has its own rankings for all divisions and the pound-for-pound (P4P) made up of the best fighters regardless of weight division. Manny Pacquiao and Nonito Donaire at one point of their careers were in The Ring P4P rankings.<\/p>\n<p>However, boxing rankings are not necessarily perfect, including from The Ring Magazine, as they also take into account the views of analysts and boxing writers, who have their own biases.<\/p>\n<p>So, I see a flaw in the current The Ring Magazine rankings, as I believe heavyweight Olyksander Usyk should be ranked at No. 1 and not super bantamweight Naoya Inoue.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The international sanctioning bodies of boxing also take into account the quality of opposition a boxer beats. So, a boxer beating an ex-world champion or a highly-ranked prospect will most likely get a higher ranking than a boxer who feasted on cream puffs and tomato cans to compile an impressive record.<\/p>\n<p>Going back to Eala \u2013 I have to accept the fact that she is ranked at No. 29 by the WTA because the leading tennis body\u2019s ranking system is \u2013 it is what it is.<\/p>\n<p>But don\u2019t blame Eala if she eclipses other higher-ranked players because like I said before \u2013 she is rewriting the rules on who gets the spotlight in tennis.<\/p>\n<p>And woe to Eala\u2019s haters and bashers, because they can\u2019t do anything about that.<\/p>\n<p>(end) \u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"I find it a joke that Alex Eala is ranked No. 29 in the current WTA standings. She&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":961063,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[48],"tags":[125083,190,386474,1622,151507,471,16996,62,1464,67,132,68,2212],"class_list":["post-961062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-tennis","tag-125083","tag-a","tag-ealas","tag-is","tag-joke","tag-no","tag-ranking","tag-sports","tag-tennis","tag-united-states","tag-unitedstates","tag-us","tag-wta"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@us\/116988122683782184","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/961062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=961062"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/961062\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/961063"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=961062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=961062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=961062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}