The top editor of Forbes left his job last month after an \u201cundisclosed conflict of interest\u201d and was reportedly dismissed for accepting $6 million from the founder of a firm that does business with the magazine.<\/p>\n
The New York Times reported this week<\/a> that Randall Lane was paid by RJ Shook, whose company, Shook Research, worked with Forbes since 2016 to publish rankings of wealth advisers. The payment was made after Shook sold a majority stake in the company to a private equity firm a year ago. <\/p>\n A internal email dated July 23 and reviewed by The Associated Press confirmed that Lane, who had been editor and chief content officer, no longer worked for the company. It provided no other details of his departure. Lane had worked for Forbes for nearly 16 years and as its top editor since 2017. <\/p>\n \u201cWhen this undisclosed conflict of interest was brought to our attention, we examined the situation closely and took the appropriate action immediately,\u201d a spokesperson for Forbes said in an email Thursday. She added: \u201cForbes remains focused on delivering trusted journalism.\u201d <\/p>\n A person who works at Forbes and spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue told the AP that the staff discovered the apparent reasons behind the firing by reading the Times story. A subsequent email sent out this week said the company could not comment on the matter further. <\/p>\n Former editor quoted as saying he \u2018made a mistake\u2019<\/p>\n The Times quoted a person familiar with Lane\u2019s thinking as saying he considered the payment a gift in return for advice he had provided Shook over the years.<\/p>\n \u201c\u2018I made a mistake, and I take responsibility for it,\u201d Mr. Lane said in a statement to The Times. I should have disclosed the gift and failing to was a serious error in judgment. I deeply regret that, and I lost the job and team I love because of it.\u201d <\/p>\n Lane and a spokesperson for Forbes did not respond to requests for comment. <\/p>\n It\u2019s unclear why Shook paid Lane. But the company and Forbes apparently had a close relationship. On its website, for example, Shook Research lists 12 rankings of wealth advisers and management teams in partnership with Forbes.<\/p>\n Also unclear is why Lane thought disclosing the payment would have solved the ethical issues it may have raised. Traditional newsrooms typically forbid journalists from accepting payments from sources or business partners to avoid conflicts of interest \u2014 or even the appearance of conflict. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n \n Sign up for Morning Wire:<\/strong>
\n Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.\n <\/p>\n