Home World Energy EIA Stats: China drastically reduces fission power construction. EIA Headline: China rapidly growing fission power.EEnergyEIA Stats: China drastically reduces fission power construction. EIA Headline: China rapidly growing fission power.May 6, 2024 EIA Stats: China drastically reduces fission power construction. EIA Headline: China rapidly growing fission power. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61927&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=EIAsocial&utm_id=Amplification by llama-lime 2 commentsIt looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61927](https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61927)******* ^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)23.7 GW under construction due to finish in next decade vs ~30GW completed last decade? Seems like roughly the same pace of construction given that the mean construction time is less than 7 yearsLeave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment.
It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61927](https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61927)******* ^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
23.7 GW under construction due to finish in next decade vs ~30GW completed last decade? Seems like roughly the same pace of construction given that the mean construction time is less than 7 years
2 comments
It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61927](https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61927)**
*****
^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)
23.7 GW under construction due to finish in next decade vs ~30GW completed last decade? Seems like roughly the same pace of construction given that the mean construction time is less than 7 years