‘Blade Runners’ destroying Sadiq Khan’s Ulez cameras vow to carry on until every one is down ‘no matter what’



‘Blade Runners’ destroying Sadiq Khan’s Ulez cameras vow to carry on until every one is down ‘no matter what’

29 comments
  1. Environmental devastation? Don’t care! Creeping authoritarianism? Never heard of ‘er! Cratering living standards? I’m alright jack. Asking a middle-aged sad sack to get out of his big boy car? A step too far.

  2. No, just no. You’re not a bunch of blade runners. They’re on the side of stopping bad things happening. You’re committing crimes. And the fact that you’re being interviewed means sooner or later you’re going to get caught. And all those cameras you morons destroyed, you’re going to be charged for the destruction of each and everyone of them.

  3. In the end the enforcement of the ULEZ is all a bit pointless – impacts petrol engines cars over 18 years old, diesels over 8 years old – and the average age of cars on the road is 8 years old. Only 7 years left of non zero emission cars left… and emissions are going to come down anyway as pre Euro 6 diesels get scrapped.

  4. I wish those people could go spend a week in cities where there’s no limitations or regulations on cars.

    Park anywhere, drive everywhere, pollute as much as possible.

    I have been to such cities like Cairo, Beirut etc.. and the cars were an absolute nightmare as opposed to somewhere like Amsterdam or Barcelona or even poorer Tangier in Morocco.

    These otherwise nice cities would be 100x better with more restrictions on cars.

    I wish more people could travel more.

  5. It would make more sense if they called themselves Nexus or Nexus 6. The Blade Runners were the ones who used the Voight-Kampff machines with the cameras.

  6. Funny thing is the ULEZ is a poor tax that allows the rich to swan around in their Chelsea chariots and super cars while the poor are forced into “pens” on wheels as cattle to get to work, it’s not in the interest of cutting emissions is to keep the city and it’s environs roads free of the lower classes..

  7. These people are right-wing morons, who think they have the right to fuck up kids lungs. The EU begged Johnson to do something when he was mayor years ago, the pollution levels were so high, ended up paying fines instead of implimenting at least some mitigation measures. Tory dumbfucks.

  8. “i don’t want to pay a tax/fee so i will continuously destroy public property, causing damage we all have to pay for with more tax/fees”

  9. These geniuses were tracked down by a fourth rate mail journalist in a matter of days. They’ve taken pictures of themselves committing criminal damage. I dont think they’ll be doing it for long.

  10. If the ULEZ was about pollution, they would’ve banned non compliant cars. They would also ban planes flying over London, would make rail companies change all their Diesel engines. But they won’t.

  11. The big mistake they’ve made is starting off at a high cost. Make it 50p a day, no one would give a fuck. Increase it after a year to 80p, then £1, then £1.50. Do it over four or five years, as long as the increases are relatively small they can jump higher than inflation, it’ll start to edge people towards cleaner cars, bikes or public transport.

  12. On another thread I was asking why people aren’t standing up and taking action against oil companies making huge profits while people can’t afford to heat their homes.

    And here we are; people destroying anything that makes it harder for them to drive through the city and spend more money on those very same oil companies.

    We’re going to hell in a handbasket aren’t we.

  13. ULEZ is a scam. Bus coverage is a joke with prices being literally the highest in the world. No improvements being made at all on that front. Trains in London expensive and always on strike. Im not a tory but Khan is a joke

  14. > The Mayor’s office said it has recored 43 cases of vandalism or theft of Ulez cameras to March 21, but added that TfL would not reveal how much the cameras cost because of “commercial and confidentiality” issues.

    There must be what, thousands of these things? Big woo.

  15. What I don’t get is that if expanding ULEZ is affected the poorest most then why would he implement it Cus surely he’s gonna lose voters? Lose enough voters to lose power.

Leave a Reply